J. Keijer, “The Initial Steps of the Infection Process In Rhizoctonia solani,” In: B. Sneh, S. Jabaji-Hare, S. Neate, and G. Dijst, Eds., Rhizoctonia Species: Taxonomy, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 149-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2901-7_13

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Susceptibility of Wheat Varieties to Soil-Borne Rhizoctonia Infection

  AUTHORS: Gyula Oros, Zoltán Naár, Donát Magyar

  KEYWORDS: Wheat; Rhizoctonia; Tolerance; Brown Patch; Soil-Borne; Virulence

  JOURNAL NAME: American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol.4 No.11, November 18, 2013

  ABSTRACT: Response of 19 wheat varieties cultivated in Hungary varied within large limits to soil borne Rhizoctonia infection. The most frequent symptom, usually leading to damping off was the root neck necrosis. Four significant factors influencing the susceptibility of wheat comprised 71% of total variation but none of them was dominant. The inhibition of development of survivors in Rhizoctonia infested soil correlated with overall susceptibility of variety concerned. The varieties Emese, Kikelet and Palotás are proved to be less susceptible, but none of the varieties could be certified as tolerant. No relationships were revealed between pathogenicity of 26 Rhizoctonia strains studied and their taxonomic position or origin. The anamorph strains of Athelia, Ceratobasidium, Ceratorhiza and Waitea similar to Thanatephorus anamorphs selectively infected the wheat varieties, but the syndromatic pictures were undistinguishable with unarmed eye. R. solani was proved to be more aggressive against germinating wheat than R. cerealis. Nine significant factors influencing the virulence of Rhizoctonia strains comprised 82% of total variation, and six of them influenced exclusively Thanatephorus anamorphs.