Howard, D. (1994) What Makes a Classical Concept Classical? In: Faye, J. and Folse, H.., Eds., Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, 201-229.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8106-6_9

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Einstein Dilemma and Two-State Vector Formalism

  AUTHORS: Kunihisa Morita

  KEYWORDS: Two-State Vector Formalism, Einstein Dilemma, Completeness, Locality

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Quantum Information Science, Vol.5 No.2, May 28, 2015

  ABSTRACT: In the famous EPR paper published in 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen suggested a thought experiment, which later became known as the “EPR experiment”. Using the EPR experiment, they posited that quantum mechanics was incomplete. Einstein, however, was dissatisfied with the EPR paper and published a second work on the EPR experiment, in which he discussed the dilemma of choosing whether quantum mechanics was incomplete or nonlocal. Currently, most physicists choose the nonlocality of quantum mechanics over Einstein’s choice of the incompleteness of quantum mechanics. However, with an appropriate alternate hypothesis, both of these choices can be rejected. Herein, I demonstrate an approach to overcome the Einstein Dilemma by proposing a new interpretation invoked by a new formalism of quantum mechanics known as two-state vector formalism.