Holliman, D. and Bernstein, M. (2012) Patients’ Perception of Error during Craniotomy for Brain Tumor and Their Attitudes towards Pre-Operative Discussion of Error: A Qualitative Study. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 26, 236-330.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2011.633642

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Prospectively Recording Errors Is Valuable in Reducing Complications

  AUTHORS: Caroline Gunaratnam, Adetunji Adeniyi Oremakinde, Mark Bernstein

  KEYWORDS: Prospective Study, Error Recording, Prevention, Neurosurgery, Prospective Value

  JOURNAL NAME: Health, Vol.6 No.18, October 16, 2014

  ABSTRACT: Errors have traditionally been a less commonly discussed topic but are becoming increasingly examined due to a trend towards expanded awareness about the high human and financial cost of errors in medicine. Recording and reporting of errors has been a difficult issue in the health sector due to fear of litigation from patients, complaint to governing bodies, and embarrassment from colleagues. In this article we examine the advantages of prospective error recording. The studies on this subject report that the culture of prospective error recording is of high value in improving most parameters of errors and may indeed reduce complications.