Yokota, K., Satou, K. and Ohki, S. (2006) Comparative Analysis of Protein Thermo-stability: Differences in Amino Acid Content and Substitution at the Surfaces and in the Core Regions of Thermophilic and Mesophilic Proteins. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 7, 255-262.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Differences in Amino Acid Composition between α and β Structural Classes of Proteins

  AUTHORS: Hiroshi Nakashima, Yuka Saitou, Nachi Usuki

  KEYWORDS: Amino Acid Composition, α and β Proteins, Interior/Surface Residue, Protein Domains, Species-Specific Amino Acid Composition

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Vol.7 No.11, September 18, 2014

  ABSTRACT: The amino acid composition of α and β structural class of proteins from five species, Escherichia coli, Thermotoga maritima, Thermus thermophilus, yeast, and humans were investigated. Amino acid residues of proteins were classified into interior or surface residues based on the relative accessible surface area. The hydrophobic Leu, Ala, Val, and Ile residues were rich in interior residues, and hydrophilic Glu, Lys, Asp, and Arg were rich in surface residues both in α and β proteins. The amino acid composition of α proteins was different from that of β proteins in five species, and the difference was derived from the different contents of their interior residues between α and β proteins. α-helix content of α proteins was rich in interior residues than surface ones. Similarly, β-sheet content of β proteins was rich in interior residues than surface ones. The content of Leu residues was very high, approximately 20%, in interior residues of α proteins. This result suggested that the Leu residue plays an important role in the folding of α proteins.