Radioactivity of nuclei in a centrifugal force field

O. B Khavroshkin, V. V Tsyplakov

.
Schmidt Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS Moscow, Russia.

DOI: 10.4236/ns.2011.38097                

Abstract

Radioactivity of nuclei in a centrifugal force field of an ultracentrifuge is considered for heavy radioactive nuclei, i.e., for the same nuclei, but with a significant virtual mass thousands of times larger than the actual mass and is characterized by an angular momentum. As the nucleus leaves the centrifugal force field, the virtual mass disappears, but the spin number appears and/or changes. The role of centrifugal and gravitational forces in radioactive decay of nuclei is studied. According to the terminology of western researchers, such a virtual mass state is called the dynamic gravitation which is more adequate. The oscillator and possible changes in the nucleus state are considered under conditions of dynamic gravitation and taking into account features of atomic nucleus physics. To a first approximation, the drop model of the nucleus was used, in which shape fluctuations have much in common with geophysical and astrophysical analogues. Shape fluctuations of analogues strongly depend on the gravitational force g defined by their mass (or nucleus mass). Experiments were performed by radiometric measurements of transbaikalian uranium ore (1.5 g) with known composition in a centrifuge at various rotation rates or gravitational forces g. The existence of characteristic times or the effect of rotation frequencies (i.e., g) on atomic nuclei, which, along with the nucleus type itself, controls the nucleus response to perturbation (stability increase or decay), is found statistically significant.

Keywords

Radioactivity; Nuclei; Ultracentrifuge; Increase of Virtual Mass; Stability Increase of Nucleis

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Moon, P.B. and Storruste, A. (1953) Resonant nuclear scattering of 198Hg gamma-rays, Proceedings of the Physical Society Section A, 66, 585. doi.org/10.1088/0370-1298/66/7/301
[2]	Knapp, V. (1957) Nuclear gamma ray resonance in 48Ti, Proceedings of the Physical Society Section A, 70, 142. doi.org/10.1088/0370-1298/70/2/306
[3]	Hay, H.J., Schiffer, J.P. and Cranslow, T.E. (1960) Egeistaff P.A., Physical Review Letters, 4, 165. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.165
[4]	Shervin, C.W. (1960) Some recent experimental tests of the “clock paradox”, Physical Review Online Archive, 120, 17. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.120.17
[5]	Champeney, D.C. and Moon, P.B. (1960) Ives-stilwell experiment, Physical Review Letters, 4, 274.
[6]	Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M (1976) Mechanics, Pergamon, Oxford.
[7]	Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1977) Quantum mechanics, Pergamon, New York.
[8]	Mikhailov, L.D. and Kraft, O.E. (1988) Nuclear physics LGU, Leningrad, Russian.
[9]	Bor, O. (1976) Rotational motion in nuclei, Uspekhi Fizz Nauk, 120, 529.
[10]	Mottelson, B. (1976) Elementary excitation types, Uspekhi Fizz Nauk, 120, 563-580.
[11]	Bor, O. and Mattelson, B. (1977) Island of high-spin isomers near n = 82, atomic nucleus structure, 2nd Edition, Moscow.
[12]	Zelevinskii, V.G. (1990) Vibrational excitations of nuclei physical encyclopedia, 2nd Edition, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, Moscow.
[13]	Sokolov, V.V., Zhirov, O.V. and Kharkov, Y.A. (2010) Classical versus quantum dynamical chaos: Sensitivity to external perturbations, stability and reversibility//Chaos 2010, Book of abstracts 3rd Chaotic modeling and simulation/ International Conference June 1-4, 82-83.