Internet Districts in Italy: Is Proximity an Antidote against Weak Broadband Competition?
Alessio D’Ignazio, Emanuele Giovannetti
.
DOI: 10.4236/me.2011.23044   PDF    HTML     4,737 Downloads   8,113 Views  

Abstract

We study the effects of proximity in the interconnections between Internet providers participating at the three main Italian Internet Exchange Points. We find that geographical proximity plays a role in driving Internet Providers’ interconnection, positively affecting the likelihood of an agreement. This suggests the existence of localized positive externalities in the form of mutual knowledge and reputation, one of the cited drivers underlying the formation of districts in non high-tech industries. We interpret these results as resulting from the necessity for cooperation in interconnection between smaller providers facing the weak competitiveness of the highly concentrated Italian broadband access market.

Share and Cite:

A. D’Ignazio and E. Giovannetti, "Internet Districts in Italy: Is Proximity an Antidote against Weak Broadband Competition?," Modern Economy, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2011, pp. 403-411. doi: 10.4236/me.2011.23044.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] European Commission “Commission Staff Working Do- cument, Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Progress Report on the Single European Electronic Communications Market,” Council of the European Union, Brussels, 22 May 2009.
[2] J. G. Sidak, “A Consumer-Welfare Approach to Network Neutrality Regulation of the Internet,” Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2006, pp. 349-474. doi:10.1093/joclec/nhl016
[3] S. Laitner, “Telecoms Groups Attack Shake-up Plan,” Financial Times, Brussels, 14 November 2007.
[4] European Commission “Commission Staff Working Document Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets” Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 29 March 2007.
[5] BT Group plc Annual Report & Form 20-F, 2008. http://www.btplc.com/Report/Report08/pdf/AnnualReport2008.pdf
[6] M. Merola and S. Lembo, “Antitrust Encyclopedia: Italy,” February 2009. www.concurrences.com/nr_pays.php3?liste_pays=15
[7] The Milan Internet Exchange website, 2007. www.mix-it.net
[8] The Nautilus Mediterranean Exchange Point Website, 2007. www.namex.it/
[9] The Torino Piemonte Internet Exchange Point Website, 2007. http://www.top-ix.org/.
[10] A. D’Ignazio and E. Giovannetti, “From Exogenous to Endogenous Networks: Internet Applications,” Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2006, pp. 757-796. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00267.x
[11] A. Marshall, “Principles of Economics,” Macmillan, London, 1890.
[12] E. Glaeser, H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman, and A. Schleifer, “Growth of Cities,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 6, 1992, pp. 1126-1152. doi:10.1086/261856
[13] M. Fujita and J. F. Thisse, “Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
[14] G. Spagnolo, “Social Relations and Cooperation in Organizations,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1999, pp. 1-26. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00119-X
[15] E. Learner and M. Storper, “The Economic Geography of the Internet Age,” The National Geography of the Economic Research, NBER Working Paper, No. 8450, Cambridge, 2001.
[16] A. D’Ignazio and E. Giovannetti, “Asymmetry and Discrimination in Internet Peering, Evidence from the LINX,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 27, 2009, pp. 441-448. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.11.004
[17] E. Santarelli, “Patents and the Technological Performance of District Firms Evidence for the Emilia-Romagna Region of Italy,” Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, No. 29, 2004.
[18] P. Moran, “The Interpretation of Statistical Maps,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 10, 1948, pp. 243-251.
[19] G. J. G. Upton and B. Fingleton, “Spatial Data Analysis by Example. Volume 1: Point Pattern and Quantitative Data,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 1985.
[20] The European Internet Exchange Association website. http://www.euro-ix.net/, 2007.
[21] N. Titley “An Analytical Model of Peering between Internet Service Providers,” Release 1, unpublished, 1997.
[22] A. Shimbel, “Structural Parameters of Communication Networks,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Vol. 15, 1953, pp. 501-507. doi:10.1007/BF02476438

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.