Share This Article:

A Gendered Study of Student Ratings of Instruction

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:679KB) PP. 552-567
DOI: 10.4236/ojs.2015.56058    2,549 Downloads   3,076 Views  

ABSTRACT

This research tests for differences in mean class averages between male and female faculty for questions on a student rating of instruction form at one university in the Midwest are considered to be in the category of “very high research activity” by the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. Differences in variances of class averages are also examined for male and female faculty. Tests are conducted by first considering all classes across the entire university and then classes just within the College of Science and Mathematics. The proportion of classes taught by female instructors in which the average male student rating was higher than the average female student rating was compared to the proportion of classes taught by male instructors in which the average male student rating was higher than the average female student rating. Results are discussed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Huebner, L. and Magel, R. (2015) A Gendered Study of Student Ratings of Instruction. Open Journal of Statistics, 5, 552-567. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2015.56058.

References

[1] Read, W., Rama, D.V., & Raghunandan K. (2001). “The Relationship Between Student Evaluations of Teaching and Faculty Evaluations”, Journal of Education for Business, 76, 189-192.
[2] Arbuckle, J., & Williams, B.D. (2003). “Students’ Perceptions of Expressiveness: Age and Gender Effects on Teacher Evaluations”, Sex Roles, 49, 507-516.
[3] Brady, K.L., & Eisler, R.M. (1999). “Sex and Gender in the College Classroom: A Quantitative Analysis of Faculty-Student Interactions and Perceptions”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 127-145.
[4] Marcotte, Amanda (2014). “Best Way for Professor to Get Good Student Evaluations? Be Male.”, XXfactor, Dec. 9, 2014.
[5] Feldman, Kenneth. 1993. "College Students' Views of Male and Female College Teachers: Part II-Evidence from Students' Evaluations of their Classroom Teachers." Research in Higher Education 34:151-211.
[6] Feldman, Kenneth. 1992. "College Students' Views of Male and Female College Teachers: Part I-Evidence from the Social Laboratory and Experiments." Research in Higher Education 33:317-73.
[7] Lueck, T.L., Endres, K.L, & Caplan, R. E. (1993). “The Interaction Effects of Gender on Teaching Evaluations”, Journalism Education, 48, 46-54.
[8] Worthington, A. (2002). “The Impact of Student Perceptions and Characteristics on Teaching Evaluations: A Case Study in Finance Education”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 49-64.
[9] Basow, Susan A. (1995). “Student Evaluations of College Professors: When Gender Matters”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 656-665.
[10] Centra, J.A. & Gaubatz, N.B. (2000). “Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?”, Journal of Higher Education, 71, 17-33.
[11] Bachen, C.M., McLoughlin, M.M. and Garcia, S.S. (1999) Assessing the Role of Gender in College Students’ Evaluations of Faculty. Communication Education, 48, 193-210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379169
[12] Basow, S.A. and Montgomery, S. (2005) Student Evaluations of Professors and Professor Self-Ratings: Gender and Divisional Patterns. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 91-106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9001-8
[13] Bennett, S.K. (1982) Student Perceptions of and Expectations for Male and Female Instructors: Evidence Relating to the Question of Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 170-179.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.170
[14] Wilson, J.H., Beyer, D. and Monteiro, H. (2014) Professor Age Affects Student Ratings: Halo Effect for Younger Teachers. College Teaching, 62, 20-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2013.825574
[15] Sprague, J. and Massoni, K. (2005) Student Evaluations and Gendered Expectations: What We Can’t Count Can Hurt Us. Sex Roles, 53, 779-793.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8292-4
[16] Laube, H., Massoni, K., Sprague, J. and Ferber, A.L. (2007) The Impact of Gender on the Evaluation of Teaching: What We Know and What We Can Do. NWSA Journal, 19, 87-104.
[17] Sinclair, L. and Kunda, Z. (2000) Motivated Stereotyping of Women: She’s Fine If She Praised Me but Incompetent If She Criticized Me. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1329-1342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263002
[18] Burns-Glover, A. and Veith, D. (1995) Revising Gender and Teaching Evaluations: Sex Still Makes a Difference. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 69-80.
[19] Jaschik, S. (2015) Rate My Word Choice.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/02/09/new-analysis-rate-my-professors-finds-patterns-words-used-describe-men-and-women
[20] Felton, J. (2008) Attractiveness, Easiness and Other Issues: Student Evaluations of Professors on Ratemyprofessors.com. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 151-211.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930601122803
[21] Greenwald, A.G. and Gillmore, G.M. (1997) Grading Leniency Is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209-1217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1209
[22] Millea, M. and Grimes, P.W. (2002) Grade Expectations and Student Evaluation of Teaching. College Student Journal, 36, 582-590.
[23] Culver, S. (2010) Course Grades, Quality of Student Engagement, and Students’ Evaluation of Instructor. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22, 331-336.
[24] Eizler, C.F. (2002) College Students’ Evaluation of Teaching and Grade Inflation. Research in Higher Education, 43, 483-501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015579817194
[25] Basow, S.A. and Martin, J.L. (2012) Bias in Student Evaluations. In: Kite, M.E., Ed., Effective Evaluation of Teaching: A Guide for Faculty and Administrators, Society for the Teaching of Psychology, Washington DC, 40-49.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.