Share This Article:

From Philanthropy to Partnerships
—Testing a Theoretical Framework of Entrepreneurial Philanthropy Alignment

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:552KB) PP. 425-442
DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2015.83044    2,325 Downloads   3,147 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Entrepreneurial philanthropy gives the impression of being a paradox because personal gains and societal benefits are generally seen as opposing forces, which particularly will become clear when philanthropreneurs emerge in the non-profit sector. It is suggested this charitable giving with venture bent might affect an alignment of both worlds. What will happen: a culture clash or a smooth transition? On what issues a partnership is easy to reach, and what are causes for concern? To answer these questions, a literature study has been carried out to construct a preliminary “theoretical framework of entrepreneurial philanthropy alignment”. In this paper a framework has been tested among seven Dutch senior executives of non-profit organisations and five philanthropreneurs. A series of semi-structured interviews were held to explore the variables that could determine the degree of their alignment. These variables were grouped in three domains: 1) Leadership, the linking path; 2) Strategy, the guiding path; and 3) Culture, the driving path. The outcome gave insights to modify and upgrade the theoretical framework, and provided support to study alignment maturity more extensively in a subsequent survey.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Rath, J. and Schuyt, T. (2015) From Philanthropy to Partnerships
—Testing a Theoretical Framework of Entrepreneurial Philanthropy Alignment. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8, 425-442. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2015.83044.

References

[1] Dietlin, L.M. (2009) Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury.
[2] Edwards, M. (2010) Small Change: Why Business Won’t Save the World. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland.
[3] Bronfman, C. and Solomon, J.R. (2010) The Art of Giving: Where the Soul Meets a Business Plan. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[4] Lewis, J. (1999) Reviewing the Relationship between the Voluntary Sector and the State in Britain in the 1990s. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 10, 255-270.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021257001466
[5] Mintzberg, H. and Azevedo, G. (2012) Fostering “Why Not?” Social Initiatives—Beyond Business and Government. Development in Practice, 22, 895-908.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2012.696585
[6] Schuyt, T.N.M. (2012) Filantropie in Europese Verzorgingsstaten. Openbaar Bestuur, 22, 2-10.
[7] Brest, P. and Harvey, H. (2010) Money Well Spent: A Strategic Plan for Smart Philanthropy. Bloomberg Press, New York.
[8] Bishop, M. and Green, M. (2008) Philanthrocapitalism: How the Rich Can Save the World. Bloomberg Press, New York.
[9] Rath, J.H. and Schuyt, T.N.M. (2014) Entrepreneurial Philanthropy: An Exploratory Review. The Journal of Wealth Management, 17, 35-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2014.17.3.035
[10] Connolly, P.M. (2011) The Best of the Humanistic and Technocratic: Why the Most Effective Work in Philanthropy Requires a Balance. The Foundation Review, 3, Article 11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4087/foundationreview-d-10-00039
[11] Young, D.R. (2002) The Influence of Business on Nonprofit Organizations and the Complexity of Nonprofit Accountability Looking inside as Well as outside. The American Review of Public Administration, 32, 3-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074002032001001
[12] Moody, M. (2008) Building a Culture: The Construction and Evolution of Venture Philanthropy as a New Organizational Field. Non Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 324-352.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764007310419
[13] Eikenberry, A.M. (2009) Refusing the Market: A Democratic Discourse for Nonprofit and Voluntary Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 582-596.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333686
[14] Eikenberry, A.M. and Kluver, J.D. (2004) The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk? Public Administration Review, 64, 132-140.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
[15] Baumol, W.J. and Strom, R.J. (2014) Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy: Protecting the Public Interest. In: Taylor, M.L., Strom, R.J. and Renz, D.O., Eds., Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurs’ Engagement in Philanthropy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 11-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781783471010.00009
[16] Dees, J.G. and Anderson, B.B. (2003) Sector-Bending: Blurring Lines between Nonprofit and For-Profit. Society, 40, 16-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-003-1014-z
[17] Brainard, L.A. and Siplon, P.D. (2004) Toward Nonprofit Organization Reform in the Voluntary Spirit: Lessons from the Internet. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 435-457.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764004266021
[18] Sanders, M.L. (2012) Theorizing Nonprofit Organizations as Contradictory Enterprises: Understanding the Inherent Tensions of Nonprofit Marketization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 179-185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318911423761
[19] Buteau, E., Brock, A. and Buchannan, P. (2009) Essentials of Foundation Strategy. Center for Effective Philanthropy, Cambridge.
[20] Clark, C., Emerson, J. and Thornley, B. (2015) The Impact Investor. Lessons in Leadership and Strategy for Collaborative Capitalism. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[21] Shaw, E., Gordon, J., Harvey, C. and MacLean, M. (2013) Exploring Contemporary Entrepreneurial Philanthropy. International Small Business Journal, 31, 580-599.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242611429164
[22] Emerson, J. (2003) Where Money Meets Mission. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1, 38-47.
[23] Crutchfield, L.R. and McLeod Grant, H. (2007) Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
[24] Jabareen, Y. (2009) Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 49-62.
[25] Gray, D.E. (2004) Doing Research in the Real World. Sage Publications, London.
[26] Blumer, H. (1956) Sociological Analysis and the Variable. American Sociological Review, 21, 683-690.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2088418
[27] Faulkner, R.R. (2009) Improvising on Sensitizing Concepts.
http://www.robertfaulkner.org/improvising-on-sensitizing-concepts.html
[28] Parmenter, D. (2010) Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
[29] Van Riel, C.B.M. (2012) The Alignment Factor: Leveraging the Power of Total Stakeholder Support. Routledge, London.
[30] Burkhardt, J.C. and Spears, L.C. (2000) Servant-Leadership and Philanthropic Institutions. Greenleave Center Publications, Atlanta.
[31] Austin, J.E. (2000) Strategic Collaboration between Nonprofits and Business. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 69-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976400773746346
[32] Austin, J.E., Stevenson, H. and Wei-Skillern, J. (2006) Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 1-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
[33] Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2002) The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 57-68.
[34] Chait, R.P., Ryan, W.P. and Taylor, B.E (2011) Governance as leadership: Reframing the Work of Nonprofit Boards. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
[35] Renz, D.O. (2004) Nonprofit Governance and the Work of the Board. In: Burlingame, D., Ed., Philanthropy in America: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopaedia, ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, 466-512.
[36] O’Brien, K., Katz, E., Starkey-Taylor, S., Johnstone, T., Cohen, R., Hansen-Turton, T., Callan, A., Bradberry, N. and Benoit, R. (2014) Reshaping Organisations through Culture and Strategy. In: Mortell, M. and Hansen-Turton, T., Eds., Making Strategy Count in the Health and Human Services Sector, Springer Publishing, New York, 71-115.
[37] Jamali, D. and Keshishian, T. (2009) Uneasy Alliances: Lessons Learned from Partnerships between Businesses and NGOs in the Context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 277-295.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9708-1
[38] Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994) Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 135-152.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150205
[39] Papke, E. (2013) True Alignment: Linking Company Culture with Customer Needs for Extraordinary Results. AMACOM, New York.
[40] Powell, T.C. (1992) Organizational Alignment as Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 119-134.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130204
[41] Schriesheim, C.A., Powers, K.J., Scandura, T.A., Gardiner, C.C. and Lankau, M.L. (1993) Improving Construct Measurement in Management Research: Comments and a Quantitative Approach for Assessing the Theoretical Content Adequacy of Paper-and-Pencil Survey-Type Instruments. Journal of Management, 19, 385-417.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(93)90058-U
[42] Gummesson, E. (2000) Qualitative Methods in Management Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[43] Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (2002) Management Research: An Introduction. Sage Publishing, London.
[44] Bell, J. (2010) Doing Your Research Project. McGraw-Hill Education, Columbus.
[45] Christopoulos, D. and Vogl, S. (2015) The Motivation of Social Entrepreneurs: The Roles, Agendas and Relations of Altruistic Economic Actors. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6, 1-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.954254
[46] Heckathorn, D.D. (2011) Comment: Snowball versus Respondent-Driven Sampling. Sociological Methodology, 41, 355-366.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01244.x
[47] Seidman, I. (2013) Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. Teachers College Press, New York.
[48] Patton, M.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[49] Legard, R., Keegan, J. and Ward, K. (2003) In-depth Interviews. In: Richie, J. and Lewis, J., Eds., Qualitative Research Practice, Sage, London, 139-168.
[50] Tucker, I.B. (1988) Entrepreneurs and Public-Sector Employees: The Role of Achievement Motivation and Risk in Occupational Choice. The Journal of Economic Education, 19, 259-268.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1988.10845270
[51] De Vita, C., Fleming, C. and Twombly, E.C. (2001) Building Nonprofit Capacity, A Framework for Addressing the Problem. In: De Vita, C. and Fleming, C., Eds., Building Capacity in Nonprofit Organisations, The Urban Institute, Washington, 5-32.
[52] Bekkers, R.H.F.P., Janssen, B. and Wiepking, P. (2010) Geefgedrag van vermogende Nederlanders: een verkennendestudie.
http://hdl.handle.net/1871/48189
[53] Leene, G.J.F. and Schuyt, T.N.M. (2008) The Power of the Stranger: Structures and Dynamics in Social Intervention—A Theoretical Framework. Ashgate, Aldershot.
[54] Bryson, J.M. (2011) Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
[55] Chen, S.S. (2003) The Philosophy of Existence and Cognition. Journal of Dahan Institute of Technology, 18, 35-52.
[56] Googins, B.K. and Rochlin, S.A. (2000) Creating the Partnership Society: Understanding the Rhetoric and Reality of Cross-Sectoral Partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105, 127-144.
[57] Anheier, H.K. (2000) Managing Non-Profit Organisations: Towards a New Approach. London, Civil Society Working Paper Series, 1. Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics and Political Science.
[58] van Belle, G. (2008) Statistical Rules of Thumb. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.