Share This Article:

Counselling: The Current Opium of the People?

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:342KB) PP. 105-113
DOI: 10.4236/sm.2015.52011    4,357 Downloads   5,048 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Western religion’s propensity to stultify holiness and the sacred is eclipsed in the profession of counselling. With its fundamentalist enthralment with the individual self, this poster-girl of liberalism, through its central modusoperandi, language has achieved a privileged rhetoric thereby relegating itself to the dustbin of history certainly in Western society. It is less a “sigh of the oppressed soul” (Marx, 1978) as the empowerment of an opportunistic harlotry that energises the profession in a neoliberal marketplace with discourses of social justice routinely cheapened and ideologically hijacked. The author designates a genealogy of this ascendant plummet learnt through retrospective insight. Counsellors have not only unconditionally accepted tablets of stone around truths but also binaries of truths. Interrogating several sacred cows in the profession including the concept of burnout, the should/need dichotomy and the parallel process he apprehends a trajectory chronicling nodal points and concluding that many undertakings within counselling serve increasingly to perpetuate a political-non-political conflation with marketplace morality idealised as liberalism morphs seamlessly into neoliberalism. What descends from a neoliberal paradise are reconfigurations of dichotomies not” of our choosing” (Marx, 1978) but of our own choice. Willingly with the anesthetising of any coherent Judeo-Christian impulses we opt for the sanctity of a vacuous Starbuck spirituality as liberalism or religion in its “degutted” version (Eagleton, 2009: p. 41) enacts the comfort of the afflicted but never the affliction of the comfortable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Carton, T. (2015) Counselling: The Current Opium of the People?. Sociology Mind, 5, 105-113. doi: 10.4236/sm.2015.52011.

References

[1] Anonymous, A. (1976). Alcoholics Anonymous (3rd ed.). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous.
[2] Armstrong, K. (2009). The Case for God.
[3] Armstrong, K. (2014). Fields of Blood. Religion and the History of Violence. London: Bodley Head.
[4] Baker, A., Sellman, D., Robinson, G., Mc Cormick, R., & Dore, G. (1997). The Long and the Short of Treatment for Alcohol and Drug Disorders: Christchurch School of Medicine. Christchurch.
[5] Bible, H. (1987). John 32. Dallas, TX: Thomas Nelson.
[6] Coogan, T. P. (2012). The Famine Plot, England’s Role in Ireland’s Greatest Tragedy. England: Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.
[7] DAPAANZ (2005).
www.dapaanz.org.nz/code-of-ethics/
[8] Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality, Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.
[9] Eagleton, T. (2009). Reason, Faith, and Revolution, Reflections on the God Debate. Yale: Yale University Press.
[10] Enz, S. (1982). Six Months in a Leaky Boat. Melbourne: Mushroom Records.
[11] Fingarette, H. (1990). Alcoholism: Can Honest Mistake about One’s Capacity for Self Control Be an Excuse? [Electronic Version]. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 13, 77-93.
[12] Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
[13] Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
[14] Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Selected Essays and Other Writings. Brighton: Harvester Press.
[15] Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In L. Martin (Ed.), Technologies of the Self. London: Tavistock.
[16] Giddens, A. (2002). Sociology. Oxford: Polity Press.
[17] Gilberd, D., & Gilberd, K. (2001). Basic Personal Counselling. Malaysia: Prentice Hall.
[18] Haralambos, H. M. (1985). Sociology Themes and Perspectives. Bungay: University Tutorial Press.
[19] James, H. (1954). Portrait of a Lady. London: Penguin Classics.
[20] Kearney, A. (2009). Counselling, Class and Politics: Undeclared Influences in Therapy. Manchester: PCCS Books.
[21] Larner, W. (2000). Neo-Liberalism: Policy, Ideology, and Governmentality (Electronic Version). Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5-25.
[22] Marx, K. (1978). A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), Marx-Engels Reader (pp. 53-54). New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
[23] May, C. (1997). Habitual Drunkards and the Invention of Alcoholism: Susceptibility and Culpability in Nineteenth Century England (Electronic Version). Addiction Research & Theory, 5, 169-187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/16066359709005258
[24] May, C. (2001). Pathology, Identity and the Social Construction of Alcohol Dependence (Electronic Version). Sociology, 35, 385-401.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000189
[25] Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.
[26] Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change (3rd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.
[27] Millon, T., Blaney, P., & Davis, R. (1999). Oxford Textbook of Psychopathology (p. 446). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[28] Todd, F. (2001). Co-Existing Substance Use and Mental Health Disorders. Christchurch: National Centre for Treatment Development.
[29] Yeats, W. B. (1976). Selected Poetry. London: Macmillan.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.