A Transient Fear Reduction by Pair-Exposure with a Non-Fearful Partner during Fear Extinction Independent from Corticosterone Level in Mice

Haruna Tomizawa, Daisuke Matsuzawa, Shingo Matsuda, Daisuke Ishii, Chihiro Sutoh, Eiji Shimizu

Department of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.

DOI: 10.4236/jbbs.2013.35043                

Abstract

Social interaction is known to alter behavior and emotional responses to various events. It has been reported that when fear-conditioned animals are put in a fear extinction paradigm with non-fearful conspecifics (pair-exposure), freezing behavior decreases compared to a solitary situation. However, it remains unclear whether pair-exposure during fear extinction is persistently effective in reducing the freezing response. In this study, we examined whether the effect of pair-exposure could be persistently effective on cued and contextual fear extinction. The reduction of the fear compared to the solitary condition was transiently observed only in the cued fear extinction with no difference in the subsequent recall session. We also found that the correlation between corticosterone levels and freezing behavior during extinction was disrupted in the pair-exposure situation. These results suggest that pair-exposure reduces freezing behavior in cued fear extinction, although this fear response reduction is not persistent. The pair-exposure changed an association between corticosterone levels and freezing behavior during extinction.

Keywords

Social Buffering; Pair-Exposure; Fear Extinction; Corticosterone

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	K. M. Myers and M. Davis, “Mechanisms of Fear Extinction,” Molecular Psychiatry, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2007, pp. 120-150. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001939
[2]	R. Bradley, J. Greene, E. Russ, L. Dutra and D. Westen, “A Multidimensional Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapy for PTSD,” American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 162, No. 2, 2005, pp. 214-227. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.214
[3]	M. G. Craske, K. Kircanski, M. Zelikowsky, J. Mystkowski, N. Chowdhury and A. Baker, “Optimizing Inhibitory Learning during Exposure Therapy,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2008, pp. 5-27. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.10.003
[4]	Y. Kiyokawa, T. Kikusui, Y. Takeuchi and Y. Mori, “Partner’s Stress Status Influences Social Buffering Effects in Rats,” Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 118, No. 4, 2004, pp. 798-804. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.798
[5]	Y. Kiyokawa, Y. Takeuchi and Y. Mori, “Two Types of Social Buffering Differentially Mitigate Conditioned Fear Responses,” European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 26, No. 12, 2007, pp. 3606-3613. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05969.x
[6]	Y. Kiyokawa, Y. Takeuchi, M. Nishihara and Y. Mori, “Main Olfactory System Mediates Social Buffering of Conditioned Fear Responses in Male Rats,” European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2009, pp. 777-785.
[7]	S. E. File and L. A. Peet, “The Sensitivity of the Rat Corticosterone Response to Environmental Manipulations and to Chronic Chlordiazepoxide Treatment,” Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1980, pp. 753-758. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(80)90379-0
[8]	J. L. Vogt, C. L. Coe and S. Levine, “Behavioral and Adrenocorticoid Responsiveness of Squirrel Monkeys to a Live Snake: Is Flight Necessarily Stressful?” Behavioral and Neural Biology, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1981, pp. 391-405. doi:10.1016/S0163-1047(81)90826-8
[9]	M. E. Stanton, J. M. Patterson and S. Levine, “Social Influences on Conditioned Cortisol Secretion in the Squirrel Monkey,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1985, pp. 125-134. doi:10.1016/0306-4530(85)90050-2
[10]	M. B. Hennessy, S. Kaiser and N. Sachser, “Social Buffering of the Stress Response: Diversity, Mechanisms, and Functions,” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2009, pp. 470-482. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.06.001
[11]	T. Kikusui, J. T. Winslow and Y. Mori, “Social Buffering: Relief from Stress and Anxiety,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Vol. 361, No. 1476, 2006, pp. 2215-2228. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1941
[12]	S. Duvarci and D. Pare, “Glucocorticoids Enhance the Excitability of Principal Basolateral Amygdala Neurons,” The Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 27, No. 16, 2007, pp. 4482-4491. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0680-07.2007
[13]	M. I. Cordero, J. J. Merino and C. Sandi, “Correlational Relationship between Shock Intensity and Corticosterone Secretion on the Establishment and Subsequent Expression of Contextual Fear Conditioning,” Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 112, No. 4, 1998, pp. 885-891. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.112.4.885
[14]	F. Bermúdez-Rattoni, “Neural Plasticity and Memory: From Genes to Brain Imaging,” CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007. doi:10.1201/9781420008418
[15]	R. Zeitlin, S. Patel, R. Solomon, J. Tran, E. J. Weeber and V. Echeverria, “Cotinine Enhances the Extinction of Contextual Fear Memory and Reduces Anxiety after Fear Conditioning,” Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 228, No. 2, 2012, pp. 284-293. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.023
[16]	Y. L. Yang, P. K. Chao and K. T. Lu, “Systemic and Intra-Amygdala Administration of Glucocorticoid Agonist and Antagonist Modulate Extinction of Conditioned Fear,” Neuropsychopharmacology, Vol. 31, 2006, pp. 912-924. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300899
[17]	Y. F. Guzman, N. C. Tronson, A. Guedea, K. H. Huh, C. Gao and J. Radulovic, “Social Modeling of Conditioned Fear in Mice by Non-Fearful Conspecifics,” Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 201, No. 1, 2009, pp. 173-178. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.02.024
[18]	Y. Kiyokawa, Y. Wakabayashi, Y. Takeuchi and Y. Mori, “The Neural Pathway Underlying Social Buffering of Conditioned Fear Responses in Male Rats,” European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 36, No. 10, 2012, pp. 3429-3437. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08257.x
[19]	R. G. Phillips and J. E. LeDoux, “Differential Contribution of Amygdala and Hippocampus to Cued and Contextual Fear Conditioning,” Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 106, No. 2, 1992, pp. 274-285. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.106.2.274
[20]	P. M. Lledo, G. Gheusi and J. D. Vincent, “Information Processing in the Mammalian Olfactory System,” Physiological Reviews, Vol. 85, No. 1, 2005, pp. 281-317. doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2004
[21]	J. H. Wilson, “Prolactin in Rats Is Attenuated by Conspecific Touch in a Novel Environment,” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2001, pp. 199-205. doi:10.3758/CABN.1.2.199
[22]	T. Nakayasu and K. Kato, “Is Full Physical Contact Necessary for Buffering Effects of Pair Housing on Social Stress in Rats?” Behavioural Processes, Vol. 86, No. 2, 2011, pp. 230-235. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.002
[23]	T. W. Buchanan and W. R. Lovallo, “Enhanced Memory for Emotional Material Following Stress-Level Cortisol Treatment in Humans,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2001, pp. 307-317. doi:10.1016/S0306-4530(00)00058-5
[24]	A. Armario, G. Luna and J. Balasch, “The Effect of Conspecifics on Corticoadrenal Response of Rats to a Novel Environment,” Behavioral and Neural Biology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1983, pp. 332-337. doi:10.1016/S0163-1047(83)91425-5
[25]	C. L. Coe, D. Franklin, E. R. Smith and S. Levine, “Hormonal Responses Accompanying Fear and Agitation in the Squirrel Monkey,” Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1982, pp. 1051-1057. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(82)90297-9