Obstetricians and pregnant women from Formiga’s town, in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Deciding what kind of labor to be held

Abstract

The decision of what kind of labor that should be held is intermittently generating a great debate in Brazil. The growth in the number of cesarean sections has raised worries in some of the involved sectors of the society. It was proposed to investigate the factors which lead the women to take this decision, trying to understand the principle involved. A bibliographic review about the subject was made. The research happened in the town of Formiga, where some data were collected in two hospitalspublic and private about the number of labors during two months. Subsequently, the obstetricians and a group of pregnant women were submitted to a questionnaire, the answers were compiled and transformed into graphs which were analyzed. Finally, the data were compared with the related literature. The number of cesarean sections in the town was above the standard recommended. According to the obstetricians, the main reason would be the preference of the pregnant women, fact which was not confirmed by them, that discrepancy was confirmed by the literature. The level of information about the clinical indications for the type of labor was considered satisfactory by the doctors and the pregnant women, data contestable by the academics. The fear and the pain were identified by obstetricians and pregnant women as a predominant factor for the preference of cesarean sections, provided that, according to the literature, shows the precariousness of information for pregnant women about the normal birth. Another important data is that the doctors can have an important role in the kind of labor to be made. According to the obstetricians, their role would be very limited, but according to some pregnant women, they did trust in the doctors which should be the ideal labor for them. The analysis of most of the data collected shows a discrepancy between the information of pregnant women and obstetricians. Both sides involved in the issue do not admit as responsible for the elevate number of cesarean sections, so, some new approaches are needed for analysis. This analysis and diagnosis indicate the next step of the research: the supervision of the pregnant women, since the beginning of the gestation until the birth, trying to figure out the real factors which lead them to decide what kind of delivery should be taken.

Share and Cite:

Silva, H. , Costa, A. and Herculano, R. (2013) Obstetricians and pregnant women from Formiga’s town, in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Deciding what kind of labor to be held. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 90-96. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2013.31018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Faúndes, A. and Cecatti, J.G. (1991) The cesarean operation in Brazil. Incidence, trends, causes, consequences and proposals of action. Coronary Artery Disease of Public Health, 7, 150-173.
[2] Lane, E. and Gellerte, R. (1984) Cesarean. What is the acceptable incidence? Brazilian Journal of Gynecology, 94, 437-439.
[3] World Health Organization (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet, 2, 436-437.
[4] Latin American Center of Perinatology and Development. (1988) Cesarean birth today. Perinatal Health, 3, 101-108.
[5] Janowitz, B. (1982) Cesarean section in Brazil. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 19. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(82)90419-1
[6] Janowitz, B., Higgins, J.E., Clopton, D.C., Nakamura, M.S. and Brown, M.L. (1982) Access to postpartum sterilization in southeast Brazil. Medical Care, 20, 526-534. doi:10.1097/00005650-198205000-00009
[7] Guise, J.M., Hashima, J. and Osterweil, P. (2005) Evidence-based vaginal birth after cesarean section. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 19, 117-130. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015
[8] Morell, M.G.G. and Mello, A.V. (1995) The statement of live newborn in the State of Sao Paulo: Some results. Demographic Inform SEADE, 29, 201-331.
[9] Civil Society Family Welfare in Brazil (1996) Demographic and health national research. Rio de Janeiro, Bemfam, 1997.
[10] Rattner, D. (1996) About the hypothesis of stabilizing cesarean rates in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Public Health Magazine, 30, 19-33.
[11] Barros, F.C. (1991) Epidemic of cesarean sections in Brazil. Lancet, 338, 167-169. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90149-J
[12] Junior, J.C.S., Kunkel, N., Gomes, M.A. and Freitas, P.F. (2007) Inverse equity and disparities in access to technology in childbirth in Santa Catarina, Brazil, 2000-2004. Bras Health Mater Infant Magazine, 7, 397-403.
[13] Hotimsky, S.N., Rattner, D., Venancio, S.I., Bógus, C.M. and Miranda, M.M. (2002) Childbirth how I see… or as I wish? Expectations of pregnant women from SUS about childbirth and obstetric care. Coronary Artery Disease of Public Health, 18, 1303-1311.
[14] Barbosa, G.P., Giffin, K., Angulo-Tuesta, A., Gama, A.S., Chor, D., D’Orsi, E., et al. (2003) Caesarean section: Who desires it? Under what circumstances? Coronary Artery Disease of Public Health, 19, 1611-1620.
[15] Berquó, E. (1993) Brazil, Brazil, an exemplary case. Contraception and surgical births—Waiting for an exemplary action. Feminist Studies Magazine, 1, 366-381.
[16] (2008) Normal delivery: ANS and Health Ministry launches campaign. http://www.ans.gov.br/portal/upload/noticias/_Hotsite_Parto/clipping.html
[17] Oliveira, I. (2008) The “epidemic” of cesarean section. http://www.ans.gov.br/portal/upload/noticias/_Hotsite_Parto/clipping.html
[18] Dias, M.A.B., Domingues, R.M.S.M., Pereira, A.P.E., Fonseca, S.C., Gama, S.G.N., Filha, M.M.T., et al. (2008) Path of women in the definicion for cesarean labor: Case of study in two unities of the additional health system of Rio de Janeiro State. Science and Public Health, 13, 1521-1534.
[19] Callegari-Jacques, S.M. (2006) Organization of quantitative data. Biostatistics: Principles and Applications, Porto Alegre, Artmed, 19-25.
[20] Dias, M.A.B. and Deslandes, S.F. (2006) Expectations on the assistance to women in labor who are users of a public maternity ward of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: The challenges of a public policy of humanization of assistance. Coronary Artery Disease of Public Health, 22, 2647-2655.
[21] Barros, A.J.D., Santos, I.S., Victora, C.G., Alnenaz, E.P., Domingues, M.R. and Timm, I.K. (2006) Birth cohort of Pelotas, 2004: Methodology and description. Public Health Magazine, 40, 402-413.
[22] Teixeira, N.Z.F. and Pereira, W.R. (2006) Hospital delivery —Experiences of women from the periphery of Cuiaba-aMT. Bras Nursing Magazine, 59, 740-744.
[23] Carniel, E.F., Antonio, M.A.R.G.M., Mota, M.R.M.L., Morcillo, A.M. and Zanolli, M.L. (2003) The “declaration of newborn alive” guiding health actions at the local level. Bras Mater Infant Health Issues Magazine, 3, 165-174.
[24] Faúndes, A., Pádua, K.S., Osis, M.J.D., Cacatti, J.G. and Sousa, M.H. (2004) Opinion of brazilian women and physicians about the preference on the delivery type. Public Health Magazine, 38, 488-494.
[25] Tedesco, R.P., Filho, N.L.M., Mathias, L., Benez, A.L., Castro, V.C.L., Bourroul, G.M., et al. (2004) Determinant factors to the first way pregnant women about the type of delivery. Bras Ginecological and Obstetric Magazine, 26, 791-798.
[26] Potter, J.E., Berquó, E., Perpetuo, I.H.O., Leal, O.F., Hopkins, K., Souza, M.R., et al. (2001) Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study. BMJ, 323, 1155-1158. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1155
[27] Osis, M.J., Pádua, K.S., Duarte, G.A., Souza, T.R. and Faúndes, A. (2001) The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75, S59-S66. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00518-5
[28] Hopkins, K. (2000) Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean? Social Science & Medicine, 51, 725-740. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00480-3
[29] Bezerra, M.G.A. and Cardoso, M.V.L.M. (2006) Cultural factors that interfere in the experiences of women during labor and birth. Latino-am Nursing Magazine, 14, 414-421.
[30] Oliveira, S.M.J.V., Riesco, M.L.G., Miya, C.F.R. and Vidotto, P. (2002) Type of delivery: women’s expectations. Latino-am Nursing Magazine, 10, 667-674.
[31] Mello e Souza, C. (1994) C-sections as ideal births: The cultural constructions of beneficence and patients’ rights in Brazil. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 3, 358-366.
[32] Hopkins, K.L. (1998) Under the Knife: Cesarean section and the female sterilization in Brazil. Ph.D. Thesis, Austin, University of Texas.
[33] Perpétuo, I.H.O., Bessa, G.H. and Fonseca, M.C. (1998) Cesarean section: A perspective analysis of women from Belo Horizonte. XI Annual Meeting of the National Population Studies of the Brazilian Association of Population Studies. http://www.abep.nepo.unicamp.br/docs/anais/PDF/1998/a126.pdf

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.