Improving Laboratory Test-Ordering with Information Technology

Adnan Ali Baddour, Anas Serag Dablool, Saeed Saeed Al-Ghamdi

College of Applied Medical Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.
Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, KSA.
Makkah Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Makkah, KSA.

DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2012.36083                

Abstract

The overuse of clinical laboratory services has been documented for many years. This overuse use does not contribute to the quality of medical care, does not shorten hospital stay, nor reduce mortality. The utilization of diagnostic laboratories has increased over the last decade around the world. This increased laboratory use is appropriate if it allows accurate diagnoses to be made, ideal treatment to be identified and monitored, accurate prognoses to be established, and patients’ hospital stays to be shortened. Thus, improving the appropriateness of testing behavior and reducing the number of laboratory tests have been recognized as essential parts of quality improvement program. In this study, the effectiveness of a computer-based system in improving the laboratory test-ordering in a general hospital was investigated. The study was conducted through four stages, the preparation stage, the pre-intervention stage, the post-intervention 1) stage and post-intervention 2) stage. Guideline and computer system were developed during preparation stage. Medical records were reviewed against guideline recommendations before any intervention during the pre-intervention stage, after guideline dissemination through educational workshops during the post intervention 1) stage, and after implementation of the computer system with the new requesting form during the post intervention 2) stage. The study revealed that the computer-based system achieved a statistically significant increase in the percentage of appropriate use from 44.6% in the post-intervention 1) stage to 55.6%, and a statistically significant increase in the compliance with guideline by prescriber as well as increased in guideline conformity rate from 16.7% in the post-intervention 1) stage to 32.5% in the post-intervention 2) stage, and decreased in the percentage of prescribers whose level was unsatisfactory from 85.4% the post-intervention 1) stage to 66.7% in the post-intervention 2) stage.

Keywords

Computer-Based System; Laboratory Test-Ordering; Guideline; Conformity Rate; Compliance Level

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	S. Lewis and J. Foreman, “Low-Cost Diagnostic Technologies and Clinical Outcomes. The Impact of Inappropriate Utilization,” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1997, pp. 501-511. doi:10.1017/S0266462300009971
[2]	M. Thamer, K. J. Fitzpatrick and S. Perry, “Medical and Surgical Supply Costs. Case Study of a Costly Low-Cost Technology,” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1997, pp. 526-536. doi:10.1017/S026646230001000X
[3]	J. Kwok and B. Jones, “Unnecessary Repeat Requesting of Tests: An Audit in a Government Hospital Immunology Laboratory,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 58, No. 5, 2005, pp. 457-462. doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.021691
[4]	N. Pansini, F. Di Serio and M. Tampoia, “Total Testing Process: Appropriateness in Laboratory Medicine,” Clinica Chimica Acta, Vol. 333, No. 2, 2003, pp. 141-145. doi:10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00178-5
[5]	C. Van Walraven, V. Goel and B. Chan, “Effect of Population-Based Interventions on Laboratory Utilization: A Time-Series Analysis,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 280, No. 23, 1998, pp. 2028-2033. doi:10.1001/jama.280.23.2028
[6]	C. Van Walraven and C. D. Naylor, “Do We Know What Inappropriate Laboratory Utilization Is? A Systematic Review of Laboratory Clinical Audits,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 280, No. 6, 1998, pp. 550-558. doi:10.1001/jama.280.6.550
[7]	D. Solomon, H. Hashimoto and L. Daltroy, “Techniques to Improve Physicians’ Use of Diagnostic Tests: A New Conceptual Framework,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 280, No. 23, 1998, pp. 2020-2027. doi:10.1001/jama.280.23.2020
[8]	R. Conyers, “Modifying Use of Pathology Services; Participatory, Non-Punitive Involvement of Healthcare Practitioners Is Needed,” Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 170, No. 1, 1999, pp. 8-9.
[9]	J. Hindmarsh and A. Lyon, “Strategies to Promote Rational Clinical Chemistry Test Utilization,” Clinical Biochemistry, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1996, pp. 291-299. doi:10.1016/0009-9120(96)00042-2
[10]	P. Shekelle and R. Kravitz, “Are Nonspecific Practice Guidelines Potentially Harmful? A Randomized Comparison of the Effect of Non-specific versus Specific Guidelines on Physician Decision Making,” Health Services Research, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2000, pp. 1429-1448.
[11]	P. Axt-Adam, J. C. van der Wouden and E. van der Does, “Influencing Behavior of Physicians Ordering Laboratory Tests: A Literature Study,” Medical Care, Vol. 31, No. 9, 1993, pp. 784-794. doi:10.1097/00005650-199309000-00003
[12]	E. T. Wong, “Improving Laboratory Testing: Can We Get Physicians to Focus on Outcome?” Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 8, 1995, pp. 1241-1247.
[13]	C. E. Speicher and J. W. Smith, “Inter-pretation of Strategies,” Choosing Effective Laboratory Tests, WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1983, pp. 37-46.
[14]	R. J. Panzer, “Interpretation of Diagnostic Tests and Strategies for Their Use in Quantative Decision Making. In: R. J. Panzer, E. R. Black and P. F. Griner, Diagnostic Strategies for Common Medical Problems, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, 1991, pp. 17-28.
[15]	E. R. Black, “Characteristics of Diagnostic Tests and Principles for Their Use in Quantitative Decision Making,” In: R. J. Panzer, E. R. Black and P. F. Griner, Diagnostic Strategies for Common Medical Problems, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, 1991, pp. 1-21.
[16]	A. Donabedian, “The Quality of Care: How Can It Be Assessed?” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 260, 1988, pp. 1743-1748. doi:10.1001/jama.260.12.1743
[17]	L. Leape, “Practice Guidelines and Standards: An Overview,” Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois.
[18]	W. M. Tierney, C. J. McDonald, D. K. Martin and M. P. Rogers, “Computerized Display of Past Test Results. Effect on Outpatient Testing,” Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 107, No. 4, 1987, pp. 569-574.
[19]	W. Tierney, M. Miller and C. McDonald, “The Effect on Test Ordering of Informing Physicians of the Charges for Outpatient Diagnostic Tests,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 322, 1990, pp. 1499-1504. doi:10.1056/NEJM199005243222105
[20]	G. Wilson and C. McDonald, “The Effect of Immediate Access to a Computerized Medical Record on Physician Test Ordering: A Controlled Clinical Trial in the Emergency Room,” American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 72, No. 7, 1982, pp. 698-702. doi:10.2105/AJPH.72.7.698
[21]	D. Bates, G. Kuperman, E. Rittenberg and J. Teich, “A Randomized Trial of a Computer-Based Intervention to Reduce Utilization of Redundant Laboratory Tests,” American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 106, No. 2, 1999, pp. 144-150. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00410-0
[22]	P. Chen, M. Tanasijevic and R. Schoenenberger, “A Computer-Based Intervention for Improving the Appropriateness of Antiepileptic Drug Level Monitoring,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 119, 2003, pp. 432-438. doi:10.1309/A96XU9YKU298HB2R
[23]	W. Tierney, C. McDonald and S. L. Hui, “Computer Predictions of Abnormal Test Results. Effects on Outpatient Testing,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 259, 1988, pp. 1194-1198. doi:10.1001/jama.259.8.1194
[24]	W. Tierney, M. Miller and J. Overhage, “Physician Inpatient Order Writing on Microcomputer Workstations. Effects on Resource Utilization,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 269, No. 3, 1993, pp. 379-383. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500030077036
[25]	H. L. Chin and P. Wallace, “Embedding Guidelines into Direct Physician Order Entry: Simple Methods, Powerful Results,” Proceedings of American Medical Information Association Symposium, 1999, pp. 221-225.
[26]	T. Garrido, L. Jamieson, Y. Zhou, A. Wiesenthal and L. Liang, “Effect of Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care: Retrospective, Serial, Cross Sectional Study,” British Medical Journal, Vol. 330, 2005, p. 581. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7491.581
[27]	B. Chaudhry and J. Wang, “Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care,” Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 144, 2006, pp. 742-752.
[28]	M. Peters, “Managing Test Demand by Clinicians: Computer Assisted Guidelines,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 48, 1995, pp. 98-100. doi:10.1136/jcp.48.2.98