Possible Impacts of Climate Change on Daily Streamflow and Extremes at Local Scale in Ontario, Canada. Part I: Historical Simulation

Chad Shouquan Cheng, Qian Li, Guilong Li, Heather Auld

Adaptation and Impacts Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, Toronto, Canada.
Science Section, Operations—Ontario, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada, Toronto, Canada.

DOI: 10.4236/acs.2012.24036                

Abstract

The paper forms the first part of an introduction to possible impacts of climate change on daily streamflow and extremes in the Province of Ontario, Canada. In this study, both conceptual and statistical streamflow simulation modeling theories were collectively applied to simulate daily streamflow volumes. Based on conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling principle, the predictors were selected to take into account several physical factors that affect streamflow, such as (1) current and previous quantities of rainfall over the watershed, (2) an index of pre-storm moisture conditions, (3) an index of pre-storm evapotranspiration capacities, and (4) a seasonal factor representing seasonal variation of streamflow volume. These rainfall-runoff conceptual factors were applied to an autocorrelation correction regression procedure to develop a daily streamflow simulation model for each of the four selected river basins. The streamflow simulation models were validated using a leave-one-year-out cross-validation scheme. The simulation models identified that the explanatory predictors are consistent with the physical processes typically associated with high-streamflow events. Daily streamflow simulation models show that there are significant correlations between daily streamflow observations and model validations, with model R2s of 0.68-0.71, 0.61-0.62, 0.71-0.74, and 0.95 for Grand, Humber, Upper Thames, and Rideau River Basins, respectively. The major reason for the model performance varying across the basins might be that rainfall-runoff response time and physical characteristics differ significantly among the selected river basins. The results suggest that streamflow simulation models can be used to assess possible impacts of climate change on daily streamflow and extremes at a local scale, which is major objective of a companion paper (Part II).

Keywords

Rainfall-Related Streamflow; Simualtion; Statistic Methods; Ontario; Canada

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	D. Panagoulia and G. Dimou, “Sensitivity of Flood Events to Global Climate Change,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 191, No. 1-4, 1997, pp. 208-222. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03056-9
[2]	R. G. Najjar, “The Water Balance of the Susquehanna River Basin and Its Response to Climate Change,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 219, No. 1-2, 1999, pp. 7-19. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00041-4
[3]	G. Drogue, L. Pfister, T. Leviandier, A. El Idrissi, J-F. Iffly, P. Matgen, J. Humbert and L. Hoffmann, “Simulating the Spatio-Temporal Variability of Streamflow Response to Climate Change Scenarios In a Mesoscale Basin,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 293, No. 1-4, 2004, pp. 255-269.
[4]	D. Nohara, A. Kitoh, M. Hosaka and T. Oki, “Impact of Climate Change on River Discharge Projected by Multimodel Ensemble,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 7, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1076-1089. doi:10.1175/JHM531.1
[5]	A. L. Kay, R. G. Jones and N. S. Reynard, “RCM Rainfall for UK Flood Frequency Estimation. II: Climate Change Results,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 318, No. 1-4, 2006, pp. 163-172. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.013
[6]	W. S. Merritt, Y. Alisa, M. Barton, B. Taylor, S. Cohen and D. Neilsen, “Hydrologic Response to Scenarios of Climate Change in Sub-Watersheds of the Okanagan Basin, British Columbia,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 326, No. 1-4, 2006, pp. 79-108. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.025
[7]	Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, “Canadian Disaster Database Version 4.4,” Canada, 2006.
[8]	C. S. Cheng, Q. Li, G. Li and H. Auld, “Possible Impacts of Climate Change on Future Daily Streamflow and Extremes at Local Scale in Ontario, Canada. Part II: Future projection,” Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2012, pp. 427-440.
[9]	C. S. Cheng, G. Li, Q. Li and H. Auld, “A Synoptic Weather Typing Approach to Simulate Daily Rainfall and Extremes in Ontario, Canada: Potential for Climate Change Projections,” Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2010, pp. 845-866. doi:10.1175/2010JAMC2016.1
[10]	C. S. Cheng, G. Li, Q. Li and H. Auld, “A Synoptic Weather-Typing Approach to Project Future Daily Rainfall and Extremes at Local Scale in Ontario, Canada,” Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, No. 14, 2011, pp. 3667-3685. doi:10.1175/2011JCLI3764.1
[11]	E. F. Wood and P. E. O’Connell, “Real-Time Forecasting,” In: M. G. Anderson and T. B. Burt, Eds., Hydrology Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, 1985, pp. 505-558.
[12]	H. Gupta, “Hydrological Modeling for Runoff Forecasting,” In: T. D. Potter and B. Colman, Eds., Handbook of Weather, Climate, and Water: Atmospheric Chemistry, Hydrology, and Societal Impacts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2003, pp. 571-586.
[13]	K. Solander, L. Saito and F. Biondi, “Streamflow Simulation Using a Water-Balance Model with Annually-Resolved Inputs,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 387, No. 1-2, 2010, pp. 46-53. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.028
[14]	C. Yang, Z. Lin, Z. Yu, Z. Hao and S. Liu, “Analysis and Simulation of Human Activity Impact on Streamflow in the Huaihe River Basin with a Large-Scale Hydrologic Model,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2010, pp. 810-821. doi:10.1175/2009JHM1145.1
[15]	H. Lee, N. McIntyre, H. Wheater and A. Young, “Selection of Conceptual Models for Regionalisation of the Rainfall-Runoff Relationship,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 312, No. 1-4, 2005, pp. 125-147. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.016
[16]	M. A. Kohler and R. K. Linsley, Jr., “Predicting Runoff from Storm Rainfall,” Research Paper 34, US Weather Bureau, Washington DC, 1951.
[17]	M. A. Bruce and R. H. Clark, “Introduction to Hydrometeorology,” Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966.
[18]	W. T. Sittner, C. E. Schauss and J. C. Monro, “Continuous Hydrograph Synthesis with an API-Type Hydrologic Model,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 5, No. 5, 1969, pp. 1007-1022. doi:10.1029/WR005i005p01007
[19]	R. J. Heggen, “Normalized Antecedent Precipitation Index,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 5, 2001, pp. 377-381. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:5(377)
[20]	J. D. Salas and R. A. Pielke, “Stochastic Characteristics and Modeling of Hydroclimatic Processes,” In: T. D. Potter and B. Colman, Eds., Handbook of Weather, Climate, and Water: Atmospheric Chemistry, Hydrology, and Societal Impacts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2003, pp. 587-605.
[21]	R. K. Linsley, “Rainfall-Runoff Models—An Overview,” In: V. P. Singh, Ed., Rainfall-runoff Relationship, Book-Crafters Inc., Kansas City, 1981, pp 3-22.
[22]	K. Hsu, H. V. Gupta and S. Sorooshian, “Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall-Runoff Process,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1995, pp. 2517-2530. doi:10.1029/95WR01955
[23]	J. M. Ehrman, K. Higuchi and T. A. Clair, “Backcasting to Test the Use of Neural Networks for Predicting Runoff in Canadian Rivers,” Canadian Water Resources Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2000, pp. 279-291. doi:10.4296/cwrj2503279
[24]	A. Nazemi, H. N. Poorkhadem, R. Mohammad, T. Akbarzadeh and S. M. Hosseini, “Evolutionary Neural Network Modeling for Describing Rainfall-Runoff Process,” Hydrology Days, 2003, pp. 224-235.
[25]	T. Asefa, “Ensemble Streamflow Forecast: A Glue-Based Neural Network Approach,” Journal of the American Water Resource Association, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2009, pp. 1155-1163. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00351.x
[26]	E. Toth, A. Brath and A. Montanari, “Comparison of Short-Term Rainfall Prediction Models for Real-Time Flood Forecasting,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 239, No. 1-4, 2000, pp. 132-147. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00344-9
[27]	L. Chen, F. J. C. Bouchart and J. W. Davison, “Application of a New Polynomial Regression Method Based on Genetic Programming in Hydrologic Modeling,” The First Biennial Workshop of the Statistical Hydrology, Canadian Geophysical Union, Calgary, 18-21 May 2002, 6 pp.
[28]	Environment Canada, “HYDAT CD-ROM,” 2006. http://www.wsc.ec.gc.ca/products/hydat/main_e.cfm?cname=hydat_e.cfm
[29]	SAS Institute Inc., “The AUTOREG Procedure: Regression with Autocorrelation Errors,” 2006. http://support.sas.com/91doc/docMainpage.jsp
[30]	C. D. Hopkins Jr. and D. O. Hackett, “Average Antecedent Temperatures As a Factor in Predicting Runoff from Storm Rainfall,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 66, No. 10, 1961, 3313-3318. doi:10.1029/JZ066i010p03313
[31]	C. S. Cheng, G. Li, Q. Li and H. Auld, “Statistical Downscaling of Hourly and Daily Climate Scenarios for Various Meteorological Variables in South-Central Canada,” Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Vol. 91, No. 1-4, 2008, pp. 129-147. doi:10.1007/s00704-007-0302-8