Fluid Dynamic Response of the Russia Seismically Differing Regions to the Global Geodynamics Processes

Valera P. Rudakov, Pavel P. Firstov, Vladislav V. Tsyplakov

Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences.
Russian Academy of Sciences.

DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2012.34077                

Abstract

The results of the spectral-correlation analysis of the fluid-dynamic (radon and hydrogen) data monitoring obtained in the seismically active region—on Kamchatka and in conditions of Russian platform where compared to the results of the laser-deformometer measurements obtained on Caucasus. It allowed identify spectral components of the measured parameters, first of all, in the area of the lunar-solar tides. This identification have demonstrated the identical reaction of the mountain and platform regions to the global geodeformation processes of the tidal level and have shown the possibility of the measuring parameters response to the catastrophic events preparation processes. Really the prognostic effects in the investigated fields where indicated in periods of preparation and realization of the catastrophic earthquakes in Indian Ocean on December, 26, 2004 and on March, 28, 2005.

Keywords

Seismically Active Region; Russian Platform; Fluid-Dynamic Monitoring; Global Processes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	V. P. Rudakov, “About a Role of Geomotions of the Undular Frame in the Preparation of Strong Earthquakes (on an Example of Caucasus),” DAS, Vol. 322, No. 5, 1992, pp. 875-878.
[2]	V. P. Rudakov, “About a Role of Geomotions of the Undular Frame in Activation of Geodynamic Processes in Seismically Passive Regions (on an Example of Geodynamic Appearances of the Russian Platform),” DAS, Vol. 332, No. 4, 1993, pp. 509-511.
[3]	V. P. Rudakov, “The Geodynamic Preconditions of the Neftegorsk Earthquake of May 27, 1995,” DAS, Vol. 345, No. 6, 1995, pp. 819-822.
[4]	E. Yu. Zdanova and V. P. Rudakov, “About a Role of Geomotions of the Undular Frame in Preparation of Volcanic Eruptions (on an Example of Northern Group of Volcanoes of Kamchatka),” DAS, Vol. 329, No. 1, 1993, pp. 24-26.
[5]	V. P. Rudakov, “Emanation Monitoring of Geoenvironments and Processes,” Scientific World, Moscow, 2009, 176 p.
[6]	V. K. Miljukov, A. V. Kopaev, A. V. Lagutkina, A. P. Mironov and A. V. Butchers, “Supervision of Tidal Deformations of an Earth’s Crust in Prielbrusie,” Physics of the Earth, Vol. 43, No. 11, 2007, pp. 922-930.
[7]	V. P. Rudakov and V. V. Tsiplakov, “Fluid-Dinamic Effects of the Moscow Sineclise Fault Structures in Connection with Global Geodeformation Processes,” Geochemistry, No. 11, 2008, pp. 1238-1244.
[8]	P. P. Firstov, “Monitoring of Volumetric Activity of the Subsoil Radon (Rn-222) on Paratunka Hydrothermal System in 1997-1998 with the Purpose Of Search of the Precursors of Strong Earthquakes of Kamchatka,” Volcanology and Seismology, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1-11.
[9]	L. A. Latynina, V. K. Miljukov and I. M. Vasiliev, “The Strongest Earthquakes and Global Tectonic Processes,” Science and Technology in Russia, No. 1-2. 2006, pp. 4-6.