Productivity Growth, Technological Progress, and Efficiency Change in Vietnamese Manufacturing Industries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach

Abstract

This study applies a stochastic frontier production approach to decompose the sources of total productivity (TFP) growth into technical progress and changes in technical efficiency of 8057 firms in Vietnamese manufacturing industries during 2003-2007. Using both total manufacturing industry and sub-manufacturing industrial regressions, the analysis focuses on the trend of technological progress (TP) and technical efficiency change (TEC), and the role of productivity change in economic growth. According to the estimated results, the annual technical progress for the manufacturing industry and sub-manufacturing industries are calculated directly from the estimated parameters of the translog stochastic frontier production function by taking a partial derivative of output with respect to time t. The average technical changes in manufacturing industry and sub-manufacturing industries are positive, with an average technical change about 5.2%, 5.8%, 5.4%, 11.8%, 4.6%, 4.1%, 7.3%, 4.8%, 4.8% and 4.8% for total sample, food products & beverages, textile & wearing apparel, footwear, paper & products, industrial chemicals, rubber & plastic products, non- metallic mineral, basic & fabricated metal and other sub-industries, respectively. Total TFP in the manufacturing sector has grown at the annual rate of 0.052, although the rate of growth decreased continuously during the sample period. For the sub-industry estimates during the sample period, TFP grew fastest in the footwear sub-industry, with annual average growth rate of 11.8%, followed by the rubber & plastic products with a rate of 7.3%, and the food products & beverages with a rate of 5.8% per annum.

Share and Cite:

N. Minh, P. Khanh, N. Minh and N. Anh, "Productivity Growth, Technological Progress, and Efficiency Change in Vietnamese Manufacturing Industries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," Open Journal of Statistics, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2012, pp. 224-235. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2012.22028.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] M. Nishimizu and J. M. Page, “Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of productivity Change in Yugoslavia, 1965-1978,” Economic Journal, Vol. 92, No. 368, 1982, pp. 920-936. doi:10.2307/2232675
[2] P. W. Bauer, “Decomposing TFP Growth in the Presence of Cost Inefficiency, Nonconstant Returns to Scale, and Technological Progress,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1990, pp. 287-299. doi:10.1007/BF00160047
[3] S. Kim and G. Han, “A Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth in Korean Manufacturing Industries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2001, pp. 269-281. doi:10.1023/A:1012566812232
[4] H. Liao, M. Holmes, T. W. Jones and D. Llewellyn, “Productivity Growth of East Asia Economies’ Manufacturing: A Decomposition Analysis,” Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2007, pp. 649-674. doi:10.1080/00220380701259723
[5] N. K. Minh and G. T. Long, “Factor Productivity and Efficiency of the Vietnamese Economy in Transition,” Asia-Pacific Development Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2008, pp. 93-117.
[6] N. K. Minh, N. T. Minh and G. T. Long, “A Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth in Vietnamese Manufacturing Industries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach,” Proceedings of the DEA Symposium, Taiwan, 19-21 January 2010, pp. 164-168.
[7] G. E. Battese and T. J. Coelli, “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 1-2, 1992, pp. 153-169. doi:10.1007/BF00158774

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.