Distinguishing the Dark Triad: Evidence from the Five-Factor Model and the Hogan Development Survey

Abstract

The Dark Triad consists of Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. The aim was to add to the evidence for their differential validity. A battery including the Hogan Development Survey, the IPIP Big 5 and measures of Empathy, Aggression and the Dark Triad was administered to 241 undergraduate psychology participants at an Australian university. Multivariate regression indicated that the Dark Triad shared significant predictors and the Five Factor Model facets failed to clearly distinguish between them. The results of a principal components analysis indicated considerable overlap among the constructs. Overall, limited evidence for the differential construct validity of the Dark Triad of personality was found. Implications for the psychometric properties of some dominant paradigms in personality research, and applications in organisational settings, are discussed.

Share and Cite:

Douglas, H. , Bore, M. & Munro, D. (2012). Distinguishing the Dark Triad: Evidence from the Five-Factor Model and the Hogan Development Survey. Psychology, 3, 237-242. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.33033.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
[2] Bishopp, D., & Hare, R. D. (2008). A multidimensional scaling analysis of the Hare PCL-R: Unfolding the structure of psychopathy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 117-132. doi:10.1080/10683160701483484
[3] Blackburn, R., & Coid, J. W. (1998). Psychopathy and the dimensions of personality disorder in violent offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 129-145. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00027-0
[4] Buss, A.H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 452-459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
[5] Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
[6] Cleckley, H. (1955). The mask of sanity: An attempt to clarify some issues about the so-called psychopathic personality (3rd ed.). St Louis: Mosby. doi:10.1037/11395-000
[7] Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2
[8] Douglas, H., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2011). Construct validity of a two-factor model of psychopathy. Psychology, in press.
[9] Friedenfelt, J., & Klinteberg, B. (2007). Exploring adult personality and psychopathy tendencies in former childhood hyperactive delinquent males. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 27-36. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.27
[10] Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloniger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
[11] Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1989). Discriminant validity of the psychopathy checklist in a forensic psychiatric population. Psychological Assessment, 1, 211-218. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.211
[12] Hildebrand, M., & de Ruiter, C. (2004). PCL-R psychopathy and its relation to patients in the Netherlands. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 233-248. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.03.005
[13] Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy), big five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686-690. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005
[14] Hogan, R. (2007). Personality and the fate of organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[15] Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 9, 40. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00162
[16] Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Warrenfeltz, R. (2007). The Hogan guide: Interpretation and use of Hogan inventories. Hogan Assessment Systems, Inc.
[17] Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Kellman, H. D., & Doidge, N. (1992). The validity of the PDQ-R: A replication in an out-patient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33, 73-77. doi:10.1016/0010-440X(92)90001-7
[18] International Personality Item Pool. A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. URL. http://ipip.ori.org/
[19] Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331-339. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006
[20] Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The dark triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111-120.
[21] Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151-158. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.151
[22] McHoskey, J. W. (2001). Machiavellianism and personality dysfunction. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 791-798. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00187-2
[23] McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192-210. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.192
[24] Miller, J. D., Dir, A., Gentile, B., Wilson, L., Pryor, L. R., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). Searching for a vulnerable dark triad: Comparing factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality, 78, 1529-1564. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00660.x
[25] Munro, D., Bore, M., & Powis, D. (2005). Personality factors in professional ethical behaviour: Studies of empathy and narcissism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 49-60. doi:10.1080/00049530412331283453
[26] Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
[27] Ray, J. J. (1982). Machiavellianism, forced-choice formats and the validity of the F scale. A rejoinder to bloom. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 779-782.
[28] Shea, M. T., & Beatty, J. R. (1983). Measuring machiavellianism with MACH V: A psychometric investigation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 509-513. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4705_11
[29] Todman, J. (2007). Experimental design and statistics for psychology. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.