Share This Article:

Risk Management of IT Service Management Project Implementation with Killer Assumptions

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:341KB) PP. 48-55
DOI: 10.4236/ti.2012.31007    5,729 Downloads   10,859 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Large IT service management (ITSM) project has high complexity and low success in implementation. Five common killer assumptions are selected from Warfield’s 17 Killer Assumptions through empirical analysis. Enterprise interview and questionnaire survey are used to establish and verify the relational model between the root risk factors of implementation of the ITSM project and the six complexity propositions based grounded theory. Finally, risk-averse strate-gies are put forward to meet the demand for complexity: 1) Identify the individual and pay attention to complexity; 2) Select process carefully; 3) Develop innovative language; 4) Personalized the workspace according to the demand; 5) Enhance the role of senior executives; 6) Appropriate communication. The research goal is to reduce the complexity of ITSM project’s implementation in order to manage the risks.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

J. Wan and L. Liang, "Risk Management of IT Service Management Project Implementation with Killer Assumptions," Technology and Investment, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2012, pp. 48-55. doi: 10.4236/ti.2012.31007.

References

[1] J. V. Bon, M. Picper and A. D. Veen, “Foundations of IT Service Management Based on ITIL,” Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel, Netherlands, 2005.
[2] J. N. Warfield, “Understanding Complexity: Thought and Behavior,” AJAR Publishing Company, USA Palm Harbor, 2002.
[3] J. N. Warfield, “Twenty Laws of Complexity: Science Applicable in Organizations,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1999, pp. 3-40. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199901/02)16:1<3::AID-SRES241>3.0.CO;2-F
[4] S. M. Staley and J. N. Warfield, “Enterprise Integration of Product Development Data: Systems Science in Action,” Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2007, pp. 269-285. doi:10.1080/17517570701507685
[5] J. P. Wan, “Research on Software Product Support Structure,” Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2009, pp. 174-194.
[6] W. G. Tan, A. C. Stel and M. Toleman, “Implementing IT Service Management: A Case Study Focusing on Critical Success Factors,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2009, pp. 1-12.
[7] J. P. Wan, H. Zhang and D. Wan, “Evaluation on Information Technology Service Management Process with AHP”, Technology and Investment, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2011, pp. 38-46. doi:10.4236/ti.2011.21005
[8] J. P. Wan, S. Q. Zhu and Y. F. Wang, “Empirical Analysis on Risk Factors of IT Service Management Project Implementation”, IEEE International Conference on Wire- less Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Dalian, China, October 14-16, 2008.
[9] J. Corbin and A. Strauss, “A Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory,” Sage, London, 1990.
[10] J. P. Wan and J. Jones, “Managing ITSM Implementation Complexity: A Warfield Version of Systems Science Perspective,” 2011. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17517575.2011.625572

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.