A New Model for Transmission Network Expansion and Reactive Power Planning in a Deregulated Environment

Abstract

Transmission network expansion planning (TNEP) is a challenging issue especially in new restructured electricity mar-kets environment. TNEP can be incorporated with reactive power planning in which the operating conditions will be satisfied. In this paper a combinatorial mathematical model has been presented to solve transmission expansion and reactive power planning problem (TEPRPP) simultaneously. The proposed model is a non-convex problem having a mixed integer nonlinear nature where the number of candidate solutions to be evaluated increases exponentially according to the system size. The objective function of TEPRPP comprises the new circuits’ investment and production costs as well as load curtailment penalty payments. A real genetic algorithm (RGA) aimed to obtaining a significant quality solution to handle such a complicated problem has been employed. An interior point method (IPM) is applied to solve the proposed concurrent optimization problem in the solution steps of TEPRPP model. This paper proposes a new methodology for the best location as well as the capacity of VAr sources; it is tested on two well-known systems; the Garver and IEEE 24-bus systems. The obtained results show the capability and the viability of the proposed TEPRPP model incorporating operating conditions.

Share and Cite:

A. Mahmoudabadi, M. Rashidinejad and M. Zeinaddini-Maymand, "A New Model for Transmission Network Expansion and Reactive Power Planning in a Deregulated Environment," Engineering, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2012, pp. 119-125. doi: 10.4236/eng.2012.42015.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] G. Latorre, R. D. Cruz, J. M. Areiza and A. Villegas, “Classification of Publication and Models on Transmis- sion Expansion Planning,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2003 , pp. 938-946. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2003.811168
[2] L. L. Garver, “Transmission Network Estimation Using Linear Programming,” IEEE Transaction on Power Sys- tems, Vol. 89, No. 8, 1970, pp. 2025-2034 .
[3] R. Romero, A. Monticelli, A. Garcia and S. Haffner, “Test Systems and Mathematical Models for Transmis- sion Network Expansion planning,” IEE Proceedings— Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 149, No. 1, 2002, pp. 27-36. doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:20020026
[4] M. J. Rider, A. V. Garcia and R. Romero, “Power System Transmission Network Expansion Planning Using AC Model,” IEE Proceedings—Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 1, No. 5, 2007, pp. 731-742. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd:20060465
[5] M. Rahmani, M. Rashidinejad and R. Romero, “Efficient Method for AC Transmission Network Expansion Planning,” Electric Power System Research, Vol. 80, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1056-1064. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2010.01.012
[6] A. Mahmoudabadi, M. Rashidinejad, M. Mohammadian, M. Zeinaddini-Maymand, M. Rahmani and H. Khorasani, “An Application of CHA to Concurrent Short-Term Transmission Expansion & Reactive Power Planning,” IEEE Powertech Conference, Trondheim, 19-23 June 2011, pp. 1-6.
[7] S. Binato, M. V. F. Pereira and S. Granville, “A New Benders Decomposition Approach to Solve Power Transmission Network Design Problems,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2001, pp. 373-380.
[8] R. Romero and A. Monticelli, “A Hierarchical Decomposition Approach for Transmission Network Expansion Planning,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1994, pp. 373-380. doi:10.1109/59.317588
[9] R. A. Gallego, A. B. Alves, A. Monticelli and R. Romero, “Parallel Simulated Annealing Applied to Long Term Transmission Network Expansion Planning,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1997, pp. 181- 188.
[10] R. A. Gallego, A. Monteicelli and R. Romero, “Trans- mission Systems Expansion Planning by Extended Genetic Algorithms,” IEE Proceedings—Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 145, No. 3, 1998, pp. 329- 335. doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:19981895
[11] E. L. Da Silva, J. M. A. Orteiz, G. C. De Oliveira and S. Binato, “Transmission Network Expansion Planning under a Tabu Search Approach,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2001, pp. 62-68. doi:10.1109/59.910782
[12] S. Binato, G. C. De Oliveira, et al., “A Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure for Transmission Expansion Planning,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2001, PP. 247-253.
[13] P. Georgilakis, C. Karytsas and P. G. Vernados, “Genetic Algorithm Solution to the Market-based Transmission Expansion Planning Problem,” Optoelectronics and advanced materials, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1120-1125.
[14] M. Xie, J. Zhong and F. F. Wu, “Multiyear Transmission Expansion Planning Using Ordinal Optimization,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2007, pp. 1420-1428. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907160
[15] R. Fourer, D. M. Gay and B. W. Kernighan “AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming,” 2nd Edition, Duxbury Press, Duxbury, 1997.
[16] R. C. Leou, “A Multi-Year Transmission Planning under a Deregulated Market,” Electrical Power and Energy Sys- tems, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2011, pp. 708-714. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.11.020
[17] A. Karami, M. Rashidinejad and A. A. Gharaveisi, “Volt- age Security Enhancement and Congestion Management via STATCOM & IPFC Using Artificial Intelligence,” Iranian Journal of science & Technology, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 289-301.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.