Modern Economy

Volume 10, Issue 12 (December 2019)

ISSN Print: 2152-7245   ISSN Online: 2152-7261

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.74  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

A Comparative Review of the Status of Domestic and Foreign Management Accounting Research in 2015-2017

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 288KB)  PP. 2355-2372  
DOI: 10.4236/me.2019.1012148    566 Downloads   1,655 Views  
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

This paper summarizes and comments 68 papers published in five academic journals in management accounting from 2015 to 2017 and finds that the research topics and research methods are both diversified. Among them, there are more literatures on budget, salary and performance evaluation than other topics. Domestic research methods are mainly based on empirical research which are based on databases, and are relatively simple compared with the methods used by foreign research institutes, lacking a combination of multiple methods. Although domestic and foreign research basically has a relatively clear theoretical source, domestic research mostly cites existing foreign theories, lacks deep exploration of theory and forms Chinas own management accounting theory system. There are few sociological and psychological theories.

Share and Cite:

Zhang, J. (2019) A Comparative Review of the Status of Domestic and Foreign Management Accounting Research in 2015-2017. Modern Economy, 10, 2355-2372. doi: 10.4236/me.2019.1012148.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.