Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications

Volume 8, Issue 3 (September 2018)

ISSN Print: 2161-4105   ISSN Online: 2161-4512

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.33  Citations  

Consumer Panel Size in Sensory Cosmetic Product Evaluation: A Pilot Study from a Statistical Point of View

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 607KB)  PP. 97-109  
DOI: 10.4236/jcdsa.2018.83012    1,851 Downloads   6,052 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Subjective evaluations are nowadays applied more commonly in cosmetic product assessment. They are used in quality control, product development steps and efficacy studies for claim support. Several studies have been published to determine the adequate number of panelists, but recommendations and guidelines dealing with this topic are rare in the cosmetic sector. The aim of the present pilot study was to recommend a suitable study plan and define the adequate consumer panel size for cosmetic consumer assessment. A questionnaire-based product evaluation study, with three different cosmetic products, was organized as a consumer test using a seven-point scale. As a last step, a specific statistical calculation was performed to define the minimum sample size. It showed that the minimum sample size, besides the obvious statistical parameters of standard deviation and confidence interval, also depends on age and gender of the panelists and product assessment item. Utilizing a CI of 95% a minimum of 60 panelists seems to be sufficient for home-use-test (HUT) with a given seven-point scale. A minimum of 101 panelists are shown to be sufficient utilizing a CI of 99%.

Share and Cite:

Blaak, J. , Keller, D. , Simon, I. , Schleißinger, M. , Schürer, N. and Staib, P. (2018) Consumer Panel Size in Sensory Cosmetic Product Evaluation: A Pilot Study from a Statistical Point of View. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, 8, 97-109. doi: 10.4236/jcdsa.2018.83012.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.