Author(s)

José Germán Flores Garnica^*

Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Guadalajara, México.

Fuel model mapping has followed in general two trends: 1) indirect inferences, where some factors, presumably associated with fuel production, are related to a given fuel model; and 2) experts consulting, which has been used to classify and to validate other people classifications. However, reliance on expert judgment implies a subjective approach. Thus, I propone the integration of geostatistic techniques and the Conditional-Fuels-Loading concept (CFL) to define a more objective perspective in the fuel-model mapping. The information used in this study was collected in a forest of Chihuahua, Mexico, where fuels were inventoried in 554 (1000 m²) sample plots. These sample plots were classified using the CFL; and ordinary kriging (Gaussian, spherical and exponential) was used to interpolate the fuel-model values. Using the Akaike’s Information Criterion the spherical model performed best. The methodology allowed a finer definition of spatial distribution of fuel models. Some advantages of the CFL are: 1) it is based on actual fuel loads, and not only on vegetation structure and composition; 2) it is objective and avoids the bias of different classifiers (experts); and 3) it avoids the need of the advice of experts.

Validation, Fuel Mapping, Geostatistics, Ordinary Kriging

Garnica, J. (2018) Spatial Distribution of Fuel Models Based on the Conditional-Fuel-Loading Concept. Journal of Environmental Protection, 9, 111-121. doi: 10.4236/jep.2018.92009.