Author(s)

Abdel-Monem El-Batahgy, Abdel-Fattah Khourshid, Thoria Sharef

.

The present study is concerned with laser beam welding and its effect on size and microstructure of fusion zone then, on mechanical and corrosion properties of duplex stainless steel welded joints. In this regard, influence of different laser welding parameters was clarified. Both bead-on-plate and autogenously butt welded joints were made using carbon dioxide laser with a maximum output of 9 kW in the continuous wave mode. Welded joints were subjected to visual, dye penetrant and radiography tests before sectioning it for different destructive tests. Accelerated corrosion test was carried out based on tafel plot technique. The results achieved in this investigation disclosed that welding parameters play an important role in obtaining satisfactory properties of welded joint. High laser power and/or high welding speed together with adjusting laser focused spot at specimen surface have produced welded joints with a remarkable decrease in fusion zone size and an acceptable weld profile with higher weld depth/width ratio. Besides, acceptable mechanical and corrosion properties were obtained. Using nitrogen as a shielding gas has resulted in improving mechanical and corrosion properties of welded joints in comparison with argon shielding. This is related to maintaining proper ferrite/austenite balance in both weld metal and HAZ in case of nitrogen shielding. As a conclusion, laser power, welding speed, defocusing distance and type of shielding gas combination have to be optimized for obtaining welded joints with acceptable profile as well as mechanical and corrosion properties.

Duplex Stainless Steel, Laser Beam Welding, Laser Power, Welding Speed, Defocusing Distance, Shielding Gas Type, Fusion Zone, Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, Corrosion Resistance

A. El-Batahgy, A. Khourshid and T. Sharef, "Effect of Laser Beam Welding Parameters on Microstructure and Properties of Duplex Stainless Steel," Materials Sciences and Applications, Vol. 2 No. 10, 2011, pp. 1443-1451. doi: 10.4236/msa.2011.210195.