Measurement and Analysis of PDDs Profile and Output Factors for Small Field Sizes by cc13 and Micro-Chamber cc01

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 9885KB)  PP. 36-56  
DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2017.61005    2,552 Downloads   5,190 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Small radiation fields are abundantly used in modern radiotherapy techniques like in IMRT and SRS. In order to commission these techniques, dosimetric data for small fields is required. The purpose of this study is to compare dosimetric measurements with two different ion chambers cc13, and cc01 for smaller fields. Dosimetric measurements are beam profile, output factor, pdds, and collimator factor. Dosimetric data is acquired in water phantom for two different photon beam energies 6 MV and 15 MV with zero gantry angle. In beam profiles cc13 chamber, measure wider penumbra as compare to cc01. And this wider measurement of penumbra occurs for smaller as well as for larger field sizes. Accumulated relative error in the measurement of penumbra for number of field sizes and 6 MV at dmax, and at 10 cm depth are 34.32% and 27.72% respectively. Accumulated relative error in the measurement of penumbra for number of field sizes and 15 MV at dmax, and at 10 cm depth are 28.49% and 23.92%. In case of output factor for smaller fields cc13 underestimates the output factor relative to cc01, with non-linear increase for smaller fields. But for larger fields, this increase in output factor is almost linear difference of two chambers is decreased. For very smaller fields <2 cm × 2 cm, relative error in output factor of cc13 and cc01 is greater than 5% and rapidly increases with decreasing field size. But for lager fields, this relative error is negligible. In measurement of pdds after the buildup region difference occurs in the response of two chambers cc13 and cc01 for smaller fields. For field sizes ≤2 cm × 2 cm average cc13-cc01 at various depths 30 cm, 40 cm, 50 cm, 60 cm, 70 cm, and 80 cm is almost greater than 0.5 cm. And similarly as output factor, this difference (cc13-cc01) increases with field size decreasing.

Share and Cite:

Nasir, M. , Amjad, N. , Razzaq, A. and Siddique, T. (2017) Measurement and Analysis of PDDs Profile and Output Factors for Small Field Sizes by cc13 and Micro-Chamber cc01. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 6, 36-56. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2017.61005.

Cited by

[1] Evaluating the Performance of Various Detectors in the Small Field Size by 6 MV Linac
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2023
[2] Measuring and Determining the Output Factor of 6 and 10 MV WFF Photon Beams in Small Square and Rectangular Fields using Semiflex TM 31010 and Pintpoint TM …
Jurnal Penelitian …, 2022
[3] Empirical Formalism for the Phantom Scatter Factor of Small Fields: Using Different Density Media
International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical …, 2021
[4] Assessment of polarization and ion recombination correction factors and leakage of small megavoltage photon beams
2020
[5] The effect of SSD, Field size, Energy and Detector type for Relative Output Factor measurement in small photon beams as compared with Monte Carlo simulation
2019
[6] ANALISIS PENENTUAN PDD BERKAS FOTON 6 DAN 10 MV FREE FLATTENING FILTER (FFF) PADA LAPANGAN KECIL MENGGUNAKAN TIGA DETEKTOR YANG …
2019
[7] Comparison of Relative Dose Factors of a 6 MV Beam Measured With Diode, Radiochromic Film and Ionization Chambers in Different Orientations
2019
[8] Total scatter factor for small fields in radiotherapy: a dosimetric comparison
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, 2018
[9] Avaliação das perturbações físicas de feixes de raios X em pequenos campos estáticos: Uma
2018
[10] Avaliação das perturbações físicas de feixes de raios X em pequenos campos estáticos: uma abordagem teórica pelo método de Monte Carlo
2018

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.