Journal of Signal and Information Processing

Volume 7, Issue 3 (August 2016)

ISSN Print: 2159-4465   ISSN Online: 2159-4481

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.19  Citations  

Comparison of Three Techniques to Identify and Count Individual Animals in Aerial Imagery

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 1895KB)  PP. 123-135  
DOI: 10.4236/jsip.2016.73013    1,975 Downloads   2,810 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Whether a species is rare and requires protection or is overabundant and needs control, an accurate estimate of population size is essential for the development of conservation plans and management goals. Current wildlife surveys are logistically difficult, frequently biased, and time consuming. Therefore, there is a need to provide additional techniques to improve survey methods for censusing wildlife species. We examined three methods to enumerate animals in remotely sensed aerial imagery: manual photo interpretation, an unsupervised classification, and multi- image, multi-step technique. We compared the performance of the three techniques based on the probability of correctly detecting animals, the probability of under-counting animals (false positives), and the probability of over-counting animals (false negatives). Manual photo-interpretation had a high probability of detecting an animal (81% ± 24%), the lowest probability of over-counting an animal (8% ± 16%), and a relatively low probability of under-counting an animal (19% ± 24%). An unsupervised, ISODATA classification with subtraction of a background image had the highest probability of detecting an animal (82% ± 10%), a high probability of over-counting an animal (69% ± 27%) but a low probability of under-counting an animal (18% ± 18%). The multi-image, multi-step procedure incorporated more information, but had the lowest probability of detecting an animal (50% ± 26%), the highest probability of over-counting an animal (72% ± 26%), and the highest probability of under-counting an animal (50% ± 26%). Manual interpreters better discriminated between animal and non-animal features and had fewer over-counting errors (i.e., false positives) than either the unsupervised classification or the multi-image, multi-step techniques indicating that benefits of automation need to be weighed against potential losses in accuracy. Identification and counting of animals in remotely sensed imagery could provide wildlife managers with a tool to improve population estimates and aid in enumerating animals across large natural systems.

Share and Cite:

Terletzky, P. and Ramsey, R. (2016) Comparison of Three Techniques to Identify and Count Individual Animals in Aerial Imagery. Journal of Signal and Information Processing, 7, 123-135. doi: 10.4236/jsip.2016.73013.

Cited by

[1] Global implications of biodiversity loss on pandemic disease: COVID-19
COVID-19 and the Sustainable Development …, 2022
[2] Methods for Automated Remote Sensing and Counting of Animals
2022 8th International Conference on …, 2022
[3] Analysis of the Key Factors Influencing the Outdoor Animal Recognition and Counting Accuracy
2022 8th International Conference on …, 2022
[4] A photogrammetric method to estimate total length of the largest mammal, the blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus)
Ortiz, RM Mata Cruz, T Gerrodette… - Mammalian …, 2022
[5] Machine learning for the automated detection of deer in drone and camera trap imagery
2021
[6] 21 000 birds in 4.5 h: efficient large‐scale seabird detection with machine learning
2021
[7] Drone‐based thermal remote sensing provides an effective new tool for monitoring the abundance of roosting fruit bats
2021
[8] Estimating animal population size with very high-resolution satellite imagery
2020
[9] Cameras replace human observers in multi‐species aerial counts in Murchison Falls, Uganda
2020
[10] Estimating animal population size with very high resolution satellite imagery
2020
[11] Comparing an automated high-definition oblique camera system to rear-seat-observers in a wildlife survey in Tsavo, Kenya: Taking multi-species aerial counts to the …
2019
[12] Aerial surveys of Bristol Bay beluga whales, Delphinapterus leucas, in 2016
2019
[13] How do you find the green sheep? A critical review of the use of remotely sensed imagery to detect and count animals
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2018
[14] Animal Detection Using Thermal Images and Its Required Observation Conditions
Remote Sensing, 2018
[15] Perspectives on the use of unmanned aerial systems to monitor cattle
Outlook on Agriculture, 2018
[16] Perspectives on the Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) to Monitor Cattle
Outlook on Agriculture, 2018
[17] Accounting for imperfect detection of groups and individuals when estimating abundance
Ecology and evolution, 2017
[18] Computer‐automated bird detection and counts in high‐resolution aerial images: a review
Journal of Field Ornithology, 2016
[19] Étude de faisabilité d'un indice aérien d'abondance cerfs par drone avec capteur thermique.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.