Beijing Law Review

Volume 5, Issue 4 (December 2014)

ISSN Print: 2159-4627   ISSN Online: 2159-4635

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.38  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

To Open or Not to Open: Korean Rice Market

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 2487KB)  PP. 253-259  
DOI: 10.4236/blr.2014.54023    3,816 Downloads   4,567 Views  
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

Although the “tariff only” principle was adopted in the Uruguay Round (UR) negotiations on agricultural products, Korea was able to apply special treatment to its rice and postpone tariffication of rice imports. After two decades of delay, the Korean government officially announced its decision to open its rice market beginning in 2015. This paper examines whether it would be legally possible for the Korean government to postpone the tariffication of rice imports beyond 2014. In order to address the question, this paper outlines the status of Korean rice in the WTO for the last twenty years. Then, it analyzes the arguments of those who are against tarifficating rice and of those who are in support of it. Based on the analysis, it concludes that Korea cannot postpone tariffication under Annex 5 of the Agreement on Agriculture. While it may request for a waiver under Article IX of the WTO Agreement, a careful and thorough examination is required to decide whether to postpone the tariffication beyond 2014.

Share and Cite:

Cho, Y. (2014). To Open or Not to Open: Korean Rice Market. Beijing Law Review, 5, 253-259. doi: 10.4236/blr.2014.54023.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.