International Journal of Geosciences

Volume 2, Issue 2 (May 2011)

ISSN Print: 2156-8359   ISSN Online: 2156-8367

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.56  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Seismic-Geodynamic Monitoring of Main Electric Power-Stations in East Europe and North Asia

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 8437KB)  PP. 75-83  
DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2011.22008    4,898 Downloads   9,348 Views  Citations

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

In east Europe and north Asia the majority of nuclear power-stations (NPS) as well as large hydro-electric (HES) and thermal electric stations (TES) are located within the north Eurasian lithosphere plate, which is characterized by the low seismicity and weak modern tectonic activity besides the different exogenetic processes. Some operating and projected NPS are relatively near to zones of the moderate seismicity in the Kaliningrad Region of northwest Russia and in south Ukraine. HES and TES in Baltic, Byelorussia and Ukraine are in the same position. Zones of more intensive seismicity and existence of active faults include NPS, HEP and TEP in the Urals, the Kola Peninsula, south Siberia, Transbaikal and Far East regions of Russia. Some of these stations are situated within crust blocks in transit zones, which separate main lithosphere plates and are characterized by increased tectonic mobility. The electric power-stations are most danger in the transit zones between north Eurasian, Arabian and Indian lithosphere plates, where collision processes have yet not stopped. This concerns electric stations in central Asia and Caucasus including NPS in Armenia. Seven schemes of the seismic energy distribution are composed for different parts of east Europe and north Asia. The location of nuclear and main other electric power-stations on them makes it possible to form a correct estimate of negative consequences connected with the up-to-date inner-continental tectonic activity.

Share and Cite:

Y. Gatinsky, D. Rundquist, G. Vladova and T. Prokhorova, "Seismic-Geodynamic Monitoring of Main Electric Power-Stations in East Europe and North Asia," International Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2011, pp. 75-83. doi: 10.4236/ijg.2011.22008.

Cited by

[1] Современная геодинамика горнопромышленных регионов востока азиатской части России и ближнего зарубежья
2016
[2] К вопросу о современной геодинамике и сейсмичности Каспийского горнопромышленного региона
2016
[3] On the Matter of Up-to-Date Geodynamics and Seismicity of the Caspian Mining Industrial Region
2016
[4] Seismic active zones in South Siberia, Russian Far East, and adjacent countries
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2015
[5] Геодинамика и сейсмичность горнопромышленных регионов стран СНГ Центральной Азии
2015
[6] Современная геодинамика горнопромышленных регионов запада азиатской части России и ближнего зарубежья
2015
[7] Современная геодинамика горнопромышленных регионов европейской части России и ближнего зарубежья
Электронное научное издание Альманах Пространство и Время, 2014
[8] ЧЕЛОВЕК И СРЕДА ОБИТАНИЯ/MAN AND LIVING ENVIRONMENT/MENSCH UND LEBENSRAUM
2014
[9] Уровень сейсмической опасности в районах стратегических энергетических объектов приграничных территорий России и ближнего зарубежья
ЭЛЕКТРОННОЕ НАУЧНОЕ ИЗДАНИЕ АЛЬМАНАХ ПРОСТРАНСТВО И ВРЕМЯ, 2013
[10] О сейсмической безопасности геостратегически значимых энергетических объектов России и ближнего зарубежья
2012
[11] АНАЛИЗ ГЕОДИНАМИКИ И СЕЙСМИЧНОСТИ В РАЙОНАХ РАСПОЛОЖЕНИЯ ГЛАВНЕЙШИХ ЭЛЕКТРОСТАНЦИЙ ЕВРОПЕЙСКОЙ ЧАСТИ РОССИИ И БЛИЖАЙШЕГО ЗАРУБЕЖЬЯ
Пространство и Время, 2011

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.