Journal of Water Resource and Protection

Volume 6, Issue 13 (September 2014)

ISSN Print: 1945-3094   ISSN Online: 1945-3108

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.01  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Performance of Hydra Probe and MPS-1 Soil Water Sensors in Topsoil Tested in Lab and Field

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 3887KB)  PP. 1207-1219  
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.613110    3,537 Downloads   4,888 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Soil water sensors are commonly used to monitor water content and matric potential in order to study hydrological processes such as evaporation. Finding a proper sensor is sometimes difficult, especially for measurements in topsoil, where changes of temperature and soil water dynamics occur generally with greater intensity compared to deeper soil layers. We assessed the perfor-mance of Hydra Probe water content sensors and MPS-1 matric potential sensors in topsoil in the laboratory and in the field. A common soil-specific calibration function was determined for the Hydra Probes. Measurement accuracy and sensor-to-sensor variation were within the manufacturer specification of ±0.03 m3·m-3. Hydra Probes can operate from dry to saturated conditions. Sensor-specific calibrations from a previous study were used to reduce sensor-to-sensor variation of MPS-1. Measurement accuracy can be expressed by a mean relative error of 10%. According to the manufacturer, the application range of matric potential readings is from -10 kPa to -500 kPa. MPS-1 delivered also values beyond this range, but they were not reliable. Sensor electronics of the MPS-1 were sensitive to ambient temperature changes. Beyond instrument effects, field measurements showed substantial temperature-driven fluctuations of soil water content and matric potential, which complicated data interpretation.

Share and Cite:

Kammerer, G. , Nolz, R. , Rodny, M. and Loiskandl, W. (2014) Performance of Hydra Probe and MPS-1 Soil Water Sensors in Topsoil Tested in Lab and Field. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6, 1207-1219. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.613110.

Cited by

[1] Use of resistivity to measure deterioration of engineered soils
2022
[2] Statistical exploration of Sentinel-1 data, terrain parameters and in-situ data for estimating the near-surface soil moisture in a Mediterranean agroecosystem
2021
[3] Evaluation of Soil Moisture Sensing Technologies in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils: Assessment of Performance, Temperature Sensitivity and Site-and Sensor …
2021
[4] Statistical exploration of Sentinel-1 data, terrain parameters, and in-situ data for estimating the near-surface soil moisture in a mediterranean agroecosystem
Stitt, N Ahmadian… - Frontiers in …, 2021
[5] Evaluation of soil moisture sensing technologies in silt loam and loamy sand soils: Assessment of performance, temperature sensitivity, and site-And sensor-specific …
Transactions of the …, 2021
[6] Factory-calibrated soil water sensor performance using multiple installation orientations and depths
2020
[7] Soil Water Sensor Performance and Corrections with Multiple Installation Orientations and Depths under Three Agricultural Irrigation Treatments
2019
[8] Assessment of Multi-year Hydrologic Performance of Bioretention Facility using Real-Time Sensors
2019
[9] Impact of stone bunds on temporal and spatial variability of soil physical properties: A field study from northern Ethiopia
Land degradation & development, 2018
[10] Uncertainty of weight measuring systems applied to weighing lysimeters
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018
[11] Field performance of three real-time moisture sensors in sandy loam and clay loam soils
Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2018
[12] Relationship between Dielectric Constant of Soils with Clay Content and Dry Unit Weight
2018
[13] An Accuracy Assessment of Long Term Soil Moisture Monitoring in Texas
2018
[14] Evaluating a sensor setup with respect to near-surface soil water monitoring and determination of in-situ water retention functions
Journal of Hydrology, 2017
[15] Scales of water retention dynamics observed in eroded Luvisols from an arable postglacial soil landscape
Vadose Zone Journal?, 2017
[16] Survey of Soil Water Distribution in a Vineyard and Implications for Subsurface Drip Irrigation Control.
2016
[17] Numerical Modeling of Coupled Water Flow and Heat Transport in Soil and Snow
Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2016
[18] Survey of Soil Water Distribution in a Vineyard and Implications for Subsurface Drip Irrigation Control
2016
[19] Modeling soil temperature to predict emergence
2016
[20] A review on the quantification of soil water balance components as a basis for agricultural water management with a focus on weighing lysimeters and soil …
2016
[21] A review on the quantification of soil water balance components as a basis for agricultural water management with a focus on weighing lysimeters and soil water …
Die Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment, 2016

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.