Journal of Water Resource and Protection

Volume 6, Issue 9 (June 2014)

ISSN Print: 1945-3094   ISSN Online: 1945-3108

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.01  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Measuring Autogenic Recharge over a Karst Aquifer Utilizing Eddy Covariance Evapotranspiration

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 795KB)  PP. 869-879  
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.69081    5,325 Downloads   7,671 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Autogenic, or direct aquifer recharge can best be measured as the remainder of a water balance utilizing precise measurement of precipitation, evapotranspiration (ET) and runoff. ET is the largest component of a precipitation water balance and can be measured within 5% using an eddy covariance system with Bowen-ratio energy balance corrections. Water balance components of precipitation, evapotranspiration, internal runoff, soil moisture were measured using a eddy covariance system, tipping bucket and visual rain gauges, flumes, and soil-moisture sensors. The research site was located within a 0.19-km2 (46-acre) internal drainage sinkhole basin where runoff never flows beyond the basin, but potentially reaches a cave serving as a drain to the sinkhole. Other than the cave drain, the basin slopes are indistinguishable from other slopes across the Barton Springs Segment of the Edwards Aquifer. Over a 505-day water balance interval where change in soil moisture was negligible and precipitation was 42% above average, ET was 68% of precipitation, discrete internal runoff was 6%, and remaining component of diffuse autogenic recharge was measured as the residual of total rainfall as 26% of rainfall. Over a longer period of average rainfall, internal runoff diminished to 3%, but was as high as 42% of precipitation during single storms when the soils were near saturation. These results closely match results from a five-year water balance over the Trinity Aquifer of Central Texas where ET was measured to be 65% of precipitation using a Bowen-ratio climate tower, runoff was measured to be 5% of precipitation, and recharge was calculated as the residual at 30% of rainfall. ET flux tower data from other sites across Central Texas indicate that under average precipitation conditions, autogenic recharge is about 28% and intervening recharge area runoff is about 3% of precipitation. During years of higher than average precipitation, authogenic recharge and intervening recharge area runoff combined increase within the range of 30% to 45% of precipitation.

Share and Cite:

Hauwert, N. and Sharp, J. (2014) Measuring Autogenic Recharge over a Karst Aquifer Utilizing Eddy Covariance Evapotranspiration. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6, 869-879. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.69081.

Cited by

[1] Reliable Evapotranspiration Predictions with a Probabilistic Machine Learning Framework
2021
[2] Widespread woody plant use of water stored in bedrock
Nature, 2021
[3] Evidence for widespread woody plant use of water stored in bedrock
2021
[4] Reliable Evapotranspiration Predictions with a Probabilistic Machine Learning Framework. Water 2021, 13, 557
2021
[5] Springshed delineation in a karst aquifer in Hays County, Central Texas
2020
[6] A Hybridized NGBoost-XGBoost Framework for Robust Evaporation and Evapotranspiration Prediction
2020
[7] Native tree and shrub canopy facilitates oak seedling regeneration in semiarid woodland
2020
[8] Evaluation for the Development of a Jacob's Well Groundwater Management Zone in Hays County, Texas
2019
[9] Barton Springs segment of the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) Aquifer, central Texas
The Edwards Aquifer: The Past, Present, and Future of a Vital Water Resource: Geological Society of America Memoir 215, 2019
[10] Storage dynamics of the upper Nueces River alluvial aquifer: Implications for recharge to the Edwards Aquifer, Texas
2019
[11] Dynamics of ephemeral ponds and suitability for irrigation in the Vryburg District, South Africa
2018
[12] Surface-water and Groundwater Interactions in the Blanco Riverand Onion Creek Watersheds: Implications for the Trinity and Edwards Aquifers of Central Texas
Bulletin of the South Texas Geological Society, 2017
[13] Surface-water and groundwater interactions in the Blanco River and Onion Creek watersheds: implications for the trinity and Edwards aquifers of Central Texas
2017
[14] A recharge-discharge water budget and evaluation of water budgets for the Edwards Aquifer associated with Barton Springs
2017
[15] Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of reference evapotranspiration trends in Karst area: a case study in Guizhou Province, China
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2016
[16] Stream Recharge Water Balance for the Barton Springs Segment of the Edwards Aquifer
Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 2016
[17] Brush Management for Improved Water Yield in Karst Landscapes
2016
[18] Recharge processes of Matese karst massif (southern Italy)
Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015
[19] Surface water–groundwater interactions along the Blanco River of central Texas, USA
Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015
[20] Draft habitat conservation plan for managed groundwater withdrawals from the Barton Springs Segment of the Edwards Aquifer
2014

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.