Open Journal of Soil Science

Volume 3, Issue 2 (June 2013)

ISSN Print: 2162-5360   ISSN Online: 2162-5379

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.36  Citations  

Soil Carbon Changes Influenced by Soil Management and Calculation Method

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 320KB)  PP. 123-131  
DOI: 10.4236/ojss.2013.32014    6,094 Downloads   10,879 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Throughout the years, many studies have evaluated changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) mass on a fixed-depth (FD) basis without considering changes in soil mass caused by changing bulk density (ρb). This study evaluates the temporal changes in SOC caused by two factors: 1) changing SOC concentration; and 2) changing equivalent soil mass (ESM) in comparison with FD. In addition, this study evaluates calculating changes in SOC stock over time using a minimum equivalent soil mass (ESMmin) basis from a single sampling event compared with the FD scenario. A tillage [no-tillage (NT) and chisel plow (CP)]-crop rotation (multiple crop and continuous corn), and irrigation (full and delayed)) study was initiated in 2001 on Weld silt loam soil. After seven years, SOC concentration in the 0 - 30 cm depth was 19.7% greater in 2008 compared with 2001. Standardizing the soil mass of 2001 to the ESM of 2008 for each individual treatment showed an average gain in SOC of 5.8 Mg C·ha-1 in 2008 compared with 2001. However, the increase in SOC using ESM was twice the SOC gained with the FD calculation, where some treatments lost SOC after seven years of management. Estimating SOC levels using the ESMmin and, thereby, eliminating the confounding effect of soil ρb indicated that SOC stock was influenced by crop species and their interaction with irrigation, but not by tillage practices. Over all, the ESM calculation appears to be more effective in evaluating SOC stock than the FD calculation.

Share and Cite:

M. Mikha, J. Benjamin, A. Halvorson and D. Nielsen, "Soil Carbon Changes Influenced by Soil Management and Calculation Method," Open Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2013, pp. 123-131. doi: 10.4236/ojss.2013.32014.

Cited by

[1] Equivalent-mass versus fixed-depth as criteria for quantifying soil carbon sequestration: How relevant is the difference?
Yera, J Romanyà - CATENA, 2022
[2] Urban Soil Carbon: Processes and Patterns
Soils in Urban Ecosystem, 2022
[3] Carbon sequestration in Mediterranean soils following afforestation of abandoned crops: Biases due to changes in soil compaction and carbonate stocks
Land Degradation & …, 2021
[4] Decreased land use intensity improves surface soil quality on marginal lands
Agrosystems …, 2021
[5] Impact of agricultural management practices on soil carbon sequestration and its monitoring through simulation models and remote sensing techniques: A review
2020
[6] Soil organic carbon stock as an indicator for monitoring land and soil degradation in relation to United Nations' sustainable development goals
Land degradation & development, 2019
[7] Soil carbon sequestration accelerated by restoration of grassland biodiversity
2019
[8] The Case for Digging Deeper: Soil Organic Carbon Storage, Dynamics, and Controls in Our Changing World
2019
[9] Áhrif nýskógræktar á kolefnisbindingu í jarðvegi á Íslandi
Thesis, 2019
[10] The Influence of the Rotation Length of Eucalypt Plantations on Soil Organic Matter Dynamics in Southern Brazil
2019
[11] Changes in carbon-stock and soil properties following afforestation in SW Iceland
Thesis, 2019
[12] Comment on “Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content” by Poeplau et al …
2018
[13] Thinning Treatments Reduce Deep Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks in a Coastal Pacific Northwest Forest
2018
[14] Comment on" Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content" by Poeplau et al.(2017)
2018
[15] Quantifying and comparing soil carbon stocks: Underestimation with the core sampling method
Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2018
[16] Soil Nutrients Status after Fifty Years of Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilization
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2018
[17] Comment on “Soil organic stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content” by Poeplau et al.(2017)
2018
[18] Conservation agriculture effects on crop and water productivity, profitability and soil organic carbon accumulation under a maize-wheat cropping system in the North …
Field Crops Research, 2018
[19] Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks: Underestimation with Common Sampling Methods, and Effects of Thinning and Fertilization Treatments in a Coastal Pacific …
2017
[20] Organic carbon associated with tillage-induced aggregates of some quartz-dominated loamy soils in a semi-arid region of South Africa
South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 2017
[21] Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen in Long-Term Manure Management System
Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2017
[22] The effect of organic matter application on carbon sequestration and soil fertility in upland fields of different types of Andosols
Contemporary Social Science, 2017
[23] Soil organic matter accumulation in relation to changing soil volume, mass, and structure: Concepts and calculations
Geoderma, 2017
[24] Long and short term changes in crop yield and soil properties induced by the reduction of soil tillage in a long term experiment in Switzerland
Soil and Tillage Research, 2017
[25] Soil organic carbon and nitrogen in long‐term manure management system
2017

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.