Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications

Volume 4, Issue 2 (February 2012)

ISSN Print: 1942-0730   ISSN Online: 1942-0749

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.55  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Risk of Pacemaker Patients by TASER X26 Contact Mode Application

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 286KB)  PP. 96-100  
DOI: 10.4236/jemaa.2012.42012    5,080 Downloads   8,271 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of pacemaker patients among the general population and of conducted energy devices (CED) for law enforcement and self-defence is increasing. Consequently, the question whether cardiac pacemaker (CPM) patients are on particular risk becomes increasingly important. The risk of Taser X26 electric interference with implanted CPM has been investigated by numerical simulation at MRI-based anatomical models of CPM patients with devices implanted at conventional sites (left pectoral, right pectoral and abdominal) and with the monopolar CPM electrode placed at the ventricular apex. In spite of 10fold higher peak voltages the different coupling conditions make Taser-induced CPM interference voltages lower than those caused by external cardiac defibrillators. It is shown that electric interference considerably depends on ECD electrode orientation. The most unfavourable conditions are encountered with ECD electrodes aligned with the line from the CPM electrode tip to CPM can (EPC line). It could be shown that worst case interference voltages of monopolar pacemakers of any kind of implantation remain below the pulse immunity level as defined in safety standards of implantable cardiac pacemakers and of cardioverter defibrillators. However, interference voltages exceed CPM sensing thresholds. Therefore, capturing should be expected at Taser X26 contact mode application at any position at the upper part of the body including the abdomen, both at frontal and dorsal positions.

Share and Cite:

N. Leitgeb, F. Niedermayr, R. Neubauer and G. Loos, "Risk of Pacemaker Patients by TASER X26 Contact Mode Application," Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2012, pp. 96-100. doi: 10.4236/jemaa.2012.42012.

Cited by

[1] Exposures to Conducted Electrical Weapons (Including TASER® Devices): How Many and for How Long are Acceptable?
Journal of forensic sciences, 2015
[2] Cardiac fibrillation risk of taser weapons
Health physics, 2014
[3] Exposures to Conducted Electrical Weapons (Including TASER? Devices): How Many and for How Long are Acceptable?
Journal of forensic sciences, 2014
[4] Impact of EAS Systems on Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers and Defibrillators
Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, 2013
[5] Physiological attributes of arrest-related sudden deaths proximate to the application of TASER electronic control devices: an evidence based study of the theory of …
2013
[6] Physiological Attributes of Arrest-Related Sudden Deaths Proximate to the Application of TASER Electronic Control Devices: An Evidence Based Study of the Theory of High-Risk Groups
2013
[7] Impact of a Radio Frequency Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) System on Active Implants
2012

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.