Open Access Library Journal

Volume 10, Issue 11 (November 2023)

ISSN Print: 2333-9705   ISSN Online: 2333-9721

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.73  Citations  

Lecturer-Facilitated Learning vs. Self-Directed Learning. Which Motivates Students Better? —Structural Equation Modelling Approach

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 1598KB)  PP. 1-17  
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110924    45 Downloads   315 Views  

ABSTRACT

The main aim of this research is to analyze Gen Z-ers’ preferences with regard to lecturer-facilitated learning and self-directed learning. The responses gathered 214 usable responses through an online survey revealed that Gen Z-ers advocate the use of technology in learning; however, their motivation to learn is higher during face-to-face classes. They find that lecturer-facilitated learning is better than self-directed, technology-facilitated learning. Gen Z-ers also place importance on interactive classroom sessions which give them an opportunity to enhance learning through handson activities. The findings of this study can assist lecturers in having a clearer understanding of Gen Z members’ expectations, and in providing a meaningful learning experience to students from this generation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first to integrate Rogers’ Theory and Self-Directed Learning Theory (SDL) as theoretical support in examining the effect of lecturer-facilitated learning and self-directed learning on university students’ motivation. In addition to that, the findings would motivate Gen Z members to reflect on their own learning needs and guide them to be more successful academically.

Share and Cite:

Nair, S.G., Sa’dom, N.Z.M. and Utanes, G.C. (2023) Lecturer-Facilitated Learning vs. Self-Directed Learning. Which Motivates Students Better? —Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Open Access Library Journal, 10, 1-17. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1110924.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.