Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Village Animal Health Workers and Veterinary Drug Retailers in Cambodia ()
Affiliation(s)
1Graduate School, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
2Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
3Faculty of Agro-Industry, Royal University of Agriculture, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
4Department of Veterinary Paraclinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños, Philippines.
ABSTRACT
Misuse, overuse, and missed prescription of
antimicrobials are the driving factors to antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
leading to a globally increasing public health concern. This study was conducted
to assess the current knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of village
animal health workers (VAHWs) and veterinary drug retailers (VDRs) on
antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The sample size was
calculated following [1]. KAP data were scored and categorized following
Bloom’s cut-off score. A total of 108 study populations (66 VAHWs and 42 VDRs) were purposively surveyed
using a validated KAP questionnaire in 5 provinces across Cambodia. This study
found that VAHWs and VDRs have moderate levels of knowledge (61% to 65%) and
good attitudes towards AMU (83% to 84%) but employed moderate practices (59% to
74%) on AMU. VAHWs had moderate (66%); while DVRs had poor knowledge (58%) on
AMR. Thus, regular awareness education specifically on proper use, prudent use,
and stewardships on AMU and AMR in the form of refresher training or awareness
events must be provided to VAHWs and VDRs to avoid inappropriate use of
antimicrobials and spreading the AMR knowledge across Cambodia.
Share and Cite:
Chea, B. , Kong, S. , Thim, S. , Ban, N. , Chrun, R. , Venn, V. , Fernandez-Colorado, C. and Kang, K. (2023) Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance among Village Animal Health Workers and Veterinary Drug Retailers in Cambodia.
Open Journal of Animal Sciences,
13, 98-113. doi:
10.4236/ojas.2023.131007.
Cited by
No relevant information.