Modern Economy

Volume 13, Issue 8 (August 2022)

ISSN Print: 2152-7245   ISSN Online: 2152-7261

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.74  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Research on the Materiality Standard of inside Information

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 284KB)  PP. 1115-1125  
DOI: 10.4236/me.2022.138058    104 Downloads   551 Views  Citations
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

China’s legislation on insider trading started relatively late, but it has used comprehensive legislation based on the experience of other jurisdictions, which has a certain advanced nature. The legal norms of our country are relatively vague in defining the materiality standard of inside information. There are two kinds of standards for the determination of the materiality of inside information: how to choose the standard of rational investors and the standard of price sensitivity. Through the analysis of the four legislative methods including definitional, enumerated, precedent and comprehensive from the perspective of comparative law, combined with Chinese existing legal framework and specific national conditions, for the identification standard of inside information, it is suggested to adopt both the price sensitivity standard and the rational investor standard to improve the list of inside information and the legislation in order to make our country’s standard for defining the significance of inside information more reasonable.

Share and Cite:

Liu, W. (2022) Research on the Materiality Standard of inside Information. Modern Economy, 13, 1115-1125. doi: 10.4236/me.2022.138058.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.