Author(s)

Motoki Takenaka^1*, Tatsuro Furui¹, Noriko Suzuki¹, Tiger Koike¹, Hitomi Aoki², Ken-Ichirou Morishige¹

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
²Department of Tissue and Organ Development, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.

Aim: Glutathione (GSH) is an antioxidant, protecting cell against toxicity of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Data showed that GSH might play roles in malignancy including ovarian cancer (OC), and, thus, we attempted to determine the clinical significance of GSH and effects of erastin (an inhibitor of GSH synthesis) in OC. Methods: OC tissues were taken from 41 OC patients, and cancer-tissue GSH level was measured with GSH Assay Kit. Survival curves were carried out by the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard risk regression model was performed to screen the independent factor affecting the prognosis of OC patients. In vitro effect of erastin was studied using OC cell lines. Cell viability, GSH levels and whole (cytosolic and lipid) ROS production were assessed. Results: Patients with high OC-tissue-GSH levels had an apparently lower progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those with low GSH levels. The GSH levels were independent factors for predicting the PFS and OS. The basal ROS level was inversely proportional to GSH levels in OC cell lines. The basal GSH levels were important for estimating the sensitivity to erastin. Reduction of intracellular GSH levels increased whole ROS, which caused cell deaths. Conclusions: Data suggested that the GSH levels could be a candidate of prognostic biomarkers and that erastin might be worth studying as a new therapeutic drug in OC.

Glutathione, Reactive Oxygen Species, Ovarian Cancer, Erastin

Takenaka, M. , Furui, T. , Suzuki, N. , Koike, T. , Aoki, H. and Morishige, K. (2022) Glutathione as a Prognostic Biomarker and a Potential Therapeutic Target for Ovarian Cancer. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12, 56-66. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2022.121006.