Beijing Law Review

Volume 12, Issue 4 (December 2021)

ISSN Print: 2159-4627   ISSN Online: 2159-4635

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.38  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

The Essence of Remedial Secession: From the Perspectives of Human Right and Preservation of Natural Resources

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 330KB)  PP. 1252-1267  
DOI: 10.4236/blr.2021.124064    426 Downloads   4,514 Views  

ABSTRACT

Despite the growing separatist and autonomy movements throughout the world, the international legal framework appears to support unilateral secession as a response to any coercive conduct of a parent state. Due to historical challenges and wars, new states have recently been formed by secession from their parent nations. From the standpoint of human rights and natural resources, international legal instruments and judicial precedents must be investigated in remedial secession. It is critical to address the question of whether a single ethnic group may claim remedial secession if they suffer all of the (environmental or other) ills caused by the exploitation of natural resources but receive none of the benefits. This article attempts to address these and related topics.

Share and Cite:

Adimassu, Y. (2021) The Essence of Remedial Secession: From the Perspectives of Human Right and Preservation of Natural Resources. Beijing Law Review, 12, 1252-1267. doi: 10.4236/blr.2021.124064.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.