Author(s)

Zhyldyz Aitbaeva¹, Dzhamilia Asanbekova², Kanykei Nurmamat kyzy², Zamirbek Zholdoshbai uulu², Nurzhamal Egemberdieva¹, Kanzada Karabaeva², Aigul Osmonova², Zhypargul Abdullaeva^3*

¹Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan.
²Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan.
³Science and Research Department, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan.

This article is inverstigating certain problems of customary law legal norms in family institutions and marriage relations. Government politics during the establishment of Soviet authority exhibited responsible character associated with massive violations in human rights. All legislative acts in the legal relation were legally insolvent, as they came into conflict with constitutional principles, violating both the rights of the citizens majority individually, and among peoples as a whole. In the period of a social society development, the government policy was inspected, aiming in raising the status of women in society and in the government. Research purpose is to reveal the specific influence of policy pursued by the tsarist government and the Soviet government on the customary law of the Kyrgyzs, in particular in the field of family, marriage relations, legal and social status of women. Research methods are based on the historical, legal and comparative analysis results, on the features of women legal status in family and society during the establishment of the soviet power; identification of the advanced and reasonable trends combination of the tsarist government legislation under traditional view of the Kyrgyzs.

Women Rights, Family Institute, Marriage Relations, Common Rights, The Soviet Government, Soviet Legislation, Soviet Authority

Aitbaeva, Z., Asanbekova, D., kyzy, K. N., uulu, Z. Z., Egemberdieva, N., Karabaeva, K., Osmonova, A., & Abdullaeva, Z. (2021) Certain Problems of Customary Legal Norms in Family Institutions and Marriage Relations in Sovereign Kyrgyzstan. Open Journal of Political Science, 11, 234-241. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2021.112015.