The Perception of Web 2.0 Technologies on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Case Study

Journals Menu

Follow SCIRP

	+1 323-425-8868
	customer@scirp.org
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

Creative Education

ISSN Print: 2151-4755
ISSN Online: 2151-4771
www.scirp.org/journal/ce
E-mail: ce@scirp.org

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.02
Citations h5-index & Ranking

Journals Menu

"The Perception of Web 2.0 Technologies on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Case Study"
written by Stacia Ann Zelick,
published by Creative Education, Vol.4 No.7B, 2013

has been cited by the following article(s):

Google Scholar
CrossRef

[1]	TECHNOLOGY-ENRICHED LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN THE SLOVAK EDUCATION CONTEXT: USING WEB 2.0 TOOLS FOR DEVELOPING STUDENTS’SPEAKING SKILLS _


[2]	Factors Influencing the Financial Situation and Management of Small and Medium Enterprises
	Journal of Risk and …, 2022

[3]	A Retrospective Evaluation of Pre-Pandemic Online Teacher Learning Experiences
	SAGE Open, 2022

[4]	TPACK Factors: A Mixed Method Research Study Comparing Generational Use of Technology in the Classroom
	2021

[5]	KOMUNIKACIJSKI POTENCIJALI DRUŠTVENIH MREŽA U RADU S UČENICIMA OSNOVNIH ŠKOLA
	2021

[6]	The effect of web 2.0 tools on Turkish EFL studentspeer review types, attitude and writing performance
	2020

[7]	Election marketing and communication management in the local public sphere
	Ligieza - Zarządzanie Mediami, 2020

[8]	Teachers' beliefs to integrate Web 2.0 technology in their pedagogy and their influence on attitude, perceived norms, and perceived behavior control
	2020

[9]	Framework for Web 2.0 implementation in higher education: Experts' validation
	2020

[10]	Barriers to the Adoption and Usage of Learning Management Systems by Higher Education Faculty: A Generic Qualitative Inquiry
	2020

[11]	Developing a Scale to Assess Teachers' Perceptions towards Using Web 2.0 Tools in Lectures (TPUWL Scale)
	2020

[12]	Residential Faculty Members' Differential Use of Blackboard Tools: A Case Study
	2020

[13]	Higher Education and Web 2.0: Barriers and Best Practices From the Standpoint of Practitioners
	2019

[14]	A Phenomenological Study Exploring Perceptions of the Net Generation and the Use of Visual Web 2.0 Tools in Online and On-Ground Classrooms
	2019

[15]	Faculty Perceptions and Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Saudi Arabian Higher Education
	2019

[16]	An Investigation of the Adoption of Social Media Applications by Faculty Members at a Prominent University in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
	2019

[17]	A Social Networking Model for Higher Education in Pakistan
	2019

[18]	THE USE OF WIKIS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE TRADITIONAL CLASS WORKS
	INTED2019 …, 2019

[19]	Integrating ICT into the teaching practice of academics at a university
	2018

[20]	A practitioner's enquiry into the benefits of social networking services in the teaching and learning of Business Studies at a particular high school in Eswatini.
	2018

[21]	Model for the effective implementation of Web 2.0 in higher education from the viewpoint of the teachers
	ICERI2017 Proceedings, 2017

[22]	Mathematics Teachers' Perception of Using Social Media in Their Teaching in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
	2017

[23]	Web-Based Technology Integration and Student Engagement in a Fully Online Graduate Program
	ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2017

[24]	Learning Management Systems in Traditional Face-to-Face Courses: A Narrative Inquiry Study
	ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2017

[25]	QUESTIONING WEB 2.0 PRACTICES IN LANGUAGE LEARNING
	ICERI2017 Proceedings, 2017

[26]	Factoren en Overtuigingen die de Intentie Beïnvloeden van Docenten in Hoger Onderwijs om Web 2.0 Technologieën te Integreren in hun Constructivistische …
	2016

[27]	Factors and Beliefs that Influence Higher Education Teachers’ Intention to Integrate Web 2.0 Technologies into Their Constructivist Pedagogy: A Study with the Reasoned Action Approach
	Thesis, 2016

[28]	Foreign Language College Achievement and the Infusion of Three Selected Web 2.0 Technologies: A Mixed Method Case Study
	2016

[29]	Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching
	The Internet and Higher Education, 2016

[30]	Ecologies of practice in tertiary art and design: a review of two cases
	Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 2016

[31]	Factoren en Overtuigingen die de Intentie Beïnvloeden van Docenten in Hoger Onderwijs om Web 2.0 Technologieën te Integreren in hun Constructivistische …
	2016

[32]	Japanese Language Teaching in High School and Use of Multiple Intelligences Theory
	ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2016

[33]	The relationship between institutional culture and faculty perceptions of online learning in chiropractic higher education
	ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2016

[34]	Factoren en Overtuigingen die de Intentie Beïnvloeden van Docenten in Hoger Onderwijs om Web 2.0 Technologieën te Integreren in hun …
	2016

[35]	Expectativas que poseen los docentes universitarios de carreras de Pedagogía en relación al uso de las TIC
	2015

[36]	The Use of Twitter as a Collaborative Environment for K-12 Teachers: Perceptions of 140 Character Professional Learning Communities
	ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2015

[37]	Higher education faculty use of a learning management system in face-to-face classes
	2015

[38]	Evaluating the effects of an ebook to support faculty who teach with VoiceThread: An action research study
	2015

[39]	Exploring the role Social Media plays in the student learning experience of 2014 university life in NZ
	2014

[40]	Evaluation on the use of e-learning tools to support teaching and learning in aquaculture and aquatic sciences education
	Aquaculture International.Springer, 2013

[1]	Exploring the nexus between assessment, quality and social justice: reflections on remote assessment practices Teaching in Higher Education, 2023 DOI:10.1080/13562517.2023.2224247

[2]	Factors Influencing the Financial Situation and Management of Small and Medium Enterprises Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2022 DOI:10.3390/jrfm15120554

[3]	Framework for Web 2.0 implementation in higher education: Experts’ validation Higher Education Quarterly, 2021 DOI:10.1111/hequ.12295

[4]	Developing a Scale to Assess Teachers’ Perceptions towards Using Web 2.0 Tools in Lectures (TPUWL Scale) Participatory Educational Research, 2020 DOI:10.17275/per.20.38.7.3

[5]	Teachers’ beliefs to integrate Web 2.0 technology in their pedagogy and their influence on attitude, perceived norms, and perceived behavior control International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2020 DOI:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100014

[6]	Developing a Scale to Assess Teachers’ Perceptions towards Using Web 2.0 Tools in Lectures (TPUWL Scale) Participatory Educational Research, 2020 DOI:10.17275/per.20.38.7.3

[7]	Advanced Web Applications and Progressing E-Learning 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, 2019 DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-7435-4.ch006

[8]	Mathematics Teachers’ Perception of Using Social Media in Their Teaching in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2017 DOI:10.29333/iejme/604

[9]	Ecologies of practice in tertiary art and design: a review of two cases Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 2016 DOI:10.1108/HESWBL-04-2015-0014

[10]	Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching The Internet and Higher Education, 2016 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001

[11]	Evaluation on the use of e-learning tools to support teaching and learning in aquaculture and aquatic sciences education Aquaculture International, 2015 DOI:10.1007/s10499-014-9828-9

Follow SCIRP

	+1 323-425-8868
	customer@scirp.org
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

Creative Education

Creative Education

Journals Menu

Home

About SCIRP

Service

Policies