The impact of a computerized care records service (CRS) on doctors’ work patterns in urological outpatient clinics

Stefanos Kachrilas, Christian Bach, Pryia Kumar, Faruqz Zaman, Nicola Dickens, Junaid Masood, Noor Buchholz

.

DOI: 10.4236/health.2011.311118                

Abstract

Objective: Government targets to reduce waiting times are putting enormous pressures on outpatient services. The implementation of an electronic care records service (CRS) at our hospital in 2008 has led to widespread press coverage of ensuing chaos in clinical administration. We wanted to know how this new electronic system impacted on our working patterns in outpatient clinics and – more specifically – on the time actually spent with the patients. Material & methods: This study was performed 4 and 12 months after implementation of CRS to assess its impact on the time distribution in clinic. Senior doctors were monitored with a stop clock during consultations. Timings for pre- and post-consultation administration, and the actual consultation with the patient were recorded. A total of 170 consultations were evaluated in this way. Results: The key findings were that the total time needed to spend on a urological outpatient of 16 minutes remains unchanged from the pre-CRS era, but a majority (57%) of this time is spent in administration on the computer without the patient involved. Conclusion: No more than 15 patients should be seen in a 4 hour outpatient clinic per doctor. This recommendation drawn up by BAUS before CRS remains still valid. Patient administration related to the consultation that has previously been done by administrative aides is now to be done by the doctors on the computer in the same consultation session. Intended to streamline patient pathways, this does reduce the quality interaction-time between doctor and patients significantly.

Keywords

Working Pattern; Consultation Time; care records service; Outpatient Clinic; National Health System NHS

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Mundy, A.R. (1998) The future of British Urology. British Journal of Urology, 82, 476-486. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410X.1998.00817.x
[2]	Bromage, S.J., Napier-Hemy, R.D., Payne, S.R. and Pearce, I. (2006) Outpatient follow up appointments; Are we using the resources effectively? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 82, 465-467. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.043547
[3]	Gilmore, P.E., Shackley, D.C., Clarke, N.W., Betts, C.D. and O’Flynn, K.J. (2005) National review of urology outpatient practice in the UK. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 81, 55-57. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2004.020693
[4]	Sinclair, A.M., Derbyshire, L.F., Clarke, N.W., Betts, C.D., Shackley, D.C. and O’Flynn, K.J. (2009) National re-audit of urology outpatient practice in the UK. British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology, 4, 160-165. doi:10.1016/j.bjmsu.2009.03.003
[5]	Irvine, H. and Scott P. (1995) Consultants spend more time with each patient than in the past (letter). British Medical Journal, 311, 59. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.59b
[6]	Patel, H.R.H., Luxman, C.N., Bailey, T.S., Brunning, J.D.M., Zemmel, D., Morrell, L.K., Nathan, M.S. and Miller, R.A. (2002) Outpatient clinic: where is the delay? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 95, 604-605. doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.12.604
[7]	Hoeksma, J. (2008) Barts still struggling with Cerner CRS. Accessed on October 2008. http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/4205/barts_still_struggling_with_cerner_crs
[8]	Collins, T. (2009) Barts responds over patients lost in NPfIT CRS system. Accessed on 29 April 2009. http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/04/barts-responds-to-criticisms-i.html
[9]	Barr, F. (2009) Probe into lost appointment bookings at Barts. Accessed on 26 January 2009. http://www.e-health-insider.com/News/4509/probe_into_lost_appointment_bookings_at_barts
[10]	Collins, T. (2008) Long-term NPfIT users lacked confidence in CRS data. Accessed on 1 December 2008. http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/12/trust-users-criticise-npfit-ce.html
[11]	Hoeksma, J. (2009) March before Royal Free fixes assessed. Accessed on 10 February 2009. http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/4563/march_before_royal_free_crs_fixes_assessed
[12]	Hoeksma, J. (2008) Royal Free says Cerner “extremely challenging”. Accessed on 7 August 2008. http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/4037/royal_free_says_cerner_%E2%80%98extremely_challenging%E2%80%99
[13]	Protti, D.J. (2009) The benefits of a single “national” health record have been demonstrated. http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/newsroom/worldview/protti4
[14]	Hoeksma, J. (2009) Cerner UK announces redundancies. Accessed on 19 May 2009. http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/4853/cerner_uk_announces_redundancies
[15]	(2009) Putting pharmacists at the forefront of healthcare. http://www.aah.co.uk/aah-home/pharmacy-it-solutions/linkevolution/nhs-crs.aspx
[16]	Graumlich, J.F., Novotny, N.L., Nace, G.S. and Aldag, J.C. (2009) Patient and physician perceptions after software-assisted hospital discharge: Cluster randomized trial. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 4, 356-363.