PSYCH> Vol.2 No.5, August 2011

Constructing a Coactivation Model for Explaining Humor Elicitation

DownloadDownload as PDF (Size:306KB) Full-Text HTML PP. 477-485   DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.25074

ABSTRACT

The present study first aimed to construct a coactivation model that integrates cognitive and motivational variables that determine an individual’s conscious humor experience. It then aimed to test the model’s reliability, validity, and generalizability. As part of the study, 16 (out of 48) four-frame cartoons were randomly presented to 201 (42 male and 159 female) high school students and 302 (185 male and 117 female) undergraduate and graduate students (age range was 15 to 23, M = 18.15, SD = 1.79) who were instructed to rate items related to the variable humor. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), the generalizability of the model to predict the humor experience to a great extent within different population samples was shown. Furthermore, the theoretical prediction of the coactivation model was supported. The results are discussed from the viewpoint of future research that could demonstrate the possible application of the coactivation model.

KEYWORDS


Cite this paper

Nomura, R. & Maruno, S. (2011). Constructing a Coactivation Model for Explaining Humor Elicitation. Psychology, 2, 477-485. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.25074.

References

[1] Apter, M. J. (1982). The experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals. New York, NY: Academic Press.
[2] Averill, J. R. (1969). Autonomic response patterns during sadness and mirth. Psychophysiology, 5, 399-414. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1969.tb02840.x
[3] Cantor, J. R., Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1974). Enhancement of humor appreciation by transferred excitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 812-821. doi:10.1037/h0037543
[4] Chapman, A. J. (1973). An electromyographic study of apprehension about evaluation. Psychological Reports, 33, 811-814.
[5] Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316, 71-74. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02387-4
[6] Cunningham, W. A., & Derks, P. (2005). Humor appreciation and latency of comprehension. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18, 389-403. doi:10.1515/humr.2005.18.4.389
[7] Deckers, L. H. (1993). On the validity of a weight-judging paradigm for the study of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 6, 43-56. doi:10.1515/humr.1993.6.1.43
[8] Ferro-Luzzi, G. E. (1997). On unnecessary incongruities. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 10, 117-120.
[9] Forabosco, G. (2008). Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of uumor research? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4, 45-62. doi:10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5
[10] Gervais, M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: A synthetic approach. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80, 395-430. doi:10.1086/498281
[11] Goldstein, J. H., Harman, J., McGhee, P. E., & Karasik, R. (1975). Test of an information -processing model of humor: Physiological response changes during problem- and riddle-solving. Journal of General Psychology, 92, 59-68. doi:10.1080/00221309.1975.9711328
[12] Hayashi, K., Hayashi, T., Iwanaga, S., Kawai, K., Ishii, H., Shoji, H., & Murakami, K. (2003). Laughter lowered the increase in postprandial blood glucose. Diabetes Care, 26, 1651-1652. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.5.1651
[13] Herzog, T. R., & Anderson, M. R. (2000). Joke cruelty, emotional responsiveness and joke appreciation. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 13, 333-352. doi:10.1515/humr.2000.13.3.333
[14] Herzog, T. R., Harris, A. C., Kropscott, L. S., & Fuller, K. L. (2006). Joke cruelty and joke appreciation revisited. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19, 139-156. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2006.007
[15] Hilson, T. R., & Martin, R. A. (1994). What’s so funny about that?: The domains-interaction approach as a model of incongruity and resolution in humor. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 1-29. doi:10.1007/BF02252473
[16] Ito, H. (2007). The cognitive and emotional process through which one experiences humor: Toward an integration of two models in incongruity theories. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 14, 118-132.
[17] Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71-115. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4
[18] Kano, Y., & Azuma Y. (2003). Use of SEM programs to precisely measure scale reliability. In H. Yanai et al. (Eds.), New developments in psychometrics. Tokyo: Springer Verlag.
[19] Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
[20] Langevin, R., & Day, H. I. (1972). Physiological correlation of humor. In J. H. Goldstein and P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. New York, NY: Academic Press.
[21] Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[22] Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press.
[23] McCauley, C., Woods, K., Coolidge, C., & Kulick, W. (1983). More aggressive cartoons are funnier. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 817-823. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.817
[24] Nerhardt, G. (1970). Humor and inclination to laugh: Emotional reactions to stimuli of different divergence from a range of expectancy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 185-195. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1970.tb00734.x
[25] Nomura, R., & Maruno, S. (2008a). Modeling of a humor elicitation process in vaudeville settings. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Ja- panese Cognitive Science Society, 15, 188-201.
[26] Nomura, R., & Maruno, S. (2008b). An integration of humor generation theories and a proposal of Dynamical Comprehension and Elaboration Theory. Japanese Psychological Review, 51, 500-525.
[27] Pollio, H. R., & Mers, R. W. (1974). Predictability and the appreciation of comedy. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 229-232.
[28] Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
[29] Ruch, W. (1993). Exhilaration and humor. In M. Lewis and J. M. Haviland (Eds)., Handbook of emotions (pp. 605-616). New York, NY: Gulford.
[30] Ruch, W. (2008). Psychology of humor. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The primer of humor research. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110198492.17
[31] Ruef, A. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2007). Continuous measurement of emotion. In J. A. Coan and Allen, J. J. B. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.
[32] Schachter, S., & Wheeler, L. (1962). Epinephrine, chlorpromazine, and amusement. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 65, 121- 128. doi:10.1037/h0040391
[33] Shultz, T. R. (1972). The role of incongruity and resolution in children’s appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 456-477. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(72)90074-4
[34] Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In J. H. Goldstein and P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. New York, NY: Academic Press.
[35] Wyer, R. S., & Collins, J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99, 663-688. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.663
[36] Zillmann, D., Bryant, J., & Cantor, J. R. (1974). Brutality of assault in political cartoons affecting humor appreciation. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 334-345. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(74)90055-5
[37] Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher and M. J. Traxler (Eds.), Handbook of psychoinguis- cs (pp. 725-764). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50019-5

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.