PSYCH> Vol.2 No.5, August 2011

Social Identification Dimensions as Mediators of the Effect of Prototypicality on Intergroup Behaviours

DownloadDownload as PDF (Size:225KB)  HTML    PP. 426-432  

ABSTRACT

Cameron (2004) proposed a three-dimensional model and measure of social identification consisting of cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and in-group ties. This approach has received growing theoretical and empirical support; however, little research has examined how these dimensions of social identification may relate differentially to intergroup outcome behaviors. The current research sought to address this question by examining the possible mediating role the dimensions of social identification on the relationship between prototypicality of group members and the intergroup outcome behaviors of in-group favoritism, out-group derogation, and collective self-esteem. The current study examined university students’ (N = 235) feelings towards students from their own and another local university. Structural equation modeling was used to identify the most appropriate and parsimonious models of these pathways. The results showed support for the utility of measuring social identification using a multidimensional approach with unique meditational pathways emerging for the distinct intergroup behaviors.

Cite this paper

Obst, P. , White, K. , Mavor, K. & Baker, R. (2011). Social Identification Dimensions as Mediators of the Effect of Prototypicality on Intergroup Behaviours. Psychology, 2, 426-432. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.25066.

References

[1] Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organisation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
[2] Ashmore, R., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organiz- ing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
[3] Bilewicz, M., & Wójcik, A. (2010). Does identification predict community involvement? Exploring consequences of social identifi- cation among the Jewish minority in Poland. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 72-79. doi:10.1177/0095798400026002006
[4] Boatswain, S. J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2000). Social identity and preferred ethnic/racial labels for Blacks in Canada. Journal of Black Psychol- ogy, 26, 216-234. doi:10.1177/0095798400026002006
[5] Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of out-group derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240603
[6] Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
[7] Brown, R. (2000). Social Identity Theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psy- chology, 30, 745-778. doi:10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<745::AID-EJSP24>3.0.CO;2-O
[8] Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organisation. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 279-304. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00230.x
[9] Cameron, J. E. (1999). Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: Implications for the psychological well-being of university students. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 179-189. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.3.3.179
[10] Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239-262. doi:10.1080/13576500444000047
[11] Cameron, J. E., & Lalonde, R. N. (2001). Social identification and gender-related ideology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 59-77. doi:10.1348/014466601164696
[12] Castano, E., Paladino, M., Coull, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (2002). Protecting the in-group stereotype: In-group identification and the management of deviant in-group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 365-385. doi:10.1348/014466602760344269
[13] Corenblum, B., & Stephen, W. (2001). White fears and native appre- hensions: An integrated threat theory approach to intergroup attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 251-268. doi:10.1037/h0087147
[14] Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60-67. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.60
[15] Deaux, K. (1996). Social Identification. In E. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777-798). New York: Guilford.
[16] Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explana- tions and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 263-292). Chichester, England: Wiley.
[17] Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 31, 410-436. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.60
[18] Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-catego- risation, commitment to the group, and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U
[19] Giguere, B. & Lalande, R. (2010). Why do students strike? Direct and indirect determinants of collective action participation. Political Psychology, 31, 227-247. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00750.x
[20] Gurin, P., & Markus, H. (1989). Cognitive consequences of gender identity. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 152-172). London: Sage.
[21] Harris, G. E., & Cameron, J. E. (2005). Multiple dimensions of organ- isational identification and commitment as predictors of turnover in- tentions and psychological well-being. Canadian Journal of Behav- ioural Science, 37, 159-169. doi:10.1037/h0087253
[22] Harris, G., Cameron, J., & Lang, J. (2011), Identification with commu- nity-based HIV agencies as a correlate of turnover intentions and general self-efficacy. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 41-54
[23] Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, D.L., & Crook, K. F. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multi- component approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 305-317. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00874.x
[24] Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 246-276. doi:10.1177/1046496404263424
[25] Hogg, M. A., & Williams, K. D. (2000). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: Social iden- tity and the collective self. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 81-97. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.81
[26] Jackson, J. W. (2002). Intergroup attitudes as a function of different dimensions of group identification and perceived intergroup conflict. Self and Identity, 1, 11-33. doi:10.1080/152988602317232777
[27] Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. (1997). Distinctiveness threat and prototypicality: Combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 635-657. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199711/12)27:6<635::AID-EJSP835>3.0.CO;2-#
[28] Karasawa, M. (1991). Towards an assessment of social identity: The structure of group identification and its effects on in-group evalua- tions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 293 - 307.
[29] Leach, C., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M., Pennekamp, S., Doosje, B., Ouwerkerk, J., Spears, R. (2008). Self-definition and self-investment: A multi component model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
[30] Lindeman, M. (1997). In-group bias, self-enhancement, and group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 337-355. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199705)27:3<337::AID-EJSP825>3.0.CO;2-S
[31] Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psy- chology Bulletin, 18, 302-318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006
[32] Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.
[33] Obst, P. L., Smith, S. G., & Zinkiewicz, L. (2002). An exploration of sense of community, Part 3: Dimensions and predictors of psycho- logical sense of community in geographical communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 119-133. doi:10.1002/jcop.1054
[34] Obst, P. L., & White, K. M. (2005). Three-dimensional strength of identification across group memberships: A confirmatory factor analysis. Self and Identity, 4, 69-80. doi:10.1080/13576500444000182
[35] Obst, P. L., Zinkiewicz, L., & Smith, S. G. (2002). Sense of community in science fiction fandom, Part 2: Comparing neighbourhood and in- terest group sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 105-117. doi:10.1002/jcop.1053
[36] Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad and the manly: Threats to one’s prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 510-517. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1476
[37] Smith, E., Murphy, J., & Coates, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 77, 94-110. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.94
[38] Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1993). Cognition and affect in stereotyping: Parallel interactive networks. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in-group perception (pp. 111-136). Orlando, FL: Aca- demic Press.
[39] Stryker, S. (1987). Identity theory: Developments and extensions. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and identity: Psychosocial perspec- tives (pp. 89-103). New York: Wiley
[40] Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
[41] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
[42] Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
[43] Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[44] Verkuyten, M., & Nekuee, S. (1999). In-group bias: The effect of self- stereotyping, identification and group threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 411-418. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<411::AID-EJSP952>3.0.CO;2-8
[45] Vivien, J., Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1995). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership Sali- ence. Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 342-364.
[46] Wann, D. L., & Grieve, F. G. (2005). Biased evaluations of in-group and out-group spectator behaviour at sporting events: The impor- tance of team identification and threats to social identity. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 531-546. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.5.531-546

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.