Microbial Removal of Phenol and P-Chlorophenol from Industrial Waste Water Using Rhodococcus sp.RSP8 and Its Growth Kinetic Modeling

Pronoy Kumar Sinha, Arpita Sinha, Manas Das

.

DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2011.38073                

Abstract

A phenol-degrading microorganism, Rhodococcus sp.RSP8, was used to study the substrate interactions during cell growth on phenol and p-chlorophenol dual substrates. Both phenol and p-chlorophenol could be utilized by the bacteria as the sole carbon and energy sources. When cells grew on the mixture of phenol and p-chlorophenol, strong substrate interactions were observed. The p-chlorophenol inhibited the degradation of phenol, on the other hand, phenol also inhibited the utilization of p-chlorophenol. The overall cell growth rate depends on the co-actions of phenol and p-chlorophenol. In addition, the cell growth and substrate degradation kinetics of phenol, p-chlorophenol as single and mixed substrates for Rhodococcus sp.RSP8 in batch cultures were also investigated over a wide range of initial phenol concentrations (5-1600 mg.L^–1) and initial p-chlorophenol concentrations (5 – 250 mg.L^–1). The single-substrate kinetics was described well using the Haldane-type kinetic models, with model constants of µ_m1 = 0.15 h^–1, K_S1 = 2.22 mg.L^–1 and K_i1 = 245.37 mg.L^–1 for cell growth on phenol and of µ_m2 = 0.0782 h^–1, K_S2 = 1.30 mg.L^–1 and K_i2 = 71.77 mg.L^–1, K′_i2 = 5480 (mg.L^–1)² for cell growth on p-chlorophenol. Proposed cell growth kinetic model was used to characterize the substrates interactions in the dual substrates system.

Keywords

Rhodococcus sp.RSP8, Biodegradation, Phenol; p-chlorophenol, Inhibition, Kinetics

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Z. Alexievaa, M. Gerginova, P. Zlateva and N. Peneva, “Comparision of Growth Kinetics and Phenol Metabolizing Enzymes of Trichosporn Cutaneum R57 and Mutants with Modified Degradation Abilities,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Vol. 34, No. 3-4, 2004, pp. 242-247. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.10.010
[2]	K. Bandhyopadhyay, D. Das, P. Bhattacharyya and B. R. Maiti, “Reaction Engineering Studies on Biodegradation of Phenol by Pseudomonas Putida MTCC 1194 Immobilized on Calcium Alginate,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2001, pp. 179-186. doi:10.1016/S1369-703X(01)00101-2
[3]	W. Sokol, “Oxidation of an Inhibitory Substrate by Washed Cells (Oxidation of Phenol by Pseudomonas Putida),” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 30, 1987, pp. 921-921. doi:10.1002/bit.260300802
[4]	R. D. Yang and A. E. Humphrey, “Dynamic and Steady State Studies of Phenol Biodegradation in Pure and Mixed Cultures,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 17, No. 8, 1975, pp. 1211-1235. doi:10.1002/bit.260170809
[5]	Z. Aleksieva, D. Ivanova, T. Godjevargova and B. Atanasov, “Degradation of Some Phenol Derivatives by Trichosporon Cutaneum R57,” Process Biochemistry, Vol. 37, No. 11, 2002, pp. 1215-1219. doi:10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00336-3
[6]	K. Gunther, D. Schlosser and W. Fritsche, “Phenol and Cresol Metabolism in Bacillus Pumilus Isolate from Contaminated Groundwater,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1995, pp. 83-92. doi:10.1002/jobm.3620350205
[7]	C. Hinteregger, R. Leitner, M. Loidl, A. Ferschi and F. Stereichsbier, “Degradation of Phenol and Phenolic Compounds by Pseuedomonas Putida EKP,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1992, pp. 252-259.
[8]	J. Nielsen, J. Villdsen and G. Liden, “Bioreaction Engineering Principles,” 2nd Edition, Chinese Chemical Industry Pub, Beijing, 2002.
[9]	E. B. James and F. O. David, “Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals,” 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Pub, US, 1986.
[10]	H. Yong, G. Klinzing and H. W. Blanch, “Competition for Mixed Substrates by Microbial Populations,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 19, No. 8, 1977, pp. 1193-1210. doi:10.1002/bit.260190809
[11]	H. Feitkenhauer, S. Schnicke, R. Muller and H. Markl, “Kinetic Parameters of Continuous Cultures of Bacillus Thermoleovorans sp.A2 Degrading Phenol,” Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 103, No. 2, 2003, pp. 129-135. doi:10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00105-6
[12]	D. Leonard, D. Nicholas and Lindley, “Growth of Ralstonia Eutropha on Inhibitory Concentrations of Phenol: Diminished Growth Can Be Attributed to Hydrophobic Perturbation of Phenol Hydroxylase Activity,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1999, pp. 271-277.doi:10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00039-3
[13]	M. Kibret, W. Somitsch and K. H. Robra, “Characterization of a Phenol Degrading Mixed Population by Enzyme Assay,” Water Research, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1127-1134. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00248-1
[14]	F. Zeng, K. Y. Cui, J. M. Fu, G. Y. Sheng and H. F. Yang, “Biodegradability of Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate by Pse- udomonas Fluorescens FS1,” Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, Vol. 140, No. 1-4, 2002, pp. 297-305. doi:10.1023/A:1020108502776
[15]	P. J. Allsop, Y. Chisti, M. Moo-Young and G. R. Sullivan, “Dynamics of Phenol Degradation by Pseudomonas Putida,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 41, No. 5, 1993, pp. 572-580. doi:10.1002/bit.260410510
[16]	B. M. Peytona, T. Wilsona and D. R. Yonge, “Kinetics of Phenol Biodegradation in High Salt Solutions,” Water Research, Vol. 36, No. 19, 2002, pp. 4811-4820. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00200-2
[17]	S. J. Wang and K. C. Loh, “Modeling the Role of Metabolic Intermediates in Kinetics of Phenol Biodegradation,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Vol. 25, No. 3-5, 1999, pp. 177-184. doi:10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00060-5
[18]	T. Abuhamed, E. Bayraktar, T. Mehmetoglu and U. Mehmetoglu, “Kinetics Model for Growth of Pseudomonas Putida F1 during Benzene, Toluene and Phenol Biodegradation,” Process Biochemistry, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2004, pp. 983-988. doi:10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00210-3