Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) in the Differential for Fulminant Hepatic Failure ()
1. Introduction
Fulminant hepatic failure affects approximately 2000 people in the United States annually. Drug-related causes account for more than 50% of the cases of hepatic failure, with viruses and autoimmune causes representing much of the remainder of the cases. HSV is fairly ubiquitous in the United States, with seroprevalence among those 14 - 49 years of age at 62% for HSV-1 and 17.2% for HSV-2 [1] . However, HSV-induced hepatic failure is rare, and has been estimated to account for approximately 1% of all causes of fulminant hepatic failure [2] . Despite being first described in 1969 [3] , herpes simplex hepatitis has been an often unrecognized form of fulminant hepatic failure which is rapidly (within days) fatal and with mortality rate approaching 90% [4] . Most case reports have shown to be in patients who are immunocompromised, frequently pregnant women in 3rd trimester, newborns, or patients otherwise immunosuppressed either by HIV or by immunomodulatory agents treating other diseases. Here we present a case of HSV-induced fulminant hepatic failure in an otherwise immunocompetent male.
2. Case Presentation
We present a case of a 66-year-old immunocompetent Hispanic male who developed herpes hepatitis after surgery for removal of a pituitary mass. The patient had a past medical history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and skin cancer. He had no known history of immunosuppression or opportunistic infections. He presented to neurosurgery clinic with complaint of 10 days of headache and diplopia, where physical exam revealed right-sided cranial nerve (CN) III palsy and diplopia with left lateral gaze. He had been previously diagnosed with a pituitary mass four years prior, which had been treated with bromocriptine up to that point. CT scan and MRI showed 2.8 cm × 1.8 cm sella mass extending into the sphenoid sinus with lateral extension into the cavernous sinus. Surgical intervention with transnasal transphenoidal hypophysectomy with stereotactic guidance and abdominal fat graft was planned.
One day preoperatively, the patient was admitted to the hospital and started on hydrocortisone 100 mg IV q8h. Laboratory evaluation at that time showed INR 1.1, PTT 27, Platelets 190, Hematocrit 41, with pituitary panel revealing normal random serum cortisol but low prolactin, TSH, T3, T4, and testosterone levels. The operation proceeded uneventfully. However, toward the end of the procedure the surgeon noted persistent oozing in mucosa and bone edges that was difficult to control. Coagulation studies were sent intra-operatively and were markedly abnormal. Patient was given fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and vitamin K for elevated INR and PTT. Eventually hemostasis was achieved and patient was extubated in the OR. He was following complex commands and moving all 4 extremities before he was taken to the PACU in the afternoon. Physical exam did not show any jaundice or abdominal pain and patient had normal vital signs without a fever. Due to his intra-operative course additional coagulation studies were ordered that showed significant thrombocytopenia in addition to elevated prothrombin times. He was subsequently transfused platelets, additional FFP and packed red blood cells, a hematology consult was ordered and patient was planned for an intensive care unit (ICU) stay to fully work up his coagulopathy.
The patient developed hypoxic respiratory failure several hours after transfer to the Neurosurgical ICU and was emergently intubated, after which his hypoxia improved. On post-op day 1, patient was noted to have transaminitis which was steadily rising and coagulopathy causing increased bleeding and anemia despite multiple units of FFP, platelets, and packed red blood cells. Additionally, the patient developed acute renal failure and metabolic acidosis. He was evaluated by the hepatology service and was not felt to be a candidate for transplant at that time, due to instability and possibly active infection. Despite aggressive intervention, including broad-spectrum antibiotics for concern for sepsis, the patient’s condition continued to decline and he suffered PEA arrest on post-operative day 2. He had return of spontaneous circulation after two rounds of CPR and epinephrine, and was started on vasopressors to maintain blood pressure and Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration (CVVH) was initiated for worsening renal function. Laboratory evaluation was unable to identify the source of his fulminant hepatic failure and coagulopathy. On post-operative day 3, after continued decline of the patient’s function, the family made the decision to withdraw care, and the patient expired. Specific laboratory values for the patient are described in Table 1.
Post-mortem examination revealed coagulopathy with striking thrombocytopenia without evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) likely due to massive hemorrhagic hepatic viral necrosis and a focal area of lung with HSV viral infection. Other findings included hemorrhagic bowel mucosa with bilateral serosanguinous pleural effusions, focal acute basal ganglia hemorrhage, and focal subarachnoid hemorrhage along with early ischemic changes. The right lower lung lobe had a 4 cm ill-defined firm abscess microscopically composed of acute inflammation, hemorrhage, necrosis, and distinctive viral cytopathic effect similar to that in the liver. Although the viral changes were observed throughout the liver parenchyma, the viral changes in the lungs were limited to the right lower lung lobe abscess. The remainder of the lung parenchyma had mild to moderate congestion, but no other significant inflammation or necrosis. None of the other organs or tissues
Note that patient received multiple units of FFP, platelets, and pRBCs during hospital stay. *Pre-op patient was on steroids.
examined showed any signs of viral infection, inflammation or necrosis, including the central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, larynx and trachea. Viral inclusions were presents and presence of HSV was confirmed with immunohistochemical stain. The liver was slightly enlarged (2128 grams, reference range, 1500 - 1800 grams), and had firm, dark red parenchyma. Microscopically, the liver parenchyma was diffusely necrotic (Fig- ure 1), with minimal cellular detail, and with abundant parenchymal hemorrhage. Many of the viable hepatocytes had enlarged, deeply basophilic nuclei with the characteristic “ground glass” chromatin pattern that in some instances resemble ground glass nuclear inclusions (Figure 2). Other nuclei had the characteristic punctate, granular chromatin pattern (Figure 3). Although the histologic features are quite characteristic of herpes virus infection, this was confirmed with an HSV immunohistochemical stain (Figure 4). These nuclear changes are commonly refered to as “viral cytopathic effect,” and were observed in essentially all sections of the liver examined.
3. Discussion
The low prevalence of HSV-induced hepatic failure leads to low clinical suspicion and the diagnosis often being missed. One review showed that only 26% of non-pregnant and 33% of pregnant patients with HSV hepatitis were diagnosed antemortem [5] , with others estimating the antemortem diagnosis only as high as 42% [6] . However, HSV-induced FHF remains one of the few treatable causes of fulminant hepatic failure. It has been shown that the percentage of patients progressing to death or liver transplantation from HSV hepatitis can be reduced from 88% to 51% with acyclovir treatment [6] ; another case series of 14 patients showed survival of 72% (10/14) with early initiation of acyclovir [7] . Because of its rapidly fatal course, early recognition and clinical suspicion are vital to improve clinical outcomes.
Treatment of HSV-induced fulminant hepatic failure starts first with diagnosis. Unfortunately, less than 50% of patients present with typical mucocutaneous lesions for HSV [8] . As in our patient, clinical signs include anicteric hepatitis in almost 90% of patients, wherein normal or mildly elevated bilirubin levels are accompanied by transaminase levels 100 - 1000 times normal levels often with AST > ALT. In addition, patients present with leukopenia and thrombocytopenia along with fever, flu-like symptoms and abdominal pain [9] . When trying to ascertain a diagnosis, serum HSV antibodies can often take too long to return and are often non-specific. Liver biopsy, while the gold standard for diagnosis, is often precluded by a significant coagulopathy. It has been shown that HSV DNA using PCR analysis is a useful diagnostic tool and furthermore often correlates with disease severity [9] , calling for its use over non-specific HSV anti-IgM and anti-IgG.
The most commonly reported patients with HSV fulminant hepatic failure have been pregnant patients (especially in 3rd trimester) or patients who are immunosuppressed. In a case series of 137 patients by Norvell, et al., 30% were on immunosuppressive medications for liver transplantion, 23% were on immunosuppressive medications for other reasons, and 23% were pregnant; however, in 24%, no immunodeficiency was found. Similar to our patient, HSV hepatic failure has been reported after surgery, in one case post-thymectomy [10] . It is unclear if the pathology of HSV hepatitis is by reactivation of dormant virus or reinfection with another strain of virus. In our case, the surgery itself may have predisposed the patient to relative post-surgical immunosuppression, or the pre-operative hydrocortisone may have made him susceptible. In addition, the patient had been treated with bromocriptine, which may reduce lymphocyte reactivity and predispose to infection [11] . Because of low clinical suspicion in this presumed immunocompetent male, treatment was not initiated.
![]()
Figure 1. Low power view of liver parenchyma composed predominantly of necrotic and diffusely hemorrrhagic tissue; a focal are of viable tissue is in the left aspect of the image (hematoxylin and eosin, 40× magnification).
![]()
Figure 2. Medium power view of liver parenchyma demonstrating the inclusion-like ground glass change in an enlarged hepatic nucleus. The surrounding parenchyma is completely necrotic (hematoxylin and eosin, 200× magnification).
As mentioned above, treatment with acyclovir improves survival outcomes. While doses vary in case presentations, acyclovir 10 mg/kg, with adjustment for renal function if necessary, has often been used. Review of the case reports shows that improved survival seems to correlate with earlier diagnosis and treatment. Given the rapidly fatal course of HSV-induced fulminant hepatic failure and the relatively low side effect profile of acyclovir, some have recommended empiric use of acyclovir in non-acetaminophen related acute liver failure patients while awaiting test results [7] . In some patients, fulminant hepatic failure progresses, and orthotopic liver transplantation is required for survival. One-year survival rates after liver transplantation have been reported to be around 40% [4] . However, because HSV sepsis is a systemic illness, patient’s requiring liver transplantation from fulminant liver failure have increased risk of HSV recurrence and lifelong treatment with acyclovir is recommended [4] . However, viral resistance to acyclovir has been reported [12] leading some to suggest using foscarnet in the setting of acute liver failure in the immunosuppressed patient after OLT [4] .
![]()
Figure 3. Medium power view of liver parenchyma demonstrating the punctate, granular chromatin in infected hepatic nuclei. The surrounding parenchyma is also completely necrotic (hematoxylin and eosin, 200× magnification).
![]()
Figure 4. Medium power view of liver parenchyma stained with anti- HSV antibodies demonstrating abundant virus in hepatic nuclei (dense brown) and less dense staining in hepatic cytoplasm (pale brown). The counter stain is blue, showing many nuclei in this field negative for HSV viral particles.
4. Conclusions
Herpes simplex fulminant hepatic failure, while rare, is rapidly fatal and is one of the treatable causes of fulminant hepatic failure. Early therapy has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. High clinical suspicion in the setting of acute liver failure is necessary, and should be especially considered in patients presenting with anicteric hepatitis. While pregnancy and immunosuppression are common risk factor characteristics, almost 1 in every 4 patients reported with HSV hepatitis is immunocompetent. Because of its improvement in clinical outcomes, and low side effect profile and cost, IV acyclovir should be considered empirically in all patients presenting with non-acetaminophen acute liver failure.
Pathology Teaching Point: Although the viral cytopathic effects of herpes simplex virus infection are quite characteristic, in some cases, extensive necrosis or balloon degeneration of hepatocytes can make the diagnosis more challenging. In such cases, confirmation with an immunohistochemical stain directed at HSV can be very helpful. Other viruses within the herpesvirus family can also elicit distinctive cytopathic changes, such as the CMV inclusion body, and again, immunohistochemical stains can be very helpful in distinguishing specific viral etiologies. In the absence of immunohistochemistry, other diagnostic tests may be necessary (such as PCR) to identify the causative agent.
Critical Care Teaching Point: In critically ill patients, diagnostic and therapeutic measures often must occur simultaneously, not sequentially. This case shows the importance of considering even rare causes of acute deterioration, in this case HSV hepatitis. While aggressive supportive care is critical, initiation of broad-based therapy allows multiple possible etiologies to be treated while diagnostic studies pending. In the patient who has a rare disease, the incidence of that disease is 100%.