IL-10 Gene Knockout Reduces the Expression of mGlu Receptor 1a/b and Decreases the Glutamate-Dependent Production of Nitric Oxide

Abstract

IL-10 provides trophic and survival effects directly on neurons, promotes axonal outgrowth, and stimulates neuroregeneration. In this study, we analyzed the activities of arginase and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in synaptoneurosomes derived from brain cortex of C57BL/6 IL-10 gene-knockout (KO) and wild-type (Wt) mice and determined that the synaptoneurosomes derived from KO mice present lower arginase II activity and lower spermine content than those derived from Wt mice, whereas the basal NOS activity in the KO synaptoneurosomes was higher than that observed in the control synaptoneurosomes. Moreover, our results indicate that the plasma membranes isolated from the KO mice brain exhibit significantly lower spermine-induced enhancement of [3H] MK-801 binding than the plasma membranes from the brain of Wt mice. Glutamate increases the production of nitric oxide (NO) in Wt synaptoneurosomes in a dose-dependent manner, whereas in the KO synaptoneurosomes, this amino acid does not affect the synthesis of NO. The glutamate-dependent acceleration of NO synthesis in Wt synaptoneurosomes was abrogated by LY367385, an antagonist of mGluR1a/b. The western blot analysis of the synaptoneurosomal proteins demonstrates that the expression of the subunits of NMDAR (NMDAR2A and NMDAR2B), the level of NMDAR-bound nNOS and the expression of iNOS are not changed in KO mice and that only the level of mGluR1a/b is markedly reduced in the synaptoneurosomes of KO mice. We conclude that a neuroprotective and neuroregenerative property of IL-10, in addition to its effects on polyamine metabolism and the spermine-dependent modulation of NMDAR, may involve the regulation of mGluR1a/b expression.

Share and Cite:

Koriauli, S. , Barbakadze, T. , Natsvlishvili, N. , Dabrundashvili, N. , Kvaratskhelia, E. and Mikeladze, D. (2014) IL-10 Gene Knockout Reduces the Expression of mGlu Receptor 1a/b and Decreases the Glutamate-Dependent Production of Nitric Oxide. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 7, 1019-1029. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2014.713099.

1. Introduction

It has been demonstrated that interleukin-10 (IL-10), an anti-inflammatory cytokine, provides trophic and survival effects directly to neurons, modulates neurite plasticity and outgrowth, and has a pivotal importance in neuroregeneration [1] -[4] . These effects of IL-10 are mediated by direct interactions with the neuronal IL-10 receptor and are distinct from the known anti-inflammatory actions of this cytokine on immune cells [5] . One of the targets of IL-10 is the arginase gene, the expression of which is strongly induced in a STAT-3 dependent manner [6] . Arginase, an enzyme of the urea cycle, has two isozymes: types I and II. Arginase I is a cytoplasmic protein that is primarily expressed in the liver, whereas arginase II is a mitochondrial protein with a widespread tissue distribution [7] . The function of arginase is to convert L-arginine to L-ornithine, a precursor in the production of polyamines. Polyamines play a fundamental role in the developing nervous system: the inhibition of polyamine biosynthesis results in defects in neuronal morphogenesis, whereas exogenous polyamines stimulate axonal regeneration [8] . Polyamines play important roles in the maintenance of normal neuronal function by regulating the neurotransmitter receptor and modulating learning and memory. Polyamines also influence neurotransmission by interacting with ionotropic (e.g., NMDAR-N-methyl-D-aspartate type of glutamate receptor) glutamate receptors [9] - [11] .

The increased expression of arginase accompanied by the resulting degradation of the NO precursor arginine would decrease NO generation by NOS (nitric oxide synthase) and thus potentially protect neurons and axons [12] [13] . In the surviving motor neuron subpopulations, NO production may be impaired by the low levels of arginine caused by the high basal activity of arginase, which suggests that the ability of nitric oxide to reach a toxic level depends on the balance between neuronal NOS and arginase activity [12] [14] [15] . It is well established that NO synthesis in neurons is regulated predominantly by glutamate receptors. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), through its interaction with PSD-95 with NMDAR-NR2B, can be efficiently activated by NMDAR-mediated Ca2+ influx [16] . Ca2+-dependent nNOS activation leads to nitric oxide (NO) production, which may be toxic when found in excess and combined with other reactive oxygen species (ROS). In addition, the activation of mGluRs (metabotropic glutamate receptors) in neurons may result in the release of high levels of Ca2+ from intracellular compartments, which can also contribute to Ca2+-dependent regulatory processes [17] . Many studies indicate that mGluRs activation leads to neuroprotection or excitotoxicity [18] - [20] , which suggests that these receptors may constitute a promising multipotential therapeutic approach [21] .

We hypothesize that the beneficial effects of IL-10 on neurons depend on the upregulation of arginase genes, which may be potentially neuroprotective by enhancing polyamine biosynthesis and reducing the concentration of NO. Moreover, we hypothesize that the action of IL-10 may involve the modulation of glutamate-dependent NO generation. To investigate the action of glutamate on the production of NO in C57BL/6 IL-10 gene knockout (KO) and wild-type (Wt) mice, we used synaptoneurosomes as a model system. Synaptoneurosome preparations contain a population of presynaptic and postsynaptic structures [22] that retain the ability to display many of the molecular effects that characterize the intact brain, including neurotransmitter release, receptor-mediated signal transduction, and protein synthesis [23] . Synaptoneurosome preparations provide an excellent model for the study of glutamate-dependent biochemical responses in nervous tissue [24] - [26] .

In this study, we found that the synaptoneurosomes derived from the brain cortex of KO mice present decreased glutamate-dependent NO synthesis compared with the synaptoneurosomes from Wt animals, and this reduction in NO synthesis is due to the weak expression of mGluR1a/b in KO mice. Furthermore, we observe that the KO synaptoneurosomes exhibit lower mitochondrial activity of arginase II and a lower content of spermine in the synaptoplasma compared with the corresponding Wt fractions, whereas the basal NOS activity in the KO synaptoneurosomes is higher than that found in the Wt synaptoneurosomes. In addition, our results indicate that the levels of the NMDAR subunits (NR2A and NR2B) in plasma membranes isolated from the brain cortex of KO mice is not changed compared with those from Wt mice; however, the plasma membranes from KO mice present a significantly lower spermine enhancement of [3H] MK-801 binding than the plasma membranes from the brain cortex of Wt mice. These data suggest that IL-10, through both mGluR1-dependent pathways and polyamine biosynthesis, can regulate NO metabolism in neurons and that this effect may signify a neuroprotective and neuroregenerative action of IL-10.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All of the reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., USA) unless otherwise specified. Monoclonal antibodies against NMDAR-2A, NMDAR-2B, mGluR1a/b, iNOS, and nNOS were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

2.2. Animals and social conditions

Male C57BL/6J wild-type and IL-10-deficient C57BL/6J mice (mice homozygous for the IL10tm1Cgn targeted mutation, 8 - 12 weeks of age) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and maintained by the Institute of Medical Biotechnology of Tbilisi State Medical University (Tbilisi, Georgia). These IL-10 mutant mice are viable and fertile under specific pathogen free conditions. IL-10-deficient phenotype is associated with altered lymphocyte and myeloid profiles, elevated serum amyloid A levels, altered responses to inflammatory or autoimmune stimuli, increased depressive-like behavior [27] and decreased neuroprotection [28] .

All of the experimental procedures were approved by the Institute of Medical Biotechnology of Tbilisi State Medical University Animal Care and Use Committee.

2.3. Preparation of synaptoneurosomes, synaptoplasma, plasma membranes, and mitochondria

The synaptoneurosomes was prepared according to the method described by Kim et al. [26] with some modifications. Briefly, the mice (N = 6) were decapitated, and their brains were removed and dissected. The cortices were homogenized in homogenizing buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 125 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 100 mM sucrose, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 U/mL aprotinin, and 5 mg/mL pepstatin A (buffer A) using a glass-Teflon homogenizer. The homogenate was filtered through three layers of 100-µm nylon mesh filters and eight layers of 100-µm nylon mesh filters. The final filtrate was centrifuged briefly (4000 × g, 1 min), and the supernatant was centrifuged (7000 × g, 15 min) to pellet the synaptoneurosomes, which were then diluted in buffer A.

To obtain the plasma membrane, synaptoplasma, and mitochondria preparations, the synaptoneurosomes were lysed with 200 µL of 0.1% Triton X-100 at 4˚C for 30 min. The lysate was homogenized with an insulin syringe, and 100 mL of 25 mM Tris-HCl was added. The homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min, the pellet was removed, and the supernatant was centrifuged at 9500 × g for 30 min to obtain the mitochondrial pellet. The post-mitochondrial supernatant was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min, and the pellet was resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 buffer containing 0.1 mM PMSF, 2 mM EDTA, 5 mg/mL pepstatin, and 5 U/mL aprotinin (buffer B) to yield a suspension with a concentration of 5 mg protein/mL and was frozen at −40˚C until use (plasma membrane preparation). The supernatant obtained after the last centrifugation was used as the “synaptoplasma” preparation.

The plasma membrane proteins were solubilized with 1% sodium deoxycholate at a detergent/protein ratio of 4/1 (mg/mg) in buffer B for 1 h at 4˚C and then centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 2 h. The supernatants were used as the solubilized plasma membrane preparations.

2.4. Determination of NOS activity and NO

The NOS activity was determined in medium containing 50 mM K2PO4 buffer, pH 7.2, 400 μM L-arginine, 500 µM NADPH, 0.1 μM calmodulin, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 μM FAD, 2 µM FMN, 10 μM tetrahydrobiopterin, 0.01 U/mL nitrate reductase, and 100 μg of synaptoneurosomal protein. To study the dose-dependent effect of glutamate, the synaptoneurosomes were incubated for 30 min at 37˚C with various concentrations of glutamate (10 - 100 µM). After incubation, the synaptoneurosomes were centrifuged for 20 min at 16,000 × g, and the supernatants were treated with 200 µM 2,3-diaminonapthalene (DAN) and incubated for 10 min at room temperature in the dark before sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was added. The fluorescence was measured using a spectrofluorometer (Jenway Fluorimeter 6200) with maximum excitation and emission wavelengths of 350 nm and 425 nm, respectively.

The total amount of nitric oxide in the synaptoplasma was determined after mixing 500 µL of the clear soluble preparation of synaptoplasma with 100 µL of Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide and 0.1% naphthalene-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in 5% H3PO4). After 15 min, the product formation was colorimetrically (550 nm) determined. As a standard, NaNO2 was reacted with Griess reagent.

2.5. Arginase activity

2.6. MK-801 binding assay

The binding assay was performed in duplicate at room temperature in a volume of 250 µL. Each tube contained 50 µL of the plasma membrane suspension (final protein concentration ~0.4 mg/mL), 2 nM [3H] MK-801, and a range of concentrations of spermine (1 - 10,000 nM) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 50 - 50,000 nM) in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) buffer. Non-specific binding was defined by unlabelled MK-801 at 500 nM. The assays were terminated after 45 min via rapid filtration through Whatman GF/B glass fiber filters. The assay tubes and filters were rapidly washed three times with ice-cold assay buffer. After drying, the filters were transferred to vials and soaked overnight in 5 mL of toluene scintillant. The radioactivity bound to the filters was determined using an LKB Rack-PTM counter with onboard quench correction.

2.7. Measurement of polyamines by HPLC analysis

The content of polyamines in the synaptoplasma was measured according to Sethi et al. [29] with slight modifications. First, 350 - 350 µL of the synaptoplasma was deproteinized with an equal amount of 0.6 N HC1O4, and the mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min. The supernatants were then neutralized with 2N NaOH. After the addition of benzoyl chloride and incubation for 25 min at room temperature, the benzoyl-polyamines were extracted twice in diethyl ether. The extracted layers were dried in a stream of nitrogen, and the remaining residue was dissolved in acetonitrile (100 µL). Then, 20 µL of the samples was analyzed by HPLC at wavelengths of 198, 229, and 254 nm.

The HPLC analysis was conducted using an Agilent 1260 infinity quaternary LC instrument (quaternary pump 1260, autosampler 1290, and UV detector 1260). The samples were injected and separated using a C-18 (Nova-Pac C-18, 4 micron, 3.9 × 150 mm, Waters) column and initially eluted using a gradient elution profile. The elution profile was the following: 20% solvent A (acetonitrile) to 100% A over a 10-min period, 100% A for 3 min, and from 100% A to 20% A over a 2-min period. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min, and the total run time was 17 min.

2.8. Immunoblotting

For the analysis of iNOS, nNOS, NMDAR-2A, NMDAR-2B, and mGluR1a/b, 50 µg of proteins from the synaptoneurosomes was denatured at 90˚C for 5 min, separated by SDS-PAGE on 15% gels, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween 20 in Tris-HCl buffered saline, the membranes were incubated with the corresponding primary antibodies in the blocking solution. The immunolabeled bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences) and analyzed by densitometric scanning. The intensities of the bands were within the linear range of the amount of protein loaded.

The protein concentration was determined through a dye-binding method (Bio-Rad).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using either an unpaired t test or one-way ANOVA and Scheffe’s post hoc analysis when appropriate. The results were considered significant when p < 0.05. The results are expressed as the means ± SEM from at least three independent experiments.

3. Results

3.1. Arginase activity, polyamine and NO levels in KO and Wt synaptoneurosomes

The AI and AII isozymes of arginase were detected in the neurons, and their expression was particularly high in the cerebral cortex [30] . The arginase II isozyme is predominantly found in the mitochondria, and its primary function is thought to be the production of ornithine, which is a precursor in the synthesis of polyamines. Because the expression levels of both types of isozymes are controlled by IL-10 [6] , we first examined the activity of arginase in the mitochondrial and soluble (synaptoplasmic) fractions of the synaptoneurosomes (Figure 1(a)). We found that the activity of the mitochondrial enzyme (AII isozyme) is lower in KO mice compared with Wt mice, whereas the activity of the synaptoplasmic enzyme (AI isozyme) was similar in both mice (data not shown).

Polyamines are the major products of ornithine metabolism. To assess how an alteration in the activity of arginase II is reflected in the metabolism of polyamines, we determined the content of spermine, the end product of polyamine metabolism, in the synaptoplasmic fractions. The HPLC results show that the content of spermine in the synaptoplasma of Wt mice is higher than that found in the synaptoplasma of KO mice (Figure 1(b)). These data suggest that IL-10 deficiency, in addition to reducing arginase activity, down-regulates the synthesis of spermine. Because arginase converts arginine to ornithine, thereby competitively depriving L-arginine from NOS production, we then determined the content of NO in the synaptoplasmic fractions and found that the content of NO is higher in the KO synaptoplasma than in the Wt synaptoplasma (Figure 1(c)). These data indicate that the reduction of arginase in KO mice may lead to an accelerated utilization of arginine for NO synthesis.

3.2. Role of mGluR1 in glutamate-dependent nitric oxide production

Because fluctuations in the NO content in the nervous tissue depend on the intensity of glutamatergic neurotransmission, we then determined the activity of NOS in the presence of various concentrations of glutamate. Our results show that glutamate increases the synthesis of NO in a concentration-dependent manner only in Wt synaptoneurosomes, whereas in the KO synaptoneurosomes, the production of nitric oxide does not change significantly (Figure 2). However, the basal activity of NOS was higher in the KO than in Wt synaptoneurosomes. These data show that, despite the increased basal activity of NOS in KO synaptoneurosomes, the production of NO is less sensitive to glutamate in IL-10-deficient mice.

It is well established that overstimulation of NMDA receptors can increase the local Ca2+ concentration, which activates neuronal nitric-oxide synthase (nNOS) [31] . Moreover, accumulating evidence suggests that group I metabotropic glutamate receptors trigger Ca2+ release from intracellular calcium stores by inositol triphosphate (IP3) [17] and may increase the activity of NOS [32] . Therefore, the impairments observed in the glutamate-dependent NOS activity may be due to a lower expression of NMDA-type or metabotropic glutamate receptors in KO mice. Thus, we then determined the contents of the NMDAR2A and NMDAR2B subunits of NMDAR, mGluR type1a/b, and nNOS in Wt and KO synaptoneurosomes. The level of nNOS, as well as the levels of the NMDAR subunits (NR2A and NR2B), were not changed significantly in the KO mice compared with the Wt mice. However, the level of mGluR1a/b was markedly decreased in the plasma membrane of the synaptoneurosomes from KO mice (Figure 3).

To confirm the hypothesis that the activity of mGluR type1a/b may alter the glutamate-dependent NO synthesis in synaptoneurosomes, we determined the content of NO in the presence of an antagonist of mGluR1a/b, i.e., LY367385. The data show that the addition of LY367385 to the synaptoneurosomes abrogates the stimulatory effect of glutamate on NO synthesis only in the Wt synaptoneurosomes, whereas in the KO synaptoneurosomes, this antagonist does not significantly change the production of NO (Figure 4). These data confirm the

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 1. Changes in the activity of arginase II and the contents of spermine and NO in KO and Wt mice. (a) The arginase II activity was analyzed in the mitochondrial fractions obtained from the synaptoneurosomes of Wt and KO mice brains as described in Materials and Methods; (b) The synaptoplasmic fractions from KO and Wt mice were subjected to HPLC analysis to determine the spermine level and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods; (c) The content of NO in the KO and Wt synaptoneurosomes were determined by the Griess reaction as described in Materials and Methods. The values are expressed as the means ± S.E.M. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with the corresponding Wt fraction, as determined through t tests.

Figure 2. Glutamate-dependent production of nitric oxide in KO and Wt synaptoneurosomes. The NOS activity in the neurosynaptosomes derived from KO and Wt mice brains was determined. The incubation was performed with various concentrations of glutamate for 30 min at 37˚C, and the production of nitric oxide was analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The values are expressed as the means ± S.E.M.

Figure 3. Western blot analysis of nNOS, iNOS, NR2A, NR2B, and mGluR1 in synaptoneurosomes of KO and Wt mice brains. nNOS, iNOS, NR2A, NR2B, and mGluR1, were analyzed directly in the synaptoneurosomes. For the immunoblots, 50 μg of total proteins from each fraction were loaded per lane, resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose mem- branes, and probed with anti-nNOS, anti-iNOS, anti-NR2A, anti-NR2B, and anti-mGluR1a/b. β-Actin was also visualized by Western blotting to confirm equal loading of the fractions. The blot is representative of four similar experiments.

hypothesis that the glutamate-dependent synthesis of NO in the Wt synaptoneurosomes may be increased by the activation of mGluR and that the production of NO is impaired by a deficiency in mGluR1a/b.

3.3. Spermine and sodium nitroprusside enhancement of [3H] MK-801 binding

There is some evidence that IL-10 blocks the inhibitory effect of IL-1β on glutamate release and long-term potentiation (LTP) [33] . Because NMDAR is involved in LTP and taking into account that the level of NMDAR in KO mice is not changed, we then analyzed the modulatory sites of NMDAR. Among the many sites of NMDAR that may be modulated by the action of IL-10, there are sites that are sensitive to both polyamines and NO [34] . Thus, we examined the effects of spermine on the binding of MK-801 to the plasma membranes isolated from the brain of KO and Wt mice. The profiles associated with the spermine-induced enhancement of [3H] MK-801 binding were analyzed, and the two main components of the curves (an enhancement phase and an inhibitory phase at higher concentrations) were found in both types of mice. The curve analysis showed that the brain plasma membrane from Wt mice present a significantly higher mean maximal enhancement than the plasma membrane from KO, and no other differences were statistically significant (Figure 5). These data suggest that the NMDAR in KO mice has lost its sensitivity to spermine.

Both the NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDAR undergo S-nitrosylation on cysteine thiol groups by endogenous NO and exogenously applied S-nitrosothiols [35] . Therefore, we then attempted to evaluate the effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), which is often used as a NO donor, on [3H] MK-801 binding to NMDAR in synaptoneurosomes and found that the IC50 values of Wt and KO synaptoneurosomes for SNP do not differ significantly. The IC50 for SNP of the Wt synaptoneurosomes was 283.6 ± 20.9 μM, whereas that of KO synaptoneurosomes was 254.9 ± 32.3 μM. These data suggest that the IL-10 gene knockout does not change the ability of NO to modulate NMDAR in mice.

Figure 4. Antagonist of mGluR1-LY367385 blocks glutamate-dependent production of nitric oxide in KO synapto-neuro- somes. The synaptoneurosomes derived from KO and Wt mice brains were incubated for 30 min at 37˚C with and without 100 μM glutamate and 10 μM LY367385. The activity of NOS was determined as described in Materials and Methods. The values are expressed as the means ± S.E.M. *P < 0.05 compared with the corresponding control, as determined through t tests.

Figure 5. Effects of spermine on the specific [3H] MK-801 binding in plasma membranes derived from KO and Wt synap- toneurosomes. The assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. The plasma membranes derived from KO and Wt synaptoneurosomes were incubated with 2 nM [3H] MK-801 and a range of concentrations of spermine (1 - 10,000 nM) for 45 min at room temperature as described in Materials and Methods. Non-specific binding was defined by unlabelled (500 nM) MK-801. The enhancement of specific [3H] MK-801 binding with each spermine concentration was calculated as fmol bound per mg of protein. The values are expressed as the means ± S.E.M.

4. Discussion

The cytokine IL-10 has been shown to improve neurologic outcome after central nervous system injury and render neurons less vulnerable to detrimental effects [1] [2] [36] - [38] . IL-10 acts as a growth factor [39] , regulates neurogenesis in the normal adult brain, promotes axonal outgrowth, stimulates neuroregeneration [4] , and provides trophic and survival effects against glutamate-dependent excitotoxicity [5] . IL-10 can change long-term potentiation, which suggests that a target of the cytokine is the system participating in glutamatergic neurotransmission [33] .

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important signaling molecule that is widely used in the nervous system. Accumulating evidence suggests that nitrergic signaling modulates neuronal homeostasis and intrinsic excitability under physiological conditions [40] . Metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors are considered to regulate NO production via Ca2+-induced nNOS activation [41] [42] . Our data indicate that the synaptoneurosomes of IL-10-de- ficient mice present lower glutamate-dependent NOS activity compared with the control synaptoneurosomes. Moreover, we find that the glutamate-dependent acceleration of NO-synthesis is inhibited by an antagonist of mGluR1, namely LY367385, only in the Wt synaptoneurosomes, whereas this sensitivity of NOS is completely lost in the KO mice. Furthermore, our experiments show that the expression of mGluR1 is significantly decreased in KO mice, whereas the expression of the NMDAR subunits NR2A and NR2B is unchanged. These data suggest that the NOS activity in the Wt synaptoneurosomes depends on the mGluR receptor to a certain extent and that the reduced expression of mGluR in IL-10-deficient mice leads to the diminution of glutamate-de- pendent NO synthesis.

In this study, we have analyzed the effect of spermine on [3H] MK-801 binding to NMDA receptor. Polyamines are complex allosteric modulators of the NMDA receptor [43] . At low concentration polyamines (3 - 100 M) enhanced the binding of [3H] MK-801, whereas at high concentrations of spermine (>100 μM), [3H] MK-801 binding was inhibited [44] , suggesting that polyamines modulate the NMDA receptor by at least two distinct actions. We have found that NMDA receptor from KO mice cortex exhibited lower affinity to spermine compared with NMDA receptor from Wt mice in [3H] MK-801 saturation analysis. Because only NR1A/NR2B subtype of NMDA receptor contain a binding site for the both, stimulatory and inhibitory components of polyamine actions [45] , our data suggest that the cortex of IL-10 deficient mice comprising a splicing isoforms of NMDA receptor with low affinity to spermine. e.g. NR1A subunit with deleted region in N-terminal domain cassette [34] .

The present data also indicate that a deficiency of IL-10 reduces the expression of the mitochondrial arginase II isoform, whereas the induction of the arginase I isoform is not changed. There is some evidence suggesting that the induction of arginase I and II genes is regulated differentially by IL-10. Arginase II has been shown to be induced directly by IL-10, whereas this cytokine increases arginase I expression only when synergized with IL-4 [6] . Both IL-10 and IL-4 operate through the STAT3 and STAT6 transcription factors [46] [47] , the expression of which is coordinately regulated by various transcription elements, such as CCAAT/enhancer binding protein b (C/EBP) [48] [49] . CCAAT/enhancer binding protein b is a member of the C/EBP family of transcription factors, which is regulated at multiple levels during several physiological and pathophysiological conditions through the action of various hormones and cytokines [50] . C/EBP promotes the transcription of a wide range of genes, including the mGluR1 gene [51] [52] . In addition, gene C/EBP is itself specifically upregulated by IL-10 [6] . Thus, a deficiency in IL-10 may downregulated the expression of C/EBP-protein and C/EBP-related genes, including STAT3, and thereby the mGluR1 genes [51] [52] . Our observation that a deficiency in IL-10 causes the downregulation of mGluR1a/b expression in mice confirms the hypothesis that IL-10 may act through C/EBP. Taking into account that the activity of arginase II and the content of mGluR are decreased in the KO mice, it is possible to conclude that IL-10 deficiency primarily affects genes that are activated by CCAAT/en- hancer binding protein. However, additional experiments are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Taken together, these results suggest that the knockout of the IL-10 gene in mice decreases the expression of mGluR1 and the expression of arginase II. These perturbations initiate a cascade of biochemical events that leads to the reduction in polyamine synthesis and to the downregulation of mGluR-dependent NO-production. The reduced level of polyamines decreases the NMDA-receptor responses to spermine, whereas the downregulation of mGluR reduces the modulatory effects of NO. Taking into account the facts that mGluR is involved in synaptogenesis, neuronal differentiation, synaptic transmission, and plasticity [53] and that polyamines are important for the development and regeneration of neurons [8] , these results indicate that IL-10 may have a positive effect on the regenerative and cognitive functions of the brain. These studies are consistent with the hypothesis that IL-10, in addition to having an immunomodulatory action in immune cells, provides neuroprotection that may have direct beneficial effects on the neurological outcome after central nervous system injury.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. M.Gongadze for providing the C57BL/6J mice. This work was supported, in part, by N5048 research grant from the Science and Technology Center in Ukraine (STCU) and Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation (SRNSF). Partial support for these studies was provided by a grant-in-aid from the Ilia State University.

NOTES

*Corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Grilli, M., Barbieri, I., Basudev, H., Brusa, R., Casati, C., Lozza, G. and Ongini, E. (2000) Interleukin-10 Modulates Neuronal Threshold of Vulnerability to Ischaemic Damage. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 2265-2272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00090.x
[2] Boyd, Z.S., Kriatchko, A., Yang, J., Agarwal, N., Wax, M.B. and Patil, R.V. (2003) Interleukin-10 Receptor Signaling through STAT-3 Regulates the Apoptosis of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Response to Stress. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 44, 5206-5211.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0534
[3] Zhou, Z., Peng, X., Insolera, R., Fink, D.J. and Mata, M. (2009) IL-10 Promotes Neuronal Survival Following Spinal Cord Injury. Experimental Neurology, 220, 183-190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.08.018
[4] Vidal, P.M., Lemmens, E., Dooley, D. and Hendrix, S. (2013) The Role of “Anti-Inflammatory” Cytokines in Axon Regeneration. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 24, 1-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2012.08.008
[5] Zhou, Z., Peng, X., Insolera, R., Fink, D.J. and Mata, M. (2009) Interleukin-10 Provides Direct Trophic Support to Neurons. Journal of Neurochemistry, 110, 1617-1627.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06263.x
[6] Lang, R., Patel, D., Morris, J.J., Rutschman, R.L. and Murray, P.J. (2002) Shaping Gene Expression in Activated and Resting Primary Macrophages by IL-10. The Journal of Immunology, 169, 2253-2263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.5.2253
[7] Munder, M., Eichmann, K., Morán, J.M., Centeno, F., Soler, G. and Modolell, M. (1999) Th1/Th2-Regulated Expression of Arginase Isoforms in Murine Macrophages and Dendritic Cells. The Journal of Immunology, 163, 3771-3777.
[8] Chu, P.J., Saito, H. and Abe, K. (1995) Polyamines Promote Regeneration of Injured Axons of Cultured Rat Hippocampal Neurons. Brain Research, 673, 233-241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)01419-I
[9] Williams, K. (1997) Interactions of Polyamines with Ion Channels. Biochemical Journal, 325, 289-297.
[10] Pellegrini-Giampietro, D.E. (2003) An Activity-Dependent Spermine-Mediated Mechanism That Modulates Glutamate Transmission. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 9-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)00004-8
[11] Liu, P., Gupta, N., Jing, Y. and Zhang, H. (2008) Age-Related Changes in Polyamines in Memory-Associated Brain Structures in Rats. Neuroscience, 155, 789-796.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.033
[12] Mori, M. and Gotoh, T. (2000) Regulation of Nitric Oxide Production by Arginine Metabolic Enzymes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 275, 715-719.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2000.3169
[13] Estévez, A.G., Sahawneh, M.A., Lange, P.S., Bae, N., Egea, M. and Ratan, R.R. (2006) Arginase 1 Regulation of Nitric Oxide Production Is Key to Survival of Trophic Factor-Deprived Motor Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8512-8516.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0728-06.2006
[14] Wiesinger, H. (2001) Arginine Metabolism and the Synthesis of Nitric Oxide in the Nervous System. Progress in Neurobiology, 64, 365-391.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00056-3
[15] Lange, P.S., Langley, B., Lu, P. and Ratan, R.R. (2004) Novel Roles for Arginase in Cell Survival, Regeneration, and Translation in the Central Nervous System. Journal of Nutrition, 134, 2812S-2817S.
[16] Aarts, M., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Besshoh, S., Arundine, M., Gurd, J.W., Wang, Y.T., Salter, M.W. and Tymianski, M. (2002) Treatment of Ischemic Brain Damage by Perturbing NMDA Receptor-PSD-95 Protein Interactions. Science, 298, 846-850.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1072873
[17] Wang, H. and Zhuo, M. (2012) Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Gene Transcription and Implications for Synaptic Plasticity and Diseases. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 3, 189.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00189
[18] Maiese, K., Vincent, A., Lin, S.H. and Shaw, T. (2000) Group I and Group III Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtypes Provide Enhanced Neuroprotection. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 62, 257-272.
[19] Maiese, K., Chong, Z.Z. and Li, F. (2005) Driving Cellular Plasticity and Survival through the Signal Transduction Pathways of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors. Current Neurovascular Research, 2, 425-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156720205774962692
[20] Chen, T., Cao, L., Dong, W., Luo, P., Liu, W., Qu, Y. and Fei, Z. (2012) Protective Effects of mGluR5 Positive Modulators against Traumatic Neuronal Injury through PKC-Dependent Activation of MEK/ERK Pathway. Neurochemical Research, 37, 983-990.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11064-011-0691-z
[21] Byrnes, K.R., Loane, D.J. and Faden, A.I. (2009) Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors as Targets for Multipotential Treatment of Neurological Disorders. Neurotherapeutics, 6, 94-107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2008.10.038
[22] Hollingsworth, E.B., McNeal, E.T., Burton, J.L., Williams, R.J., Daly, J.W. and Creveling, C.R. (1985) Biochemical Characterization of a Filtered Synaptoneurosome Preparation from Guinea Pig Cerebral Cortex: Cyclic Adenosine 3’: 5’-Monophosphate-Generating Systems, Receptors, and Enzymes. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 2240-2253.
[23] Weiler, I.J., Spangler, C.C., Klintsova, A.Y., Grossman, A.W., Kim, S.H., Bertaina-Anglade, V., Khaliq, H., de Vries, F.E., Lambers, F.A., Hatia, F., Base, C.K. and Greenough, W.T. (2004) Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Is Necessary for Neurotransmitter-Activated Protein Translation at Synapses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 17504-17509.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407533101
[24] Benavides, J., Claustre, Y. and Scatton, B. (1988) L-Glutamate Increases Internal Free Calcium Levels in Synaptoneurosomes from Immature Rat Brain via Quisqualate Receptors. Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 3607-3615.
[25] Muddashetty, R.S., Kelic, S., Gross, C., Xu, M. and Bassell, G.J. (2007) Dysregulated Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Dependent Translation of AMPA Receptor and Postsynaptic Density-95 mRNAs at Synapses in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5338-5348.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0937-07.2007
[26] Kim, S.H., Fraser, P.E., Westaway, D., St. George-Hyslop, P.H., Ehrlich, M.E. and Gandy, S. (2010) Group II Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Stimulation Triggers Production and Release of Alzheimer’s Amyloid β42 from Isolated Intact Nerve Terminals. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 3870-3875.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4717-09.2010
[27] Mesquita, A.R., Correia-Neves, M., Castroa, A.G.R., Vieira, P., Pedrosaa, J., Palhaa, J.A. and Sousaa, N. (2008) IL-10 Modulates Depressive-Like Behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 89-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.02.004
[28] Xin, J., Wainwright, D.A., Mesnard, N.A., Serpe, C.J., Sanders, V.M. and Jones, K.J. (2011) IL-10 within the CNS Is Necessary for CD4+ T Cells to Mediate Neuroprotection. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 25, 820-829.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2010.08.004
[29] Sethi, R., Chava, R.S., Bashir, S. and Castro, E.M. (2011) An Improved High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for Identification and Quantization of Polyamines as Benzoylated Derivatives. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2, 456-469.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2011.24055
[30] Yu, H., Iyer, R.K., Kern, R.M., Rodriguez, W.I., Grody, W.W. and Cederbaum, S.D. (2001) Expression of Arginase Isozymes in Mouse Brain. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 66, 406-422.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.1233
[31] Rameau, G.A., Chiu, L.Y. and Ziff, E.B. (2003) NMDA Receptor Regulation of nNOS Phosphorylation and Induction of Neuron Death. Neurobiology of Aging, 24, 1123-1133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.07.002
[32] Nicoletti, F., Bockaert, J., Collingridge, G.L., Conn, P.J., Ferraguti, F., Schoepp, D.D., Wroblewski, J.T. and Pin, J.P. (2011) Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors: From the Workbench to the Bedside. Neuropharmacology, 60, 1017-1041.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.10.022
[33] Kelly, A., Lynch, A., Vereker, E., Nolan, Y., Queenan, P., Whittaker, E., O’Neill, L.A. and Lynch, M.A. (2001) The Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine, Interleukin (IL)-10, Blocks the Inhibitory Effect of IL-1β on Long Term Potentiation. A Role for JNK. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276, 45564-45572.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M108757200
[34] Traynelis, S.F., Hartley, M. and Heinemann, S.F. (1995) Control of Proton Sensitivity of the NMDA Receptor by RNA Splicing and Polyamines. Science, 268, 873-876.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7754371
[35] Choi, Y.B., Tenneti, L., Le, D.A., Ortiz, J., Bai, G., Chen, H.S. and Lipton, S.A. (2000) Molecular Basis of NMDA Receptor-Coupled Ion Channel Modulation by S-Nitrosylation. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 15-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/71090
[36] Knoblach, S.M. and Faden, A.I. (1998) Interleukin-10 Improves Outcome and Alters Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury. Experimental Neurology, 153, 143-151.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/exnr.1998.6877
[37] Sharma, S., Yang, B., Xi, X., Grotta, J.C., Aronowski, J. and Savitz, S.I. (2011) IL-10 Directly Protects Cortical Neurons by Activating PI-3 Kinase and STAT-3 Pathways. Brain Research, 1373, 189-194.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2012.2651
[38] Thompson, C.D., Zurko, J.C., Hanna, B.F., Hellenbrand, D.J. and Hanna, A. (2013) The Therapeutic Role of Interleukin-10 after Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 30, 1311-1324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2012.2651
[39] Perez-Asensio, F.J., Perpiná, U., Planas, A.M. and Pozas, E. (2013) Interleukin-10 Regulates Progenitor Differentiation and Modulates Neurogenesis in Adult Brain. Journal of Cell Science, 126, 4208-4219.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.127803
[40] Steinert, J.R., Chernova, T. and Forsythe, I.D. (2010) Nitric Oxide Signaling in Brain Function, Dysfunction, and Dementia. The Neuroscientist, 16, 435-452.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073858410366481
[41] Bhardwaj, A., Northington, F.J., Martin, L.J., Hanley, D.F., Traystma, R.J. and Koehler, R.C. (1997) Characterization of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Nitric Oxide Production in Vivo. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 17, 153-160.
[42] Llansola, M. and Felipo, V. (2010) Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5, but Not 1, Modulates NMDA Receptor-Mediated Activation of Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase. Neurochemistry International, 56, 535-554.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2009.12.016
[43] Traynelis, S.F., Wollmuth, L.P., McBain, C.J., Menniti, F.S., Vance, K.M., Ogden, K.K., Hansen, K.B., Yuan, H., Myers, S.J. and Dingledine, R. (2010) Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels: Structure, Regulation, and Function. Pharmacological Reviews, 62, 405-496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.109.002451
[44] Reynolds, I.J. and Miller, R.J. (1989) Ifenprodil Is a Novel Type of NMDA Receptor Antagonist: Interaction with Polyamines. Molecular Pharmacology, 36, 758-765.
[45] Sharma, T.A. and Reynolds, I.J. (1999) Characterization of the Effects of Polyamines on [125I]MK-801 Binding to Recombinant N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 289, 1041-1047.
[46] O’Shea, J.J., Pesu, M., Borie, D.C. and Changelian, P.S. (2004) A New Modality for Immunosuppression: Targeting the JAK/STAT Pathway. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 3, 555-564.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd1441
[47] Sica, A. and Bronte, V. (2007) Altered Macrophage Differentiation and Immune Dysfunction in Tumor Development. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 117, 1155-1166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI31422
[48] Gotoh, T., Chowdhury, S., Takiguchi, M. and Mori, M. (1997) The Glucocorticoid-Responsive Gene Cascade. Activation of the Rat Arginase Gene through Induction of C/EBPβ. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, 3694-3698.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.6.3694
[49] Oliva Jr., A.A., Kang, Y., Sanchez-Molano, J., Furones, C. and Atkins, C.M. (2012) STAT3 Signaling after Brain Injury. Journal of Neurochemistry, 120, 710-720.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07610.x
[50] Ramji, D.P. and Foka, P. (2002) CCAAT/Enhancer-Binding Proteins: Structure, Function and Regulation. Biochemical Journal, 365, 561-575.
[51] Crepaldi, L., Lackner, C., Corti, C. and Ferraguti, F. (2007) Transcriptional Activators and Repressors for the Neuron-specific Expression of a Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 17877-17889.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M700149200
[52] Kfoury, N. and Kapatos, G. (2009) Identification of Neuronal Target Genes for CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Proteins. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, 40, 313-327.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2008.11.004
[53] Ferraguti, F., Crepaldi, L. and Nicoletti, F. (2008) Metabotropic Glutamate 1 Receptor: Current Concepts and Perspectives. Pharmacological Reviews, 60, 536-581.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.108.000166

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.