Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Vitamin D and Calcium Intake in Healthy Female College Students ()
1. Introduction
Vitamin D deficiency and related diseases such as osteoporosis and type 2 Diabetes are common problems in countries where the sun is limited [1] but is also seen in Arabic countries [2] [3] where cultural or religious reasons play important role even though they may enjoy abundant of sunshine all twelve months of a year. Dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D may play significant role in the development of diabetes type 2 and osteoporosis and early assessment and prevention of a possible deficiency of these nutrients may seem beneficial later on their life [4] [5] .
Nutrient intakes can be estimated by using standard methods such as food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and food records (FR). FFQ are administrate in a clinical setting by a registered dietitian and it is usually used to asses relation of dietary intake to a development of a disease [6] , while FR assess dietary intake of a short time of period usually three days which will include two weekdays and one weekend day [7] .
The FFQ should be validated under a specific population taking in consideration country, age, list of food items that all will capture the study population’s eating behaviors and customs [7] [8] . The FFQ has been also validated based on socioeconomic class, adolescents and also in college students [8] -[10] . A pilot validation study of FFQ has been also reported by Pritchard and his collogues [11] in order to assess calcium, vitamin D and vitamin K in obese subjects.
Until now, there are no studies in Arabic countries that they have validated a FFQ for the assessment of vitamin D and calcium intake in adolescents. The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility and validity of a FFQ and to assess calcium and vitamin D intake in healthy female adolescents from a university of Abu Dhabi.
2. Methodology
Forty-five female students were conveniently recruited from January 2014 to March 2014. Ten of them were taking medication or supplements and excluded from the study. The rest 35 subjects (self reported) were free of any known diseases such as diabetes 1 and 2, hyperlipidemia, renal and liver problems, etc. The subjects completed a FFQ and a FR by a registered dietitian two different periods that were one month apart. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Zayed University of Abu Dhabi and a written consent form was signed by all subjects.
Subjects were self-reported on age, weight and height. Body mass index was calculated based on the following formula, BMI: weight (kg)/height (m)2.
Vitamin D and Calcium was assessed using a FFQ and a FR (3 days-two weekdays and one weekend). The FFQ used was a modified version of a previous validated questionnaire [9] , adapted to Arabic eating and culture habits by including specific foods eaten in these areas. The FFQ and FD administered twice by the same person with one-month interval period. An average daily intake of vitamin D and calcium was calculated for the FFQ, while in the FQ the subjects were asked to describe portions sizes and preparation methods for the similar food items were in FFQ.
3. Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS for Mac (version 21) package. Descriptive statistics measures and box-plots are provided. Testing of the Normality assumption for the two continuous variables was performed by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov non-parametric test. The comparison of continuous variables’ means of the Ca and vitamin D for the two questionnaires was performed by using a paired samples t-test. For all tests, a significance level of 5% was used.
4. Results
The mean age of the subjects were 20 - 22 years old with a mean weight (kg) of 65 ± 5.8 and a mean height (cm) of 162 ± 6.3.
Table 1 represents the mean values ± SD of calcium and vitamin D intake using the FFQ and FR over one month period apart. Calcium Intake was found statistically significantly lower (p < 00.5) in FR compared with FFQ in the base period. Correlation between FFQ and FR is also indicated. Strong and moderate positive correlations were observed of daily vitamin D (r = 0.82, p < 0.001) and calcium intake (r = 0.74, p < 0.001), respectively, derived from FFQ compared with the FR. Similar results were found also after the one-month period.
Figure 1 and Figure 2 plots the differences in both time periods between the FFQ and FR for calcium and vitamin D, respectively.
The mean differences between FFQ and FR for calcium and vitamin D in baseline and after one month are presented in Table 2. The FFQ overestimated calcium by 43 mg/d (95% CI: 20, 65, p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Box plots showing the differences of calcium intake between FFQ and FR (3 days) in baseline and after one month. Abbreviations: FFQ: food frequency questionnaire; 3 day: food record; Ca: calcium.
Figure 2. Box plots showing the differences of vitamin D intake between FFQ and FR (3 days) in baseline and after one month. Abbreviations: FFQ: food frequency questionnaire; 3 day: food record; Ca: calcium.
5. Discussion
It is well known that in order to assess intakes of key nutrients such as calcium and vitamin D for bone health as well for diabetes type 2, a valid tool is required [12] .
The Calcium intake derived from the FFQ was significantly higher compared with the FR. The difference
Table 1. Dietary intakes of calcium and vitamin D.
*Statistically significantly difference p < 0.05, **p < 0.001. 1t-test, 2Pearson correlation test, Abbreviations: FFQ: food frequency questionnaire; FR: food record; Ca: calcium intake; vitD: vitamin D intake.
Table 2. Mean differences of Calcium and vitamin D for FFQ and FR in baseline and after one month.
*Statistically significantly difference, p < 0.05. Abbreviations: CI: confidence intervals; FFQ: food frequency questionnaire; FR: 3 days food record; Ca: calcium.
however is so small that clinically would have no significant effect to the patients. The results could be possibly be affected by the small number of subjects. However the reproducibility of the two methods was similar after the result of one month indicating that both methods can be accurately measure calcium intake. Similar results have been found in a recent study [13] .
Other dietary assessment tools have been reported in the literature with their own weaknesses and strengths. FR has been found to overestimated vitamin D intake [14] while the 24-hour recall is more often preferred because it is less demanding on a study subject; however it relies basically on the memory of the person [6] . In our study we demonstrated that the vitamin D intake reported with negligible differences in both FFQ and FR methods. In addition to that the validity of the method was also high after the results of one month. This is very important since it is the first time we validate a FFQ and a FR in a specific population in an Arabic city. Similar data for other population have been identified in the literature such as in Italy [15] , Brazil [16] and Malaysia [17] .
Our study indicated that 67% of participants were classified into the same quartile of intake of calcium and vitamin D (data not shown). These finding are in accordance with other studies [11] .
Our study has its strength that is the inclusion of local foods of Abu Dhabi and also that nature of data that was interviewer administrated.
However, the study also has its limitations. First, it is the small sample sizes, which limit the conclusions, and second the general results to the female adult population. Nevertheless, this the first time to publish data of a validation tool in an Arabica city and it can be used as a pilot study for the future since vitamin D deficiency and type 2 diabetes are very common in United Arab of Emirates.
6. Conclusion
The FFQ used in this study shows promising validation evidence to be used in the future for assessing vitamin D and calcium intakes in female students. Additional studies with larger samples are needed to validate this FFQ so it can be used as a dietary screening tool for prevention of osteoporosis and diabetes type 2 later on.