Autonomy-Supportive Leadership Behavior Contents

doi:10.4236/jss.2014.26050

Home > Journals > Business & Economics | Social Sciences & Humanities > JSS

JSS> Vol.2 No.6, June 2014

Share This Article:

Open Access

Autonomy-Supportive Leadership Behavior Contents

Full-Text HTML

Download as PDF (Size:700KB) PP. 433-440

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2014.26050 3,729 Downloads 4,978 Views Citations

Author(s) Leave a comment

Zakaria Hocine, Jian Zhang, Yahui Song, Lan Ye

Affiliation(s)

Dongling School of Economics & Management, University of Science and Technology, Beijing, China.

ABSTRACT

Previous research on leader support was mainly based on the theory of social exchange, whereas few empirical studies have been derived from another motivational frame work. This study based on self-determination theory (SDT: Deci & Ryan) investigated leaders’ autonomy-supportive behavior within the organizational context. Leader’s autonomy support means from employees’ perspectives, providing greater choice, and encouraging self-initiation. Results from a sample of 65 managers working in Chinese enterprises showed four specific leader behaviors, including trust and respect of employees, instructing of employees’ career planning, counseling and recognizing, as well as positive monitoring and feedback that may give rise to employees’ perceived autonomy support. Discussion focused on the importance of leader’s autonomy-supportive behavior and pointed out some prospects for the future research.

KEYWORDS

Leadership, Autonomy Support, Perceived Autonomy Support, Self-Determination Theory

Cite this paper

Hocine, Z. , Zhang, J. , Song, Y. and Ye, L. (2014) Autonomy-Supportive Leadership Behavior Contents. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 433-440. doi: 10.4236/jss.2014.26050.

References

[1]	Gagne, M. and Deci, E.L. (2005) Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.322

[2]	Deci, E.L., Spiegel, N.H., Ryan, R.M., et al. (1982) Effects of Performance Standards on Teaching Styles: Behavior of Controlling Teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 852-859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.852

[3]	Deci, E.L., Connell, J.P. and Ryan, R.M. (1989) Self-Determination in a Work Organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580

[4]	Amabile, T.M. (1997) Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do. California Management Review, 40, 39-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165921

[5]	Amabile, T.M., Schatzel, E.A., Moneta, G.B. and Kramer, S.J. (2004) Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003

[6]	Yukl, G.A. (2002) Leadership in Organizations. 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

[7]	Gange, M. and Bhave, D. (In Press) Autonomy in the Workplace: An Essential Ingredient to Employee Engagement and Well-Being in Every Culture. In: Chirkov, R. and Sheldon, Eds., Personal Autonomy in Cross-Cultural Context: Perspective on the Psychology of Freedom and People’s Well-Being, Springer.