Health> Vol.6 No.3, February 2014

Physical activity and nutrition intervention for mothers of young children: Process evaluation

DownloadDownload as PDF (Size:116KB)  HTML    PP. 223-230  

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Process evaluation of community based projects is integral to understanding the success or failure of health promotion interventions. Process evaluation was used to assess the intervention strategies and resources in a playgroup setting aimed at mothers of young children. Methods: Process evaluation data were collected from participants (n = 249) and staff (n = 25) involved in the intervention. Data included staff perspectives on use of the playgroup as a setting, participants’ views on the feasibility and acceptability of the program strategies and resources, and program reach. Results: Responding participants reported that the intervention was useful (98%) and relevant for their age group (92%), encouraged them to think about making changes to their physical activity (95%) and dietary (98%) behaviors, and helped them to make changes to their physical activity (66%) and dietary (79%) behaviors. Participants reported that the most useful intervention strategies included the program booklet (85%), workshops (86%), newsletters (73%) and SMS (57%). Conclusion: This research provides valuable information on participants’ perspectives of the program strategies, content and overall implementation. It provides insight into the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and identifies areas for improvement when conducting programs in playgroup settings. The process evaluation indicated that playgroups are a suitable setting for health promotion targeting mothers of young children.

Cite this paper

Monteiro, S. , Jancey, J. and Howat, P. (2014) Physical activity and nutrition intervention for mothers of young children: Process evaluation. Health, 6, 223-230. doi: 10.4236/health.2014.63033.

References

[1] World Health Organisation (2009) Global health risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. World Health Organisation, Geneva.
[2] World Health Organisation (2005) Preventing chronic disease a vital investment: WHO Global Report, Geneva.
[3] Davis, E.M., Stange, K.C. and Horwitz, R.I. (2012) Childbearing, stress and obesity disparities in women: A public health perspective. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16, 109-118.
[4] Thangaratinam, S. and Jolly, K. (2010) Obesity in pregnancy: A review of reviews on the effectiveness of interventions. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 117, 1309-1312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02670.x
[5] Tsoi, E., Shaikh, H., Robinson, S. and Teoh, T.G. (2010) Obesity in pregnancy: A major healthcare issue. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 86, 617-623.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2010.098186
[6] Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) National health survey: Users’ guide—Electronic publication, 2007-08. Canberra.
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4363.0.55.0012007-08
[7] Brown, W.J., Heesch, K.C. and Miller, Y.D. (2009) Life events and changing physical activity patterns in women at different life stages. Annals Behavioral Medicine, 37, 294-305.
[8] Amorim, A.R., Linne, Y.M. and Lourenco, P.M.C. (2007) Diet, exercise, or both, for weight reduction in women after childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, Article ID: CD005627.
[9] Kuhlmann, A.K.S., Dietz, P.M., Galavotti, C. and England, L.J. (2008) Weight-management interventions for pregnant or post-partum women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 523-528.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.010
[10] Hartman, M.A., Hosper, K. and Stronks, K. (2010) Targeting physical activity and nutrition interventions towards mothers with young children: A review on components that contribute to attendance and effectiveness. Public Health Nutrition, Cambridge, 1-18.
[11] Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D., Schulz, K. and Ravaud, P. (2008) Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 295-309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008
[12] Armstrong, R., Waters, E., Moore, L., Riggs, E., Cuervo, L.G., Lumbiganon, P., et al. (2008) Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: Advancing Trend and consort. Journal of Public Health, 30, 103-109.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdm082
[13] O’Connor-Fleming, M.L., Parker, E., Higgins, H. and Gould, T. (2006) A framework for evaluating health promotion programs. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 17, 61-66.
[14] Nutbeam, D. and Bauman, A. (2006) Evaluation in a nutshell. MacGraw-Hill, Sydney.
[15] Hubley, J. (2004) Communicating health: An action guide to health education and health promotion. MacMillan, London.
[16] Jancey, J., Clarke, A., Howat, P., Lee, A. and Shilton, T. (2008) A physical activity program to mobilize older people: A practical and sustainable approach. The Gerontologist, 48, 251-257.
[17] Hawe, P., Degeling, D. and Hall, J. (1990) Evaluating health promotion: A health workers guide. MacLennan and Petty, Sydney.
[18] Rootman, I., Goodstadt, M., Potvin, L. and Springett, J. (2001) A framework for health promotion evaluation. WHO Regional Publications European Services, 92, 7-32.
[19] Munro, A., and Bloor, M. (2010) Process evaluation: The new miracle ingredient in public health research? Qualitative Research, 10, 699-713.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794110380522
[20] Monteiro, S.M., Jancey, J., Howat, P., Burns, S., Jones, C., Dhaliwal, S.S., et al. (2011) The protocol of a randomized controlled trial for playgroup mothers: Reminder on Food, Relaxation, Exercise, and Support for Health (REFRESH) Program. BMC Public Health, 11, 648.
[21] Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K. and Lewis, F.M. (2008) Health behaviour and health education: Theory, research and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[22] Green, L. and Kreuter, M. (2005) Health program planning: An educational and ecological approach. 4th Edition, McGraw Hill, New York.
[23] Bandura, A. (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
[24] Resnicow, K., DiIorio, C., Soet, J., Borrelli, B., Ernst, D., Hecht, J., et al. (2002) Motivational interviewing in medical and public health settings. Guilford Press, New York, 251-269.
[25] Department of Health and Ageing (2005) Food for health: Dietary guidelines for Australians, a guide to healthy eating. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra.
[26] US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) (2008) Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.
[27] Egger, G., Donovon, R., Swinburn, B., Giles-Corti, B. and Bull, F.C. (1999) Physical activity guidelines for Australians: Scientific background report. A report by the University of Western Australia and The Centre for Health Promotion and Research Sydney for the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care.
[28] Olvera, N., Knox, B., Scherer, R., Maldonado, G., Sharma, S., Alastuey, L., et al. (2008) A healthy lifestyle program for Latino daughters and mothers: The BOUNCE overview and process evaluation. American Journal of Health Education, 39, 283.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2008.10599052
[29] Burke, L., Jancey, J., Howat, P., Lee, A. and Kerr, D. (2012) Physical activity and nutrition for seniors (PANS): Process evaluation. Health Promotion Practice, 14, 543-551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1524839912461504
[30] Jones, C., Jancey, J, Howat, P., Burns, S. and McManus, A. (2010) Report of the mothers with young children physical activity and nutrition playgroup intervention. Healthway Report, Perth.
[31] Marcus, B.H. and Forsyth, L.H. (1998) Tailoring interventions to promote physically active lifestyles in women. Women’s Health Issues: Official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, 8, 104-111.
[32] Jones, C., Burns, S., Howat, P., Jancey, J., McManus, A. and Carter, O. (2010) Playgroup as a setting for nutrition and physical activity interventions for moths with young children: Exploratory qualitative findings. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 21, 92-98.
[33] Walker, R., Turnbull, D., Pratt, N. and Wilkinson, C. (2005) The development and process evaluation of an information-based intervention for pregnant women aimed at addressing rates of caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112, 1605-1614.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.