Comparative Analysis of Cartographic Literacy in the Selected Curricula at the Primary Level

Abstract

Basic knowledge of maps, because of its widespread use, has become a part of the individual’s modern literacy. This is why we were interested in how this kind of literacy is represented in schools, when it occurs and how it is upgraded. Based on the study of literature we have formed criteria of cartographic literacy and based on the comparative method we have compared curricula for the lower stage of primary education of two countries (England and Slovenia). We found that cartographic literacy is given most attention, as well as in content as in didactic recommendations, in the Slovene curriculum for Social Studies (second triad). But according to the pupils’ cognitive abilities, it is being introduced too late. In the English curriculum for Geography initial cartography is far more dependent on the teachers and their cartography knowledge (or lack of it) because of the general definition of objectives and lack of recommendations. A combination of such an open curriculum and teacher’s cartography knowledge (or lack of it) can push cartographic literacy a step back from other content. That is why educating teachers and paying attention to the matter either in the curriculum or in textbook sets is of utmost importance.

Share and Cite:

Hus, V. & Hojnik, T. (2013). Comparative Analysis of Cartographic Literacy in the Selected Curricula at the Primary Level. Creative Education, 4, 757-761. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.412107.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Acredolo, L., & Bluestein, M. (1979). Developmental changes in map reading skills. Child development, 50, 691-697.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1128934
[2] Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (1990). The development of 3 to 6year-olds’map using ability: The relative importance of landmarks and map alignment. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 151, 181-194.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1990.9914653
[3] Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2003). Young children’s ability to use coordinate references. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 5-18.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1989.9914570
[4] Blades, M., Plester, B., & Spencer, C. (2003). Children’s understanding of aerial photographs. Children’s Geographies, 1, 281-293.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14733280302197
[5] Budnar, M., Hus, V., Kerin, M., Kos, D., Mirt, G., Raztresen, M., & Umek, M. (2011). Ucni nacrt. Program osnovna Sola. Druzba (Curriculum. Primary school educational program. Social studies.). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo Republike Slovenije za Solstvo in Sport, Zavod Republike Slovenije za Solstvo.
[6] Eurydice (2008). Ravni avtonomije in odgovornosti uciteljev v evropi. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za Solstvo in Sport.
[7] Kolar, M., KostanjSek, R., Krnel, D., Pertic, M., Umek, M., & Velkavrh, A. (2011). Ucni nacrt. Program osnovna Sola. Spoznavanje okolja (Curriculum. Primary school educational program. Environmental studies.). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo Republike Slovenije za Solstvo in Sport, Zavod Republike Slovenije za Solstvo
[8] Kulhavy, R. W., & Verdi, M. P. (2002). Learning with maps and texts: An overview. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 27-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013128426099
[9] Lin, Q., Vasiliev, R., & Zeitler Hannibal, M. A. (2002). Teaching young children basic concepts of geography: A literature-based approach. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30, 81-86.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021292900592
[10] Lipovec, A., Kmetic, C., Perat, Z., Princic Rohler, A., Repovz, B., Senekovic, J., et al. (2011). Ucni nacrt. Program osnovna Sola. Matematika (Curriculum. Primary school educational program. Mathematics.). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo Republike Slovenije za Solstvo in Sport, Zavod Republike Slovenije za Solstvo.
[11] The National Curriculum for England. Geography (1999). London: Department for Education and Employment, Qualification and Curriculum Authority. www.nc.uk.net
[12] The National Curriculum for England. Mathematics (1999). London: Department for Education and Employment, Qualification and Curriculum Authority. www.nc.uk.net
[13] Umek, M. (2001a). Kartografsko opismenjevanje v osnovni Soli. Ph.D. Thesis, Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.
[14] Umek, M. (2001b). Teoreticni model kartografskega opismenjevanja v prvem triletju osnovne Sole. Ljubljana: Faculty of Education.
[15] Umek, M. (2003). A comparison of the effectiveness of drawing maps and reading maps in beginning map teaching. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12, 18-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382040308667510
[16] Verhetsel, A. (1994). The world in our hands: An experimental programme focusing on students’ ability to represent and structure spatiality. Geographic and Environmental Education, 3, 45-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.1994.9964942
[17] Weeden, P. (2002). Teaching about language of maps. In M. Smith (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary geography (pp. 118-127). London & New York: Routledge Falmer.
http://118.97.161.124/perpus-fkip/Perpustakaan/Pendidikan%20&%20Pengajaran/%5BMargaret_Smith%5D_Aspects_of_Teaching_
Secondary_Geo%28BookFi.org%29.pdf
[18] Zupancic, T. (2008). Likovni kurikul—Primerjava konceptov v luci prenove ucnega nacrta za likovno vzgojo. Revija za elementarno izobrazevanje, 1, 33-44.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.