CUS> Vol.1 No.4, December 2013

Understanding Continuity and Change in the Persian Vernacular Settlements: A Comparative Syntactic Analysis of Urban Public Spaces in a Case Study

DownloadDownload as PDF (Size:1123KB)  HTML    PP. 130-138  

ABSTRACT

Considering the organized complexity of the city problems, the study tends to understand the process of urban transformation concerning the relation between social and spatial practices in the public places. Thus, the study conducts a comparative syntactic analysis of the urban public spaces, within the past five decades, along with the social exploration in order to understand the process of continuity and change in the historic walled city of Naein, located in the central part of Iran. The interconnections of the people and the hierarchical structure of urban public spaces have led to a considerable spatial configuration in the walled city. Adopting qualitative and quantitative approaches, the study implements the combinational research methods including the descriptive-analytical, comparative simulation, and logical reasoning methods in the case study of Naein. Furthermore, the study uses direct observation, face-to-face interview, questionnaire, documentation, and desk study. Firstly, the paper tends to explore the social attributes of the urban public spaces in the walled city of Naein. Secondly, the study implements a comparative syntactic analysis of the integration, connectivity, and depth factor through a simulation using space syntax approach. In order to understand the process of continuity and change in a comparative study of the sociospatial relations, in the urban public spaces of the case study, the results of the paper provides a descriptive exploration of the urban transformation by reading the syntactic maps in relation to the social attributes of the case study.

Cite this paper

Kamalipour, H. , Arab, A. , Soltani, S. , Alavi, S. and Mirzaei, E. (2013) Understanding Continuity and Change in the Persian Vernacular Settlements: A Comparative Syntactic Analysis of Urban Public Spaces in a Case Study. Current Urban Studies, 1, 130-138. doi: 10.4236/cus.2013.14014.

References

[1] Aghajanian, A. (1995). A new direction in population policy and family planning in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 10, 3-20.
[2] Al-Sayed, K., & Turner, A. (2012). Parametric urban design with space syntax. Fall 2011 International PUARL Conference: Generative Process, Patterns, and the Urban Challenge, Portland.
[3] Alexander, C. (1964). A city is not a tree. Architectural Forum, 122, 58-61.
[4] Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.
[5] Alexander, C. (2002). The phenomenon of life: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe. Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Environmental Structure.
[6] Barthes, R. (1973). Myth today. In R. Barthes (Ed.), Mythologies. London: Collins; Paladin.
[7] Bentley, I. (1999). Urban transformations: power, people and urban design. London: Routledge.
[8] Bonine, M. E. (1979). The morphogenesis of Iranian cities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 69, 208-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01252.x
[9] Carmona, M. (2003). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Boston: Architectural Press.
[10] Carmona, M., Magalh?es, C. D., & Hammond, L. (2008). Public space: The management dimension. New York: Routledge.
[11] Carmona, M., & Tiesdell, S. (2007). Urban design reader. Boston, MA: Architectural Press.
[12] Carr, S. (1992). Public space. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Needs in public space. In M. Carmona, & S. Tiesdell (Eds.), Urban Design Reader (pp. 230-240). Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
[14] Chiaradia, A., Hillier, B., Barnes, Y., & Schwander, C. (2010). Description and discovery in socio-spatial analysis: The case of space syntax. In G. Walford, E. Tucker, & M. Viswanathan (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Measurement. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[15] Clark, B. D., & Costello, V. (1973). The Urban System and Social Patterns in Iranian Cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 59, 99-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/621714
[16] Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
[17] De Landa, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London; New York: Continuum.
[18] Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
[19] Dovey, K. (1999). Framing places: Mediating power in the built environment. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203267639
[20] Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism/Architecture/Identity /Power. New York: Routledge.
[21] Dursun, P. (2007). Space syntax in archtectural design. 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul.
[22] Eade, J., & Mele, C. (2008). Understanding the City. In J. Eade, & C. Mele (Eds.), Understanding the City: Contemporary and Future Perspectives (pp. 3-12). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[23] Fanni, Z. (2006). Cities and urbanization in Iran after the Islamic revolution. Cities, 23, 407-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.08.003
[24] Fisher, K. D. (2009). Placing social interaction: An integrative approach to analyzing past built environments. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 439-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2009.09.001
[25] Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: using public space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
[26] Gehl, J., & Gemzoe, L. (1996). Public spaces, public life. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press and the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Architecture.
[27] Griffiths, S. (2011). Temporality in Hillier and Hanson’s theory of spatial description: Some implications of historical research for space syntax. Journal of Space Syntax, 2, 73-96.
[28] Hanson, J. (1989). Order and structure in urban design: The plans for the rebuilding of London after the Great Fire of 1666. Ekistics, 56, 22-42.
[29] Hillier, B. (1985). The nature of the artificial: the contingent and the necessary in spatial form in architecture. Geoforum, 16, 163-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(85)90026-0
[30] Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[31] Hillier, B. (1999). The hidden geometry of deformed grids: Or, why space syntax works, when it looks as though it shouldn’t. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2, 169-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b260169
[32] Hillier, B. (2008). Space and spatiality: What the built environment needs from social theory. Building Research & Information, 36, 216-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210801928073
[33] Hillier, B. (2012). Studying cities to learn about minds: Some possible implications of space syntax for spatial cognition. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39, 12-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b34047t
[34] Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
[35] Hillier, B., Hanson, J., & Graham, H. (1986). Ideas are in things: An application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes environment and planning B: planning and design, 14, 363-385.
[36] Hillier, B., & Iida, S. (2005). Network and psychological effects in urban movement. Spatial Information Theory: International Conference, COSIT 2005, Ellicottsville.
[37] Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., & Penn, A. (1987). Creating life: Or, does architecture determine anything? Architecture and Behaviour, 3, 233-250.
[38] Hillier, B., & Vaughan, L. (2007). The city as one thing. Progress in Planning, 67, 205-230.
[39] Hosagrahar, J. (2010). Cultural heritage. In R. Hutchison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of urban studies (pp. 193-198). California: SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412971973.n73
[40] Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
[41] Jiang, B., & Claramunt, C. (2002). Integration of space syntax into GIS: New perspectives for urban morphology. Transactions in GIS, 6, 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00112
[42] Jiang, B., Claramunt, C., & Klarqvist, B. (2000). Integration of space syntax into GIS for modelling urban spaces. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2, 161-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0303-2434(00)85010-2
[43] Kamalipour, H., Jalaladini, S., Fakharzadeh, M. H., Motedayen, M. A., & Dorrani Arab, A. (2012). Urban public spaces and social attributes in the naein historic walled city. ICUCI 2012: International Conference Urban Change in Iran.
[44] Kamalipour, H., Memarian, G., Faizi, M., & Mousavian, S. M. F. (2013). Evaluating CPTED measures in historical urban public places: A syntactic analysis of a case study. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3, 795-805.
[45] Kamalipour, H., Memarian, G., & Mousavian, S. M. F. (2012). Exploring the myth of four in the Persian vernacular architecture. IASTE 2012: The Myth or Tradition. Oregon: University of Oregon.
[46] Karimi, K. (2012). A configurational approach to analytical urban design: “Space syntax” methodology. Urban Design International, 17, 297-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.19
[47] Kellett, P., & Napier, M. (1995). Squatter architecture? A critical examination of vernacular theory and spontaneous settlement with reference to South America and South Africa. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 6, 7-24.
[48] Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
[49] LeGates, R. T., & Stout, F. (2011). The city reader (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
[50] Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: an inquiry into a socio-spatial process. New York: Wiley.
[51] Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford Press.
[52] Modarres, A. (2006). Urbanization and the revolution: An introduction to the special issue. Cities, 23, 405-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.08.005
[53] Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
[54] Onder, D. E., & Gidi, Y. (2010). Reading urban spaces by the spacesyntax method: A proposal for the South Hali? Region. Cities, 27, 260-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.12.006
[55] Shaftoe, H. (2008). Convivial urban spaces: Creating effective public places. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
[56] Soltanzadeh, H. (1995). Naein: Shahr-e hezarehaye tarikh (Naein: The City of millennium history), (In Persian Language). Tehran: Center of Cultural Research Publication.
[57] Steadman, J. P. (1983). Architectural morphology: An introduction to the geometry of building plans. London: Pion.
[58] Tibbalds, F. (1992). Making people-friendly towns: Improving the public environment in towns and cities. Harlow: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203469521
[59] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Vol. 5, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.