Subliminal Priming of Motivation Magnitude

Fabian Steinberg, Otmar Bock, Sebastian Dern

Institute of Physiology and Anatomy, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.411115                

Abstract

Word primes have been successfully used in the past to facilitate the processing of other words (semantic priming), but also to modify mental states such as emotion, cognition and motivation (conceptual priming). This work documented that the direction of motivational drive can be successfully changed, but left open whether its magnitude can be influenced as well. To find out, we asked subjects to point at subliminally presented (30 ms) words that denoted low motivation (13 subjects) or high motivation (13 subjects). Afterwards, subjects completed a questionnaire of learning-specific motivation. No effect of priming was found for pointing parameters such as reaction time, but an effect emerged for self-assessed motivation level. The subject group primed with high-motivation words rated their motivation higher than the group primed with low-motivation words. The results indicate that not only the direction, but also the level of motivation can be manipulated subliminally, and supports the view that motivation can influence behavior without actor’s explicit knowledge.

Keywords

Semantic Priming; Subliminal Priming; Motivation; Conceptual Priming

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[2]	Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2010). The unconscious will: How the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science, 329, 47-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1188595 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3]	Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699-1702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5282.1699 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4]	Hart, W., & Albaraccin, D. (2009). The effects of chronic achievement motivation and achievement primes on the activation of achievement and fun goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1129-1141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017146 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5]	Hüttermann, S., Memmert, D., & Bock, O. (2012). Semantic priming of attention focus: Evidence for short-and long-term effects. Psychology, 3, 128-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.32019 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[6]	Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). Mechanisms of subliminal response priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 307-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0032-1 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7]	Levy, D. A., Stark, C. E. L., & Squire, L. R. (2004). Intact conceptual priming in the absence of declarative memory. Psychological Science, 15, 680-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00740.x [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8]	Mayer, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Suspicious spirits, flexible minds: When distrust enhances creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1262-1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024407 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9]	Meyer, D., & Schvaneveldt, R. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0031564 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10]	Michalak, J., Heidenreich, T., Strohle, G., & Nachtigall, C. (2008). Die deutsche Version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 37, 200-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443.37.3.200 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[11]	Radel, R., Sarrazin, P., Legrain, P., & Gobancé, L. (2009). Subliminal priming of motivational orientation in educational settings: Effect on academic performance moderated by mindfulness. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 695-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.011 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[12]	Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern-und leistungssituationen. Diagnostica, 47, 57-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.2.57 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[13]	Rushworth, M. F. S., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2008). Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 389-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn2066 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14]	Smith, E. R., & Branscombe, N. R. (1988). Category accessibility as implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 490-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(88)90048-0 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[15]	Steinberg, F., & Bock, O. (under review). Differential effects of motivation on grasping.
[16]	Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research (2 ed.). London: Sage.