[1]
|
Armogathe, J. R. (2000). The rainbow: A privileged epistemological model. In: S. Gaukroger, J. Schuster, & J. Sutton (Eds.) (2000) Descartes’ natural philosophy (pp. 249-257).
|
[2]
|
Barbin, E., & Pisano, R. (2013). The dialectic relation between physics and mathematics in the xixth century. Dordrecht: Springer.
|
[3]
|
Blay, M. (1983). La conceptualisation newtonienne des phénomènes de la couleur. Paris: Vrin.
|
[4]
|
Blay, M. (1992). La naissance de la mécanique analytique la science du mouvement au tournant des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
|
[5]
|
Blay, M. (2002). La science du mouvement de Galilée à lagrange. Paris: Belin.
|
[6]
|
Boutroux, P. (1921). L’histoire des principes de la dynamique avant Newton. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 28, 657-688.
|
[7]
|
Buchwald, J. Z., & Feingold, M. (2011). Newton and the origin of civilization. Princeton, NJ: The Princeton University Press.
|
[8]
|
Braunstein, J. F. (2008). L’histoire des sciences: Méthodes, styles et controverses. Paris: Vrin.
|
[9]
|
Buchwald, J. Z. (1989). The rise of the wave theory of light: Optical theory and experiment in the early nineteenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
[10]
|
Carnot, L. (1803). Principes fondamentaux de l’équilibre et du mouvement. Paris: Deterville.
|
[11]
|
Cassirer, E. ([1906] 1922). Das erkenntnisproblem in der philosophie und wissenschaft der neuern zeit. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.
|
[12]
|
Costabel, P. ([1967] 1982). Demarches originales de descartes savant. Paris: Vrin.
|
[13]
|
Costabel, P. (1960). Leibniz et la dynamique: Les textes de 1692. Histoire de la pensée. Paris: Hermann.
|
[14]
|
Darrigol, O. (2012). A history of optics: From Greek antiquity to the nineteenth century. Oxford: The Oxford University Press.
|
[15]
|
Dear, P. (1987). Jesuit mathematical science and the reconstitution of experience in the early seventeenth century. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 18, 133-175.
doi:10.1016/0039-3681(87)90016-1
|
[16]
|
Dear, P. (1995). Discipline & experience. The mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226139524.001.0001
|
[17]
|
De Gandt, F. (1995). Force and geometry in Newton’s principia. Princeton, NJ: The University of Princeton Press.
|
[18]
|
Descartes, R. (1897-1913) OEuvres de Descartes. 12 vols. Adams C, Tannery P (eds). Paris; Discours de la méthode et Essais, Specimina philosophiae. vol VI Principia philosophiae, Latin version vol VIII, Principia philosophiae French translation vol IX; Physico-mathematica vol X, Le Monde ou Traité de la lumière, vol XI (Id, 1964-1974 par Rochot B, Costabel P, Beaude J et Gabbery A, Paris).
|
[19]
|
Descartes, R. (1964-1974). Oeuvres. Adam J et Tannery A. Nouvelle présentation par Rochet E, et Costabel P, 11 vols. Paris: Vrin.
|
[20]
|
Descartes, R. (1983). Opere scientifiche. Vol 2. Lojacono E (ed). Discorso sul metodo, la diottrica, le meteore, la geometria. Torino: UTET.
|
[21]
|
Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1961). The mechanization of the world picture. London: The Oxford University Press.
|
[22]
|
Dijksterhuis, E. J., Serrurier, C., & Dibon, P. ([1950] 1977). Descartes et le cartesianisme hollandais. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.
|
[23]
|
Dugas, R. ([1950] 1955). Histoire de la mécanique. Neuchatel: Editions du Griffon.
|
[24]
|
Dugas, R. ([1954] 1987). La pensée mécanique de Descartes. In: G. Rodis Lewis (Ed.), La science chez descartes (pp. 145-162). New York and London: Garland Publishing.
|
[25]
|
Duhem, P. M. (1977). Aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
|
[26]
|
Faraday, M. (1839-1855). Experimental researches in electricity, 3 vols. London: Taylor.
|
[27]
|
Festa, E. (1995). L’erreur de Galilée. Paris: Austral.
|
[28]
|
Feyerabend, P. (1991). Dialogues sur la connaissance. Paris: Seuil.
|
[29]
|
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Againts the method. London: New Left Books.
|
[30]
|
Gaukroger, Schuster, J., & Sutton, J. (2000). (pp. 60-80).
|
[31]
|
Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J., & Sutton, J. (2000). Descartes’ natural philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
|
[32]
|
Gillispie, C. C., & Pisano, R. (2013). Lazare and sadi carnot. A scientific and filial relationship. Dordrecht: Springer.
doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4144-7
|
[33]
|
Gorokhov, V. (2011). Scientific and technological progress by Galileo. In H. Busche (Ed.), Departure for modern Europe. A Handbook of early modern philosophy (1400-1700) (pp. 135-147). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
|
[34]
|
Hall, A. R. (1993). All was light. An introduction to Newton’s optick. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
|
[35]
|
Halley, E. (1693). An instance of the excellence of the modern algebra in the resolution of the problem of the foci of Optik Glasses Universally. Philosophical Transaction, 17, 960-969.
doi:10.1098/rstl.1693.0074
|
[36]
|
Hatfield, G. C. (1979). Force (God) in Descartes’ physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 10, 113-140.
doi:10.1016/0039-3681(79)90013-X
|
[37]
|
Hattab, H. (2009). Descartes on forms and mechanisms. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.
|
[38]
|
Heilbron, J. L. (1979). Electricity in the 17th and 18th centuries: A study of early modern physics. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
|
[39]
|
Jammer, M. (1961). Concepts of mass in classical and modern physics. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
|
[40]
|
Kokowski, M. (2004). Copernicus’s originality: Towards integration of contemporary copernican studies. Warsaw-Cracow: Instytut Historii Nauki. Polish Academy of Science. Wydawnictwa IHN PAN.
|
[41]
|
Kokowski, M. (2012). The different strategies in the historiography of science. Tensions between professional research and postmodern ignorance. In A. Roca-Rosell (Ed.), The circulation of science and technology. Proceedings of the 4th international conference of the European society for the history of science (pp. 27-33). Barcelona: Societat Catalana d‘Història de la Ciència i de la Tècnica (SCHCT). http://taller.iec.cat/4iceshs/documentacio/P4ESHS.pdf
|
[42]
|
Koyré, A. (1934). Nicolas copernic, des révolutions des orbes celeste. Paris: Alcand.
|
[43]
|
Koyré, A. (1957). From the closed world to the infinite universe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
|
[44]
|
Koyré, A. (1961). Du monde de “à-peu-près” à l’univers de là précision. Paris: M Leclerc et Cie-Armand Colin Librairie. (Id, Les philosophes et la machine. Du monde de l’ “à-peu-près” à l’univers de la précision. études d’histoire de la pensée philosophique)
|
[45]
|
Koyré, A. (1971). études d’Histoire de la pensée philosophique. Paris: Gallimard.
|
[46]
|
Koyré, A. (1965). Newtonian studies. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
|
[47]
|
Koyré, A. (1966). études galiléennes. Paris: Hermann.
|
[48]
|
Kragh, H. (1987). An introduction to the historiography of science. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511622434
|
[49]
|
Kuhn, T. S. ([1962] 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The Chicago University Press.
|
[50]
|
Lagrange, J. L. (1788). Mécanique analytique. Paris: Desaint.
|
[51]
|
Lagrange, J. L. (1973). ?uvres de Lagrange. Seconde édition. Courcier, I-XIV vols. (in X). Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
|
[52]
|
Lindsay, R., Margenau, B., & Margenau, H. (1946). Foundations of physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
|
[53]
|
Mach, E. (1883 [1996]). The science of mechanics—A critical and historical account of its development. 4th edition. La Salle: Open Court-Merchant Books.
|
[54]
|
Mach, E. (1986). Principles of the theory of heat, historically and critically elucidated. B. McGuinness (ed.), (vol. 17). Boston, MA: Reidel D Publishing Co.
|
[55]
|
Maitte, B. (1981). La lumière. Paris: Seuil.
|
[56]
|
Maitte, B. (2006). Histoire de l’arc–en–ciel. Paris: Suil.
|
[57]
|
Malet, A. (1990). Gregoire, Descartes, Kepler and the law of refraction. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, 40, 278-304.
|
[58]
|
Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
|
[59]
|
McLaughlin, P. (2000). Force, determination and impact. In Gaukroger S., Schuster, J., & J. Sutton (Eds.) (2000) (pp. 81-112).
|
[60]
|
Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt-Brace & World Inc.
|
[61]
|
Nagel, T. (1997). The last word. Oxford: The Oxford University Press.
|
[62]
|
Newton, I. ([1713] 1729). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. London: Motte.
|
[63]
|
Newton, I. ([1686-7] 1803). The mathematical principles of natural philosophy. London: Symonds.
|
[64]
|
Newton, I. (1666). De gravitatione et aequipondio fluidorum. Ms Add. 4003. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Library.
http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00093
|
[65]
|
Newton, I. (1803) The mathematical principles of natural philosophy. London: Symonds.
|
[66]
|
Newton, I. ([1704] 1730). Opticks: Or, a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections and colours of light. 4th edition. London: William Innys.
|
[67]
|
Osler, M. J. (2000). Rethinking the scientific revolution. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.
|
[68]
|
Panza, M. (2003). The origins of analytic mechanics in the 18th century. In H. N. Jahnke (Ed.), A history of analysis. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and The London Mathematical Society (pp. 137-153). London.
|
[69]
|
Panza, M. (2004). Newton. Paris: Belles Lettres.
|
[70]
|
Panza, M. (2005). Revision of Italian translation of Descartes’ correspondence on mathematical matters with addition of some critical notes: René Descartes, Tutte le lettere, 1619-1950. In G. Belgioioso (Ed.), Critical notes (pp. 103-105, 254, 482-491, 556-557, 663-669). Milano: Bompiani.
|
[71]
|
Panza, M. (2007). Euler’s introductio in analysin infinitorum and the program of algebraic analysis: Quantities, functions and numerical partitions. In R. Backer (Ed.), Euler reconsidered. Tercentenary essays (pp. 119-166). Heber City, UT: The Kendrick Press.
|
[72]
|
Panza, M., & Malet, A. (2006). The origins of Algebra: From Al-Khwarizmi to Descartes. Special issue of Historia Mathematica 33/1.
|
[73]
|
Pisano, R. (2013). Historical reflections on physics mathematics relationship in Electromagnetic theory. In E. Barbin, & R. Pisano (Eds.), The dialectic relation between physics and mathematics in the 19th century (pp. 31-58). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
[74]
|
Pisano, R. (2009a). On method in Galileo Galilei’ mechanics. In H. Hunger (Ed.), Proceedings of ESHS 3rd conférence (pp. 147-186). Vienna: Austrian Academy of Science.
|
[75]
|
Pisano, R. (2009b). Continuity and discontinuity. On method in Leonardo da Vinci’ mechanics. Organon, 41, 165-182.
|
[76]
|
Pisano, R. (2010). On principles in Sadi Carnot’s thermodynamics (1824). Epistemological reflections. Almagest, 2, 128-179.
|
[77]
|
Pisano, R. (2011). Physics-mathematics relationship. Historical and epistemological notes. In E. Barbin, M. Kronfellner, & C. Tzanakis, (Eds.), European Summer University History And Epistemology In Mathematics (pp. 457-472). Vienna: Verlag Holzhausen GmbH-Holzhausen Publishing Ltd.
|
[78]
|
Pisano, R., & Bussotti, P. (2012). Galileo and Kepler. On theoremata circa centrum gravitates solidorum and mysterium cosmographicum. History Research, 2, 110-145.
|
[79]
|
Pisano, R., & Gaudiello, I. (2009a). Continuity and discontinuity. An epistemological inquiry based on the use of categories in history of science. Organon, 41, 245-265.
|
[80]
|
Pisano, R., & Gaudiello, I. (2009b). On categories and scientific approach in historical discourse. In H. Hunger (Ed.), Proceedings of ESHS 3rd Conference (pp. 187-197). Vienna: Austrian Academy of Science.
|
[81]
|
Poincaré, H. ([1923]1970). La valeur de la science. Paris: Flammarion.
|
[82]
|
Poincaré, H. ([1935]1968). La science et l'hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.
|
[83]
|
Rashed, R. (1992). Optique et mathématiques. Recherches sur l’histoire de la pensée scientifique en arabe. Aldershot: Variorum.
|
[84]
|
Ronchi, V. (1956). Histoire de la lumière. Paris: Colin.
|
[85]
|
Rosmorduc, J., Rosmorduc, V., & Dutour, F. (2004). Les révolutions de l’optique et l’?uvre de Fresnel. Location: Adapt-Vuiber.
|
[86]
|
Rossi, P. (1999). Aux origines de la science moderne. Paris: Seuil-Points/Sciences.
|
[87]
|
Ruffner, J. A. (2012). Newton’s de gravitatione: A review and reassessment. Archive for History of exact Sciences, 66, 241-264.
doi:10.1007/s00407-012-0093-x
|
[88]
|
Sabra, A. I. (1967). Theories of light from Descartes to Newton. London: Oldbourne,
|
[89]
|
Schuhl, P. M. (1947). Machinisme et philosophie. Paris: Vrin.
|
[90]
|
Schuster, J. A. (2000). Descartes opticien: The construction of the law of refraction and the manufacture of its physical rationales, 1618-1629. In Gaukroger, J. Schuster, & J. Sutton (2000) (pp. 258-312).
|
[91]
|
Schuster, J. A. (2013). Descartes-Agonistes. Physico-mathematics, Method and Corpuscular-Mechanism 1618-1633. Dordrecht: Springer.
|
[92]
|
Scott, J. F. [1952] 1987). The scientific work of René Descartes. New York: Garland Publishing.
|
[93]
|
Shapiro, A. E. (1974). Light, pressure, and rectilinear propagation: Descartes’ celestial optics and Newton’s hydrostatics. Studies in History and Philosophy of science, 5, 239-296.
doi:10.1016/0039-3681(74)90002-8
|
[94]
|
Slowik, E. (2009). Descartes’ physics. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: The Stanford University Press.
|
[95]
|
Taton, R. (1965). Alexandre Koyré, historien de la ? révolution astronomique. Revue d'histoire des sciences et de leurs applications, 18, 147-154. doi:10.3406/rhs.1965.2411
|
[96]
|
Taton, R. (1966). Histoire générale des sciences. 5 vols. Paris: PUF, Quadrige.
|
[97]
|
Tiemersma, D. (1988). Methodological and theoretical aspects of Descartes’ treatise on the rainbow. Studies in History and Philosophy of science, 19, 347-364. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(88)90004-0
|
[98]
|
Truesdell, C. (1968). Essay in the history of mechanics. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86647-0
|
[99]
|
Westfall, R. S. (1971). The construction of modern science. Mechanism and mechanic. New York: Wiley & Sons Inc.
|